CPU Heatsink Roundup May 2006

CPU Cooling by jmke @ 2006-05-01

Eight new heatsinks are compared to 21 other air cooling solutions from different manufactures. We have some promising entries from Spire, Aerocool, Scythe, Thermaltake and Tuniq for you today!

Introduction & Test Setup

Introduction

Welcome to the next edition of our heatsink roundups, today we have these new contestants for you:

Madshrimps (c)
Tuniq Tower 120 showed up late for the group photo-shoot ;)


  • Aerocool Dominator
  • Arctic Cooling Alpine 64
  • Spire DiamondCool II
  • Spire VertiCool II
  • Scythe Katana CU
  • Scythe Mine
  • Thermaltake Mini Typhoon
  • Tuniq Tower 120


  • And heatsinks included for comparison which were already tested in the Sonata II:

  • AMD Stock Cooling *
  • AMD’s new Heat pipe Stock cooling *
  • Arctic Cooling Freezer 64 *
  • Arctic Cooling Freezer 64 Pro *
  • Asus X-Mars *
  • Coolermaster Susurro *
  • Noctua NH-U 12 *
  • Noctua NH-U 9 *
  • Sharkoon Red Shock *
  • Silverstone NT02 *
  • Scythe NCU-2000 *
  • Scythe Ninja *
  • Scythe Samurai Z *
  • Scythe Shogun *
  • Thermalright XP-90C *
  • Thermalright XP-90 *
  • Thermalright XP-120 *
  • Thermalright HR-01 *
  • Thermalright SI-120 *
  • Thermaltake Big Typhoon *
  • Zalman CNPS9500CU *


  • If you want to know more about the heatsinks starred (*) in the lists above please visit my heatsink review overview

    Test Setups and Methodology

    JMke's Test Setup
    CPU A64 3200+
    Mainboard DFI NF3 Lanparty
    Memory 1 * 256Mb PC3700 OCZ
    Other
  • ATI R9000 Passive Cooling
  • Silverstone EFN-300 300W Passive Cooled PSU
  • Maxtor 120GB IDE HDD


  • in-take temperature was measured at 22°C for all tests, but temp fluctuations, different mounting and user error can account up to 1-3°C of inaccuracy in the obtained results. Please keep this in mind when looking at the results. Each heatsink was tested repeatedly; if we got questionable results the test was restarted.
  • Noise level of each HSF combo was recorded with SmartSensor SL4001A, the sensor was placed ~50cm away from the case. The lowest dBA reading in the test room was 32.5dBA with everything turned off!
  • System was stressed by running K7 CPU Burn for 30min (after Thermal Compound’s burn-in); this application pushes the temperature higher then any other application or game we’ve yet encountered. Speedfan was used to log maximum obtained temperatures.
  • Arctic Silver kindly send us their “Lumière” thermal testing compound which has the same colour as Ceramique, but only a break in time of 30min!
  • Arctic Silver’s ArctiClean was used to clean off thermal paste of the CPU and heatsink between tests

    Fans used for comparison

    To eliminate as much variables in the tests I test each heatsink with a “reference” fan if I can mount them. If the HSF comes with its own fan, I will compare the performance of that fan to the reference one I use.

  • Delta NFB0912L 92mm: 42CFM
  • Papst 120mm 4412 F/2GLL: 40CFM


    The Case

    Since I’m only using an Athlon 3200+ for my tests, it would be interesting to overclock the CPU so its maximum heat output increases and it can simulate a higher clocked Athlon 64.

    I recently purchased a power meter similar to this. Doing a few basic measurements with the test system gave these results for full system wattage usage.

  • Athlon S754 3200+ @ 2200Mhz - 1.5v: idle: 67Watt / Load: 125Watt
  • Athlon S754 3200+ @ 2420Mhz - 1.7v: idle: 78Watt / Load: 165Watt

    In my days of Athlon XP HSF testing an increase of 0.1v vcore would result in 4-6°C higher CPU temps, so without much surprise the temperature results in this roundup with the 1.7v Athlon 64 will be much higher.

    Noise was recorded approx. 50cm away from the case at an angle, here’s a (very bad) drawing of how the dBA meter was position opposite the case and the test-room.

    Madshrimps (c)
    Green box = Sonata II – White Dot = dBA meter


    3 different test scenarios were configured as such:

    Madshrimps (c)


  • Test Setup 1: Overclocked and Silent

    - Athlon 64 3200+ @ 2400 – 1.7v vcore
    - Antec Sonata II + Silverstone Passive PSU
    - AcoustiFan DustPROOF 120mm @ 5v in the rear as outtake (mounted with soft-mounts)
    - nVidia TNT2 Passive cooled video card
    - Noise produced with system running without HSF fan: 34dBA @ 50cm


  • Test Setup 2: Stock speeds and Silent

    - Athlon 64 3200+ @ 2200 – 1.5v vcore
    - Antec Sonata II + Silverstone Passive PSU
    - AcoustiFan DustPROOF 120mm @ 5v in the rear as outtake (mounted with soft-mounts)
    - nVidia TNT2 Passive cooled video card
    - Noise produced with system running without HSF fan: 34dBA @ 50cm

  • Test Setup 3: Stock speeds and Silent – Passive CPU cooling

    - Athlon 64 3200+ @ 2200 – 1.5v vcore
    - Antec Sonata II + Silverstone Passive PSU
    - AcoustiFan DustPROOF 120mm @ 12v/7.5v/5v in the rear as outtake (mounted with soft-mounts)
    - nVidia TNT2 Passive cooled video card

    What was measured?

  • The CPU temperature was measured with SpeedFan and highest value recorded
  • Temperature of air coming into to the case at the front
  • PWM temperature through SpeedFan, this represent the area around the CPU socket, the power management caps which you see on a motherboard, they are there to make sure the power which is fed into the motherboard coming from the PSU is filtered and delivered the CPU and other components. Too high temperature will cause Vcore fluctuations which in turn causes system instability.

    Let's get started with our first new contestant ->
  • Aerocool Dominator

    Aerocool Dominator:
    Supplied by: ITC Multimedia

    Aerocool is no newcomer to the cooling industry, they have been offering heatsink/fan solutions since the first Athlon S462 appeared, with the increase in heat output they have altered their designs to keep up performance, with the recent trend towards silent computing the fan size on most heatsinks has grown to provide enough airflow at lower noise levels.

    Aerocool takes the extreme approach and combines a copper/alu heatsink with a massive 140mm fan, much like their latest ATX enclosure which features a 140mm in-take fan and a huge 250mm side panel unit.

    The Dominator is quite new, so it might no be available everywhere at the time of writing, in Europe it’s priced relatively low at ~€40.

    Madshrimps (c)


    Specifications :

    Compatibility:
  • AMD: Athlon64/64+ Socket754/940/939
  • Intel S478 and S775

    Fan included: 140mm x 140mm x 20mm - Sleeve Bearing
    (1200rpm / 2.4W / 68.37CFM)

    Heatsink Dimensions: L155xW140xH100mm
    Weight: 630gr

    In the Box :

    Madshrimps (c)


  • Mounting bracket and screws for the different platforms
  • Instruction manual with clear pictures
  • Tube of thermal paste

    Construction :

    The Dominator shares the design idea of the popular Thermalright XP-120, 3 heat pipes are joined at the base and they transfer heat to the top where a large series of aluminum fins dissipate the heat. The base is has a good finishing and doesn’t require any extra lapping work. Depending on what platform you will install this heatsink you’ll have to install additional mounting pieces to base by using the 2 screws supplied which screw into the small heatsink that sits on top of the base.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    Installation :

    Installation requires motherboard removal as you have to replace the default mounting bracket with the included metal one. The heatsink is screwed tight into place without the use of tools but due to the size of the Dominator it can be hard to sufficiently tighten the nuts. With the Dominator installed and the motherboard placed back into the case it becomes evident that there’s not much room left to maneuver inside, the 140mm fan support really adds to the overall dimensions of the heatsink making it a tight fit. If you look at the photo on the right you can see that there’s hardly any room left between the heatsink and rear exhaust fan.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    Performance and Noise :

    For direct comparison I’ve include the SI-120 and XP-120 from Thermalright and the Thermaltake Big Typhoon, these heatsinks share a similar design philosophy where the fan is blowing down onto the motherboard and the fins are elevated from the base by use of several heatpipes. A silent Papst 120mm fan was used on those heatsinks that support it. The Dominator is restricted to its own 140mm fan as there are no other mounting holes for other sized fans available.

    Madshrimps (c)


    With the CPU at default speeds the difference between the heatsinks is not very big, the only temperature readings which stands out is the PWM with the Dominator’s fan 50%, at that setting the fan is slightly quieter than the Papst @ 100% and the Dominator almost matches performance of the XP-120.

    At full fan speed the 140mm fan is noticeable louder but is not able to take the performance lead as both the SI-120 and Big Typhoon remain ahead.

    Madshrimps (c)


    The increased heat generation puts the PWM area with the Dominator @ 50% close to critical temperatures. At full fan speed the gap with the SI-120/Big Typhoon widens while the Dominator now comes out ahead of the XP-120, all the while generating more noise with the fan at full speed.

    The Verdict:

    Aerocool ventured into the bigger is better area with their Dominator, unfortunately this has not proven to true here today, with only 3 heat pipes not enough heat can be removed efficiently to beat make it stand out amongst the competition. The large 140mm fan offers okay performance at full speed but is quite noisy compared to other silent fans.

    PRO
    Good overall performance
    Okay performance/noise ratio 140mm fan equipped
    Multi Platform Compatible


    CON
    Motherboard removal required
    At lower fan speeds PWM area gets very high


  • Where to buy?


    Next up is the Arctic Cooling Alpine 64 ->
  • Arctic Cooling Alpine 64

    Arctic Cooling Alpine 64:
    Supplied by: Arctic Cooling

    Arctic Cooling is well known for their video card coolers and excellent Freezer series of CPU coolers, their latest addition is the Alpine 64, a CPU cooler priced at ~€6 (I kid you not!). What can you expect from a heatsink which costs almost less than a Maxi Menu in your local McDonalds? It’s definitely not meant to beat their own Freezer series, so let’s see how it does compared to the stock AMD cooling solutions.

    Madshrimps (c)


    Specifications :

    Compatibility:
  • AMD: Athlon64/64+ Socket754/940/939

    Fan included: Custom size (113x100x47mm)
    (2000rpm / 0.17amp / 36CFM)

    Heatsink Dimensions: L78xW198xH56mm
    Weight: 486gr

    In the Box :

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


  • Instruction manual
  • Tube of thermal paste

    The base of the heatsink comes pre-applied with thermal paste, the included tube is for when you decide to reinstall the cooler. I tested the Alpine 64 with it the pre-applied thermal paste and let it settle for 2 days, stressing the CPU 100% and allowing the paste to "cure". However I could not find any difference when compared to the Arctic Silver Lumiere I used, the CPU temperature results were too close to call one compound "the winner".

    Construction :

    The Alpine 64 has been engineered to be a cost effective unit, the whole heatsink is made from aluminum and looking at it “naked” without fan seems like we’ve traveled back in time to the Athlon Thunderbird era. The base of the Alpine 64 is rough, a good lapping sessions will improve performance a bit. What makes the Alpine stand out is the included fan which features its own anti-vibration mounting system (much like the Freezer series) and it simply clips on the heatsink.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    Installation :

    The installation is very simple, but does require a screwdriver; two clips need to be tightened from the top, so the installation does not require motherboard removal. Using the default AMD bracket it fits nicely and sits secure.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    Performance and Noise :

    The Coolermaster Susurro is pretty much aimed at the same market so it’s included in the comparison:

    Madshrimps (c)


    With the fan at full speed the Alpine 64 only falls 2°C short of the performance leader, the AMD stock heatpipe HSF, but even at full speed it’s noticeable quieter than the rest. At 50% fan speed the CPU temperature rises 7°C which is still acceptable and noise levels drop to a whisper quiet 35dBA!

    Madshrimps (c)


    Aluminum can only remove that much heat and at overclocked CPU speeds the Alpine 64 is overwhelmed, as Arctic Cooling told me also, this unit is not meant for overclocking and here you can see why.


    The Verdict:

    The Alpine 64 might not be for everybody out there, but those who want to swap out their stock AMD cooler with the aim to drop overall noise and don’t seek to lower CPU temperatures extremely this heatsink is extremely interesting at its very low price point.

    If you are not into overclocking/overvolting your CPU the Alpine 64 will be good enough for even the highest rated Athlon X2 / FX series of processors; but there won’t be much headroom left in the cooling department.

    PRO
    Solid performance at lower CPU speeds.
    Excellent price, very cheap.
    Silent fan at 50%.
    Easy installation


    CON
    Only compatible with Athlon 64/FX/X2 platforms.
    Not for overclockers


  • Where to buy?

    Next up is the Spire DiamondCool II ->
  • Spire DiamondCool II

    Spire DiamondCool II
    Supplied by: Spire

    Spire’s has made some very successful mainstream heatsinks in the past, with the DiamondCool II they have made an Athlon 64 compatible version of their S775-only version. Fully copper construction and 4 heatpipes combined with an UV active 92mm fan this unit looks promising. Retail price is approximately $30.

    Madshrimps (c)


    Specifications :

    Compatibility:
  • AMD: Athlon64/64+ Socket754/940/939

    Fan included: 90mm x 90mm x 25mm
    (2400rpm / 2.4W / 41CFM)

    Heatsink Dimensions: L89xW80xH53mm
    Weight: ~600gr

    In the Box :

    Madshrimps (c)


  • Instruction manual
  • Tube of thermal paste
  • K8 metal mounting bracket

    Construction :

    The DiamondCool II has 4 heatpipes which are joined in a rather thin base; the base and upper part of the heatpipes are connected by a series of small copper fins. The 90mm fan which sits on top has custom size mounting holes and a unique open design at the top; it’s installed in way which pushes air through the fins. The base has clear marks of machine lapping I could feel the grooves when running my nail over the base.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    Installation :

    Installation requires motherboard removal as you need to remove the default AMD bracket and install the included one. I wanted to test the DiamondCool II with another fan but the mounting holes of the included 90mm fan don’t match with those of a regular sized 92mm fan.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    Performance and Noise :

    With the fan at full speed the DiamondCool II is trailing the stock AMD cooling solutions by quite a bit, although the fan is not very loud at full speed, it’s very quiet either. When reducing fan speed to 50% the noise drops to 35dBA but the resulting temperature increase is very worrying.

    Madshrimps (c)


    I was unable to get the system running stable at overclocked speeds as the temperature quickly above the upper limits. Remounting the heatsink did not improve the results; there was sufficient contact between the CPU and the heatsink. Colleague reviewer Max Page from Frostytech had similar results, the temperature on a 125W test bed rose ~43°C! His analysis of why DiamondCool II performs so badly is spot one:

    The Spire DiamondCool II seems to have the body of a performance heatsink, but the fan of a low noise heatsink. Because the fan is 90mm diameter and relatively slow turning (2400RPM), it doesn't appear as though enough pressure is being generated to move the necessary volume of cool air through the very closely packed copper fins fast enough.



    The Verdict:

    While the DiamondCool II looked like an okay performance/noise heatsink judging by its the specs-sheet, it turned out this was not quite the case in practice. Only lower clocked CPU’s will see a benefit in the performance/noise department as the included fan is quite silent, yet at higher CPU clock speeds (and heat generation) the design of this heatsink is not efficient at all in removing the heat.

    PRO
    Silent fan at 50%.


    CON
    Only compatible with Athlon 64/FX/X2 platforms.
    Not for overclockers
    Motherboard removal required


  • Where to buy?

    Next up is the Spire VertiCool II ->
  • Spire VertiCool II

    Spire VertiCool II
    Supplied by: Spire

    The first VertiCool heatsink was for Athlon Socket A/462 only, I reviewed it back in December 2004. Version II offers higher performance and better compatibility. 2 heat pipes joined in a copper base combined with a series of aluminum fins. Price wise I found the VertiCool at $15 but also at $99(?). The latter seems to an error most likely.


    Madshrimps (c)


    Specifications :

    Compatibility:
  • AMD: Athlon64/64+ Socket754/940/939
  • Intel: Socket 775

    Fan included: 80mm x 80mm x 25mm
    (2300rpm / 1.56W / 25CFM)

    Heatsink Dimensions: L95xW65xH100mm
    Weight: ~350gr

    In the Box :

    Madshrimps (c)


  • Instruction manual
  • Tube of thermal paste
  • S775 metal mounting bracket and mounting gear.
  • K8 metal mounting bracket and mounting gear.

    Construction :

    Two heatpipes are joined in a copper base which has a rather small footprint. The heatpipes dissipate the heat into a series of aluminum fins which are cooled down by a 80mm fan which has an open design. The surface area of the fins is increased by making them stick out more at one end. The base has an excellent finishing with no need to extra lapping.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    Installation :

    Motherboard removal is required as you’re installing a metal mounting bracket to replace the one which comes with your motherboard. The VertiCool II is compatible with both AMD S939/S754 and Intel S775, this is done by use of custom mounting gear which is screwed into the side of the base. However I ran into a problem when mounting the K8 bracket, the 80mm fan blocks the screw, so you can’t get a screwdriver in the right spot. I had to remove the fan, install the heatsink, and then reattach the fan.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    Performance and Noise :

    The copper construction and smaller fan support put into the same category as Asus X-Mars and Thermalright XP-90C and Sharkoon Red Shock, these heatsinks are all quite compact and feature heatpipe technology.

    Madshrimps (c)


    At full fan speed the VertiCool II own fan is on par with the Delta 92mm fan noise wise, it trails the XP-90C by one 3°C, not bad! When reducing the fan speed to 50% the noise drops to a comfortable 35dBA with a ~8°C increase in CPU/PWM temp.

    Madshrimps (c)


    The VertiCool II keeps up nicely with the XP-90C and this at an acceptable noise level; the PWM temperature however is quite high.


    The Verdict:

    Despite its compact size and smaller fan the VertiCool II is able to offer a respectable performance/noise ratio at low/high heat output. It keeps up with some of the most wide respected competitors out there and this at low noise levels. The only major remark is the K8 installation which deserves a slight revision as the fan is blocking the mounting screw at one side.

    PRO
    Good performance/noise ratio
    Silent fan at 50% fan speed.
    Multi platform compatible


    CON
    Motherboard removal required


  • Where to buy?

    Next up is the Scythe Katana CU ->
  • Scythe Katana CU

    Scythe Katana CU
    Supplied by: Scythe

    This compact heatsink from Scythe my colleague Piotke reviewed in September 2005, today I have the supercharged version, CU: fully Copper. Two U-form heat pipes joined at the base with the heatsink supporting a 92mm and the whole tower unit tilting a bit one way.

    It’s about €/$5-10 more expensive than the vanilla version. In Europe: €25, in US: $35.

    Madshrimps (c)


    Specifications :

    Compatibility:
  • AMD: Athlon64/64+ Socket754/940/939
  • Intel: Socket 370/478/775

    Fan included: 92mm x 92mm x 25mm
    (2500rpm / 50CFM)

    Heatsink+Fan Dimensions: L96xW96xH138mm
    Weight: 590gr

    In the Box :

    Madshrimps (c)


  • Instruction manual
  • Tube of thermal paste
  • PCI mounting bracket for fan speed control
  • a whole collection of mounting gear

    Construction :

    The unit is identical to its AlCu brother design wise, the base is very smooth (if you look closely at the photo you can almost make out the icons on my desktop) and the overall finishing is excellent.

    Madshrimps (c) Madshrimps (c) Madshrimps (c) Madshrimps (c)


    Installation :

    Installation of the Katana is quite cumbersome compared to the other heatsinks in this roundup, first of, motherboard removal is required, than you need to prepare the heatsink by screwing an extra mounting plate on the base, depending on how you mount this plate you can change the mounting direction. The heat pipes should not point downwards; the optimal direction is when they are pointing upwards:

    Madshrimps (c)


    Madshrimps (c) Madshrimps (c) Madshrimps (c)


    Depending on the orientation you can use a screwdriver (quick) or the small wrench (slow). I installed the Katana in both directions.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    Performance and Noise :

    In my test setup the power supply does not feature any fans; other power supply might have an extra fan in the bottom to help remove hot air. With the Katana pointing upwards the performance is noticeable worse:

    Madshrimps (c)


    In all the following tests I’ve positioned the Katana towards the rear.

    Madshrimps (c)


    The included fan has a poor performance/noise ratio at full speed when compared to the Delta 92mm fan, but at low speeds it gives better results than the Delta fan. At Full speed it’s hardly quieter than the AMD heatpipe cooling but 5°C cooler. At Low fan speed it’s still cooler than the AMD heatpiped heatsink but noise level is only 35dBA!

    For the overclocking tests I’ve thrown the Artic Cooling Freezer Pro into the mix:

    Madshrimps (c)


    Wow! The smaller Katana CU performs exactly the same as the Freezer Pro when both have their stock fan @ 100% at the same noise level! At low fan speeds the Katana has a negligible lead in CPU temp over the Freezer Pro, but PWM temps are 11°C higher, at 70°C they are on to high side.

    The Verdict:

    The Katana CU thoroughly impressed me, for its compact size it produced stellar performance numbers, even with low CFM fans. Its cumbersome installation can almost be overlooked when you take the multi platform compatibility into account. The included fan offers a decent performance/noise ratio as long as you don’t run it at full speed, with the included fan speed controller you’ll have all the control you need. At full speed it’s only slightly quieter than the stock AMD heatpipe cooler, but at lower speeds it goes into the silent realm.

    PRO
    Excellent performance with medium/higher speed fans
    Silent with stock fan at low speeds.
    Multi platform compatible


    CON
    Motherboard removal required and cumbersome installation.


  • Where to buy?

    Next up is the Scythe Mine ->
  • Scythe Mine

    Scythe Mine
    Supplied by: Scythe

    At Cebit this year Scythe introduced a new high end heatsink, the “Mine”, a custom designed heatsink with a 100mm fan which sits in the middle of the unit. The Mine promises plug and play installation on all supported platforms and a solid noise/performance balance.

    The retail price is situated between $35-50 depending on where you shop in the US, in Europe the Mine is available from ~€30.

    Madshrimps (c)


    Specifications :

    Compatibility:
  • AMD: Athlon64/64+ Socket754/940/939
  • Intel: Socket 478/775

    Fan included: 100mm x 100mm x 25mm
    (1500rpm / 42.69CFM)

    Heatsink+Fan Dimensions: L109xW105xH150mm
    Weight: 560gr

    In the Box :

    Madshrimps (c)


  • Instruction manual
  • Small bag of thermal paste
  • Clip on mounting gear for the different platforms

    Construction :

    The Mine’s main design consists of a large U form with 3 heat pipes running through the whole construction which transfer heat to a series of aluminum fins which have been formed to increase surface area without increasing noise generation. In the middle sits a 100mm fan which is squeezed between two metal strips. These strips can be opened and other sized fans can be placed inside, the Mine works with any 25mm width fan (<25mm doesn’t work as the strips can clamp down on fan’s bracket). base has an excellent finishing and is very smooth.

    Madshrimps (c) Madshrimps (c) Madshrimps (c) Madshrimps (c)


    Installation :

    The Mine features plug and play installation through the use of clip-on mounting gear, these are pushed into the side, unlike the Scythe Samurai Z which used the heatsink’s fins to make the clips fit, the Mine has a dedicated metal construction to prevent accidents like this (from SPCR Review) from happening. I repeatedly installed/removed the clips without issue.

    The next installation step is simply a matter of placing the heatsink onto the CPU and turning the small clips’ handle to secure the installation. The included 100mm fan is also available separately from Scythe, it’s called the “Kaze Jyu, the model here is the SY1025SL12M, it has mounting holes which match with 92mm and 100mm.

    Installation of a 120mm fan did not cause any issues size-wise, I tried to install the 140mm fan from the Aerocool but that one is low-profile (20mm) and I couldn’t secure it in place.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    Performance and Noise :

    First I compared the Mine with the Ninja using the stock fan at 50/100% and also with the Papst 120mm.

    Madshrimps (c)


    At this CPU speed there is practically no difference between the Ninja and Mine when looking at the CPU temperature. The stock fan is remarkably silent at full speed, only 36dBA, and offering performance similar to the larger 120mm Papst, the extra 20mm does play an important role when you look at the PWM temperature which drops 10°C with the Papst.

    In the overclocking test I’ve added the Shogun which is also a high performance part from Scythe.

    Madshrimps (c)


    Again the results from all heatsinks are evenly matched, except when you slow down the fan speed the playing field opens up, the Shogun is not very good at lower airflow and falls behind. The 100mm fan at 50% also throws in the towel, with a 79°C PWM temperature. Equipