AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Processor Review

CPU by stefan @ 2017-04-11

For the mainstream Ryzen 5 series, AMD has prepared for its customers not one but two hexa-core SKUs: the Ryzen 5 1600X but also the Ryzen 5 1600. Ryzen 5 1600X does have the same operating frequencies as the flagship Ryzen 7 1800X model, which means a 3.6GHz stock speed, 3.7GHz all-core boost, 4GHz 2-core boost and also 4.1GHz max boost with XFR. The Ryzen 5 1600X does also have the same 16MB of L3 cache, 512K L2 cache per core, 95W TDP and comes in a 3 + 3 CCX configuration.

Introduction

 

 

At first, we would like to thank AMD for sending out their AMD Ryzen™ 5 1600X hexa-core processor for testing and reviewing.

 

 

 

About AMD:

 

“Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) is an American multinational semiconductor company based in Sunnyvale, California, United States, that develops computer processors and related technologies for business and consumer markets. While initially it manufactured its own processors, the company became fabless after GlobalFoundries was spun off in 2009. AMD's main products include microprocessors, motherboard chipsets, embedded processors and graphics processors for servers, workstations and personal computers, and embedded systems applications.

 

AMD is the second-largest supplier and only significant rival to Intel in the market for x86-based microprocessors. Since acquiring ATI in 2006, AMD and its competitor Nvidia have dominated the discrete Graphics Processor Unit (GPU) market.”

 

Product Description, Details Part I

After testing and studying the AMD Ryzen™ 7 high-end family of processors, it is time to also take a look at the mainstream Ryzen 5 series, which is offered at very competitive prices and consists of no less than four SKUs:

 

-Ryzen 5 1400 which does pack four cores and eight threads, with a base speed of 3.2GHz and a boost of 3.4GHz;

-Ryzen 5 1500X that does also come with four physical cores and eight threads, a base speed of 3.5GHz and a boost of 3.7GHz;

-Ryzen 5 1600 which does have no less than six cores, a total of 12 threads; this SKU does come with a base speed of 3.2GHz and a boost of 3.6GHz;

-Ryzen 5 1600X does also pack six cores and 12 threads, but has the highest speeds of the pack: 3.6GHz stock and 4GHz boost.

 

In this article we will concentrate our attention upon the Ryzen 5 1600X processor, which does have the same operating speeds as the flagship Ryzen 7 1800X model, which means a 3.6GHz stock speed, 3.7GHz all-core boost, 4GHz 2-core boost and also 4.1GHz max boost with XFR. The Ryzen 5 1600X does also have the same 16MB of L3 cache, 512K L2 cache per core, 95W TDP and comes in a 3 + 3 CCX configuration. What does the 3 + 3 CCX configuration you may ask? Well, the Ryzen CPUs are built with CPU Complex (CCX) Zen architecture modules that are natively quad-core and while the Ryzen 7 series had two CCXes available with all CPUs fully-functional, this time with the Ryzen 5 1600X we’ve got also two CCXes but each comes with a disabled core.

 

Ryzen 5 1600X is integrating the Zen architecture, which focuses on four different key areas: performance, throughput, efficiency but also scalability.

 

Regarding performance, the new Zen microarchitecture represents a very big leap in core execution capability versus the previous designs from the same company: Zen come with a 1.75X larger instruction scheduler window and 1.5X greater issue width and resources. This practically allows Zen to schedule and send more work into the EUs. Thanks to a new micro-op cache, Zen is allowed to bypass L2 and L3 caches when using frequently accessed micro-operations. The neural network-based branch prediction unit from the Zen microarchitecture does allow for more intelligent preparation of optimal instructions and pathways for future work.

 

 

Changes have been also made regarding the cache hierarchy with dedicated 64KB L1 instruction and data caches, we do have 512KB dedicated L2 cache per core and 8MB of L3 cache shared across four cores. The cache is enhanced with a learning prefetcher that speculatively harvests application data into the caches so they are practically available for immediate execution. These changes are assuring up to 5X greater cache bandwidth into a core. This type of design enhances the Zen architecture's throughput.

 

 

 

When talking about efficiency, the new Ryzen processors are built on the more power-efficient 14nm FinFET process; in more detail, the Zen architecture is using the density-optimized version of the Global Foundries 14nm FinFET process and this fact permits for smaller die sizes and lower operating voltages. The new Zen microarchitecture does incorporate some of the latest low-power design technologies:

 

-micro-op cache for reducing power-intensive faraway fetches

-aggressive clock gating to zero out dynamic power consumption in minimally utilized regions of the core

-a stack engine for low-power address generation into the dispatcher.

 

 

Moving on to the scalability aspect, Zen architecture does start with the CCX (CPU Complex) which is a native 4C8T module; each CCX does come with 64K L1 I-cache, 64K L1 D-cache, 512KB of dedicated L2 cache per core and 8MB of L3 cache shared across all cores. Each core that is contained in the CCX may optionally come with SMD for additional threads.

 

Product Details Part II

The most vital characteristics of the Ryzen™ 7 1600X SKU are the following:

 

 

Another aspect to remind in the product description is AMD’s SenseMI technology: a package of five related “senses” that are relying on learning algorithms and/or the command-and-control functionality of the Infinity Fabric, in order to empower AMD Ryzen processors with machine intelligence.

Pure Power

 

Thanks to the integrated network of smart sensors that are driving Precision Boost, processor power consumption can be carefully adjusted with any given workload. The telemetry data from the Power Power optimization loop does allow each Ryzen processor to inspect the characteristics of its own silicon, in order to extract individualized power management.

 

 

 

Product Details Part III

Precision Boost

 

By using current/temperature/load information fed by the Infinity Fabric, Precision Boost is modulating an AMD Ryzen processor in 25Mhz increments; this type of granular clock speed control is offering the Ryzen processor a greater operational freedom in order to reach ideal frequency targets and at the same time allows for finer dithering at that ideal target.

 

 

 

Extended Frequency Range or XFR

 

XFR is kicking in when high-performance cooling systems are installed on the AMD Ryzen processors and lifts the maximum Precision Boost frequency beyond the ordinary limits. This is achieved by reading and forecasting AMD Ryzen processor’s distance to TJMax, then converting the available headroom into extra frequency. For non-X SKUs (such as the Ryzen 7 1700), XFR will add 50MHz extra to the operating frequencies, while X SKUs (such as the Ryzen 7 1800X, Ryzen 7 1700X) will add 100MHz extra to the stock operating frequency when the said conditions are met.

 

 

 

Neural Net Prediction

 

Every AMD Ryzen processor holds a true artificial intelligence inside which harnesses a neural network for learning in real-time the applications’ behavior and speculate on its next moves. Thanks to this feature, the AI readies vital CPU instructions in advance for tackling a new workload.

 

 

 

Smart Prefetch

 

Thanks to the integrated sophisticated learning algorithms, internal patterns and behaviors of applications are understood, so they can anticipate what data is needed for fast execution in the future. Data is fed into local cache, so it is ready for immediate use.

 

 

 

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X and Streaming

AMD Ryzen and Streaming

 

Along with eSports, the streaming popularity has increased exponentially; at the heart of this activity lies the well-known Twitch platform that allows people at home to watch live gaming sessions but also interact in the chat room. Radeon ReLive is one of the tools that make possible broadcast of live game footage, audio, webcams, overlays and other multimedia contents to legions of fans.

Since some of the games are quite CPU-intensive to run and combining this with the fact that streaming adds quite a bit of load to the processor, we will get lots of input lag or other performance-related issues. Twitch is proposing a solution to this issue, which implies using two different PCs in order to split the workload: one system plays the game, while the second system with a capture card receives output from the GPU and serves as a dedicated broadcasting system to alleviate performance bottlenecks.

The GPU live video encoding does not seem to please the streamers since GPU encoders do need more bitrate to achieve the same quality as the CPU-based x264 encoder pre-configured on streaming packages such as OBS and XSplit so when talking about the tight 3500Kbps bitrate limits of Twitch, the GPUs are at a disadvantage.

 

 

In the current state, the Core i5 7600K CPU from Intel cannot stream properly to Twitch via OBS given the lack of necessary threads for performing this task. Simultaneous tasks of gaming and video encoding always need more physical threads/cores, an aspect which the six-core 12-thread Ryzen 5 1600X SKU can handle just right. The $249 USD CPU, paired with enough RAM and a powerful video card is able to broadcast 1080p/60 FPS/3500Kbps streams for lots of viewers, with little to no compromise to the in-game performance.

The AMD AM4 Platform

The AMD AM4 Platform

 

The new AMD Ryzen processors would not operate by themselves, unless paired with the AM4 platform. This new platform consists of six chipsets that can be interchangeably paired with the new 1331 socket; this aspect allows motherboard manufacturers to craft different models in order to cover all market segments: entry level (A320 or A/B300), middle class (B350) and premium (X370 or X300).

 

These new solutions do incorporate the latest technologies such as NVMe PCIe 3.0 x4, SATA, SATA Express, dual channel DDR4, native USB 3.1 Gen 2 and more.

 

 

The Socket 1331 streamlines AMD’s socket infrastructure (AM3 and FM2+) into a single part which can host the AMD Ryzen processor, the 7th Generation APU or the future “Raven Ridge” APU based on the Zen architecture. AMD is intending on using this new socket through 2020 even with the introduction of new technologies such as DDR5 or PCI Express Generation 4.

 

The storage and I/O options that have been just described are extra to the SoC design of Ryzen CPU, which does also feature natively:

 

-4xUSB 3.1 Gen 1

-16 lanes of PCI Express Gen 3 for graphics (2x8 mGPU supported on X370)

-4x PCI-Express Gen 3 suitable for a high-speed NVMe SSD or other companion card

-4x PCI-Express Gen 3 for chipset communication (free for re-use along with X300 chipset)

 

 

 

As the flagship SKUs, the Ryzen 5 family of processors comes with unlocked multipliers, in order to squeeze even more performance from the system via the UEFI interface of the motherboard, Ryzen Master utility or the overclocking software coming from each motherboard manufacturer.

 

Right from the introduction in December 2016, AMD had promised that all mid-range and high-end motherboards based on the mid-range B350 and high-end X370 chipsets will expose the full-range of multiplier voltage control built into the AMD Ryzen processors. Entry-level motherboards, which have weaker VRM designs, are built to run at stock speeds, so A320 chipsets are locking the voltage and multiplier adjustments.

 

With the presentation of the AM4 platform, we also need to clarify the cooler compatibility; AM4 comes with a wider bolt-through mounting pattern in order to accommodate the extra pins of the Socket 1331 versus the older FM2+ and AM3 designs. AMD has discussed with no less than 15 of the top cooling manufacturers such as EKWB, Phanteks, Noctua, Corsair, Cooler Master and so on in order to provide mounting kits which will enable usage of the previously-launched solutions on the new AM4 platform. What is interesting is that the current AM3/FM2+ coolers that use the clip system for attachment to the socket retention brackets are fully compatible with the AM4 platform, with no modification!

 

The Ryzen 5 family of processors is officially supporting the following DRAM configurations:

 

 

Packaging, A Closer Look Part I

The Ryzen 5 series sample package was by far the most complete one we have received and let’s detail why! All the necessary hardware has arrived in a black, large cardboard box, with a gray AMD RYZEN logo on top:

 

 

 

After lifting the box cover, we have spotted not one, but two processors that have shipped in retail packaging: Ryzen 5 1600X along with the Ryzen 5 1500X (featured in a later review article):

 

 

 

By removing these, even more hardware was available underneath!

 

 

 

 

With this sampling bundle, AMD has also shipped their Wraith Max cooler that is the most capable air-cooler from the same company. It is rated to handle thermal load up to 140W, so it should handle hotter chips even when overclocking:

 

 

 

 

On the top area of the cooler, we will get to see the 92mm 7-blade fan, which is surrounded by a branded plastic shroud. This shroud does also feature a RGB LED ring, which is fully-configurable via software:

 

 

 

By looking on the side of the product, we can spot its construction design; the copper plate is available on the bottom, while the four large heatpipes are transferring the heat to the top area:

 

 

 

 

 

A Closer Look Part II

As we have seen with some other AMD cooling solutions before, the clip retention mechanism is also present here:

 

 

 

Thermal compound is pre-applied on the bottom copper plate in order to aid with the installation procedure:

 

 

 

The 92mm fan is powered from a 4-pin PWM cable:

 

 

 

The cooler does also feature not one but two headers, which do allow control of the LED lighting system. The manufacturer also supplies the necessary cables for these inputs:

 

 

 

 

AMD is recommending a different RAM set for this setup, a GEIL PC4 25600 3200MHz CL16 8GBx2 Samsung B-die based kit:

 

 

 

 

The modules are shipped inside individual transparent plastic molds and the necessary installation cables are also supplied:

 

 

 

 

 

A Closer Look Part III

Unlike the modules from Corsair, these are quite tall, an aspect which may cause some issues if we do opt in for a larger heatsink; these do feature cool looking black aluminum sinks, while the top red plastic component acts as a switch, for cycling between the different LED lighting modes manually:

 

 

 

The top area of the modules was designed to let the LED light shine through:

 

 

 

The EVO X product logo does also have LED lighting applied to it:

 

 

 

On one lateral side of the module, we can spot a two-pin connector, which is used to supply power to the LED lighting system, when we do choose not to use the RGB header from the motherboard:

 

 

 

The opposite lateral side does sport a different type of connector (4-pin), which allows connecting to the motherboards’ RGB header via the supplied cable:

 

 

 

If we do turn the module on the other side, we will get to see a similar heatsink design, only that the manufacturer has also placed here a sticker with the module technical specifications, complete code name but also the serial number:

 

 

 

The next important part of the test bundle is the motherboard; this time AMD has supplied us with an ASRock Fatal1ty AB350 Gaming K4 AM4 motherboard, which does feature the B350 chipset:

 

 

 

Inside we did find the necessary product documentation, along with its hardware bundle:

 

 

 

The motherboard does feature a clean PCB design, with the main PCI-E slot steel-reinforced, dual M.2 connectors for additional storage, a Realtek ALC892 Audio Codec with Creative Sound Blaster Cinema 3 compatibility, a RGB LED header but also an AMD fan LED header, USB Type C for connecting most recent devices, a Fatal1ty Mouse port with configurable mouse polling rate and more!

 

 

 

 

A Closer Look Part IV

Several cooling solutions (both air and water) do use the clip-style mounting mechanism, so it is not needed to remove the plastic components:

 

 

 

On the back side of the motherboard, we will be also able to spot the pre-installed aluminum backplate:

 

 

 

The main product in this review is, of course the Ryzen 5 1600X, which did ship this time in a box, as usual retail SKUs do:

 

 

 

One of the box sides is supplied with a small window, which does reveal the processor design:

 

 

 

The inside contents are described on the opposite side:

 

 

 

The box did also arrive fully-sealed and marked as a “sample”:

 

 

 

After opening up the box, we saw that it was provided with a separate compartment, which could have housed a stock cooler:

 

 

 

The documentation leaflet supplied by AMD does contain the “certificate of authenticity”, information about the warranty, but also simple installation instructions; the CPU along with the case sticker are supplied in a separate, smaller cardboard enclosure:

 

 

 

The Ryzen 5 1600X processor is also held for safety inside a transparent plastic mold:

 

 

 

This new processor series is supplied with nice-looking case stickers, which do sport a similar design to the ones we have seen with the Ryzen 7 SKUs:

 

 

 

A Closer Look Part V

A closer look at the Ryzen 5 1600X CPU does reveal a central logo that uses specific fonts. The Ryzen CPUs are using solder between the HSF and the cores, for an optimal heat conduction to the cooling system; the later experiments have proven that delidding does not bring any benefit in this case:

 

 

 

 

On the top area of the HSF, we will get to see the exact processor name for easy identification:

 

 

 

The lower area comes with some laser-etched serial numbers; our sample was manufactured in China:

 

 

 

A view from the side of the processor does reveal the HSF height along with the black sealing gasket:

 

 

 

On the back side of the CPU PCB, we will find 1331 golden pins, and its specific pin placement does not allow wrong installations on the motherboard socket:

 

 

 

The installation of the Ryzen 5 1600X processor inside the socket was pretty straightforward:

 

 

 

Since our intention was to push the CPU frequencies as high as 4GHz, we opted-in for using our own DeepCool Captain 240 EX White liquid cooler, which makes use of its own retention mechanism:

 

 

 

We have completed our system installation, so it’s ready for testing!

 

 

 

System Preparation

Prior to testing the new hardware, we made sure to use the latest BIOS for the ASRock Fatal1ty AB350 Gaming K4 AM4 motherboard; AMD has instructed to use the 2.20A version, which was not available on the manufacturer’s website at the time of the review.

 

As before, we have reset the BIOS to defaults and made sure that all options inside the UEFI interface were set to “Auto”, in order to delegate the overclocking task to AMD Ryzen Master (recently updated to 1.01 in order to show correct temperatures for the Ryzen 5 1600X, Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 7 1800X processors). The tool informs us that if improper settings are applied, damages may occur:

 

 

 

Ryzen Master is a very handy software tool from AMD, which allows adjusting the core speeds of the Ryzen processors on-the-fly, along with the core voltage, MEM VDDIO, MEM VTT or VDDCR SOC voltage. The other operations such as memory clock adjustment, core deactivation or memory latencies are requiring a system reboot after setup. You must also note that when overclocking the Ryzen 5 1600X CPU, features such as Precision Boost and XFR (which are part of SenseMI) will be disabled:

 

 

 

In order to provide a similar viewer experience as in the previous articles, we have started the first stage by running a Prime95 stress test instance on all threads, all this at stock speeds in order to monitor the CPU VCore voltages in full-load along with the maximum temperatures. We are happy to inform that the system did barely reach 53.5 degrees Celsius in Full Load, while the Deepcool Captain 240 EX fans were connected to the motherboard header, in “Auto” mode:

 

 

 

The next testing procedure did imply clocking the Ryzen 5 1600X at 4GHz and we also dialed-in a 1.375 voltage for the CPU; the Prime95 stress testing did result in a black screen shortly afterwards, so we did continue by setting a 1.3875 voltage, 1.4V or even 1.412V. We could not obtain stability at all so we got one step down to 3.9GHz; we have started with 1.35V, then 1.337V which was the minimum voltage for stability in Prime95:

 

 

 

Of course, a validation was in order for this last result:

 

 

 

AIDA64 System Details

 CPU

 

 

Motherboard

 

 

RAM

 

 

CPU IMC

 

 

Chipset

 

 

SouthBridge

 

 

Core i5 7600K VS Ryzen 5 1600X Test Results Part I

The first Intel CPU we will compare the Ryzen 5 1600X against is the Core i5 7600K (Kaby Lake), which can be seen as a product from Intel's lineup with one of the best price/performance ratios. In order to compare the platform with newer architectures/systems, we have used a 16GB memory kit @ 2133MHz with default timings, a KFA2 GTX 1060 OC 6GB video card, one Cooler Master 850 PSU, but also an OCZ Vector 150 240GB SSD. The platform was running on a fresh Windows 10 Anniversary installation while all hardware was mounted inside a Cooler Master ATCS 840 Tower case.

 

Of course, we have left the results versus the Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 7 1700 inside the charts too, to serve as reference in both stock and overclocked modes.

 

AIDA64


Memory


CPU Queen


CPU PhotoWorxx


CPU Zlib


CPU AES


CPU Hash


FPU VP8


FPU Julia


FPU Mandel


FPU SinJulia


FP32 Ray-Trace


FP64 Ray-Trace

Core i5 7600K VS Ryzen 5 1600X Test Results Part II

In CineBench R11.5, we can spot a clear performance difference between the octa-core and six-core, while the i5 7600K is left far behind.

 

CineBench R15 performance figures are pretty much the same.

 

In Blender render benchmark, we can see the Ryzen 5 1600X getting pretty close to the Ryzen 7 1700, but when overclocked we could not see a very big performance improvement for the hexa-core SKU.

 

PcMark Vantage does show the Ryzen 5 1600X right under the Ryzen 7 1700 (due to lower clocks of the octa-core SKU).

 

PCMark 7 is another benchmark where the AMD hexa-core wipes the floor with Intel’s mainstream i5 7600K, even when the CPU is overclocked at 4.8GHz.

 

In PCMark 8, we can see the Ryzen 5 1600X trading punches with its octa-core counterparts; in this particular benchmark, the Intel Core i5 7600K overclocked at 4.8GHz is very competitive.

 

 

 

 

CineBench R11.5

CineBench R15

Blender Ryzen Render

PCMark Vantage

PCMark 7

PCMark 8

 

Core i5 7600K VS Ryzen 5 1600X Test Results Part III

SuperPI 32M benchmark does benefit from higher clocks, so the Intel platform is a clear winner here.

 

The extra cores are very beneficial in the HWBOT X265 benchmark, so the Ryzen 7 series takes the lead; however, the hexa-core succeeds to beat the i5 7600K even when it is overclocked at 4.8GHz!

 

3DMark Vantage CPU benchmark scales very well with the number of cores and here we have another win of the Ryzen 5 1600X over the i5 7600K from Intel.

 

3DMark 11 is telling us a similar story, only that in Extreme mode the VGA card limitations start to appear so the difference between the CPUs is much smaller.

 

3DMark 2013 is showing benefits of the increased stock clocks in case of the Ryzen 5 1600X versus the 1700 in Ice Storm, but it is no match for it when overclocked.

 

Unigine Valley benchmark seems to benefit from the increased clocks of the Intel platform, but the difference is not that big; minimum FPS are great in the case of the Ryzen 5 1600X, also given to the updated AMD Generic Encapsulated Software Architecture (AGESA).

 

Ashes of the Singularity is another win of the Ryzen 5 1600X over Intel’s i5 7600 (stock and overclocked).

 

 

 

 

SuperPI XS 32M

X265 Benchmark (HWBOT)

1080P 64-bit Normal

3DMark Vantage

3DMark 11

3DMark 2013

Unigine Valley

Ultra AA Off DX11 1920X1080

Ashes of the Singularity DX12

CPU Focused

 

Intel Broadwell-E VS AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

As a second stage, thanks to our colleague reviewer colleague Albrecht which has lend a hand with his database, we are going to also pit the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X against the six-core 6800K Broadwell-E, the Intel i7 7700K but also the i5 7600K and check out the performance differences. In order to produce comparable results, we have used the same memory timings as he did (DDR4 at 2133C15-15-15-35 2T), while exchanging the KFA2 GTX 1060 OC 6GB video card with a HIS R9 290X 4GB (1080 GPU/ 1250 MEM) video card.

 

The CineBench R10 rendering benchmark does show another win of the mainstream Ryzen 5 1600X hexa-core over the i5 7600K when discussing about multi-threaded performance; the increased memory clocks of the Intel platforms however are a benefit in the single-threaded stage.

 

CineBench R11.5 shows the Ryzen 5 1600X ahead of Intel’s six-core 6800K, but also takes a win against the mainstream Intel platforms.

 

Fritz Chess shows the hexa-core again winning over the Intel’s i7 7700K, i5 7600K, all at stock clocks.

 

SuperPI 32M is beneficial for CPU cores with higher clocks, so Intel takes the lead again.

 

In Handbrake, the Ryzen 5 1600X takes the lead not only over the i5 7600K but also the higher-clocked i7 7700K from Intel.

 

3DMark FireStrike Extreme and Ultra scores are quite similar; this benchmark seems to appreciate high clocks and this is why we see this time better Physx scores versus the Ryzen 7 1700 for the hexa-core.

 

The HWBot Unigine Benchmark scores are impressive, and this is a benefit of the improved AGESA of the latest ASRock BIOSes.

 

Ashes of the Singularity DX11 Extreme benchmark is another clear win for the Intel platform. We do see better scores again thanks to the improved AGESA.

 

 

 

CineBench R10 CPU


CineBench R11.5 CPU


Fritz Chess


SuperPI 32M


Handbrake


FutureMark FireStrike Extreme


FutureMark FireStrike Ultra


HWBOT Unigine Heaven DX11 Extreme


Ashes of Singularity - Extreme Preset DX11

DDR4 Frequency Scaling

By using the memory timings of the previously supplied AMD kit (15-17-17-35), we will check out how the performance of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X does scale when the memory frequency increases. For this aspect, we have included games, CineBench R15 suite for rendering, HWBOT X265 Encoding suite but also SuperPi 32M.

 

 

Bioshock Infinite

 

Tomb Raider

 

Hitman: Absolution

 

Ashes of the Singularity DX12 FHD

CPU Focused

 

CineBench R15 Multicore

 

X265 Benchmark (HWBOT)

1080P 64-bit Normal

 

SuperPI 32M

Memory Bandwidth Difference

With the help of the AIDA64 utility, we have been able to check out the memory bandwidth differences at the speeds we have tried during the DDR scaling tests.

2133MHz


2400MHz


2667MHz


2933MHz

 

Wraith Max CPU Cooler

We will also take a look at the Wraith Max CPU cooler, as supplied by AMD and check out the temperature outputs at stock settings, but also make sure if it can handle the overclocking speed we have succeeded thanks to the Deepcool Captain 240 EX liquid cooler.

 

This particular model does also sport RGB lighting and is meant to be used along with the Ryzen 5 1600X CPU.

 

Wraith Max is using the stock AMD mounting system with clips, so the installation is pretty straight forward:

 

 

 

 

After we have plugged the 4-pin PWM fan connector, we can either choose to use the RGB cable in order to connect it to the RGB header (use the dedicated ASRock RGB application) or go straight for the USB cable and utilize the dedicated utility from AMD.

 

Let’s power up the system and check out what this cooler is capable of!

 

 

 

The dual LED rings of the CPU cooler looks really awesome in operation; the ASRock RGB applications comes with plenty of effects we can apply to the Wraith Max:

 

 

 

Here is an example of the LED lighting effects:

 

 

 

In order to monitor the CPU temperatures, we did use the HWiNFO64 utility, while for stress testing we have utilized the Prime95 applications (Blend):

 

 

 

Wraith Spire was able to keep the processor at a decent 59.6 degrees Celsius temperature at maximum stress, while the fan speed did increase only a little bit (monitored by the ASRock Fatal1ty AB350 Gaming K4 motherboard). We have also tried the same 3.9GHz overclock at the 1.337V voltage in Ryzen Master, but the system froze after just a minute!

 

 

Conclusive Thoughts

For the mainstream Ryzen 5 series, AMD has prepared for its customers not one but two hexa-core SKUs: the Ryzen 5 1600X but also the Ryzen 5 1600. Ryzen 5 1600X does have the same operating frequencies as the flagship Ryzen 7 1800X model, which means a 3.6GHz stock speed, 3.7GHz all-core boost, 4GHz 2-core boost and also 4.1GHz max boost with XFR. The Ryzen 5 1600X does also have the same 16MB of L3 cache, 512K L2 cache per core, 95W TDP and comes in a 3 + 3 CCX configuration. With its AMD suggested e-tail price of $249, it really leaves the competition in the dust when discussing about productivity applications, while keeping the power consumption as low as possible.

 

Given the fact that we are discussing about a SKU which does feature a similar hardware design as the Ryzen 7 series, we did expect right from the beginning about the same overclocking headroom for the Ryzen 5 1600X as we have seen before. This practically means that most CPUs of this type would do 3.9GHz all-core speeds quite easily, while 4GHz often needs more voltage applied which does also increase the heat output. Our sample was capable of an all-core overclock of 3.9GHz at 1.337V via Ryzen Master and we were unable to hit 4GHz stable even when dialing 1.412V from the application interface. During testing, we have also spotted a higher VDroop with the ASRock motherboard than with the previous X370 boards we have used with the Ryzen 7 and there was also no LLC setting inside the UEFI so we think that the processor has more potential with a LLC-capable board.

 

The new B350 BIOSes do feature an updated AGESA code, which brings improvements regarding memory compatibility: while in our case the system was not capable to boot at 3200MHz, the behavior at 2933MHz was much better versus the X370 meaning that there were no failed reboots or instabilities of any kind. The more interesting fact is that we have also experienced FPS boosts in games so the Ryzen CPUs are more capable than initially thought in 3D applications.

 

Regarding the power consumption of the system, we have recorded 54.7W in IDLE, 73.8W while watching a 4K movie clip, 129W while encoding with Handbrake but also 125W when gaming. With a 3.9GHz all-core overclock, we have got 61.3W in IDLE, 79.4W when watching the exact same movie clip, 143W while encoding with Handbrake and 134W while gaming.

 

For the European market, the MSRP for the Ryzen 5 1600X is 289 Euros, while the Ryzen 5 1600 can be found for about 249 Euros.

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Processor is Recommended for:

 

 

We would like to thank again to AMD for making this review possible!

 

 

  翻译: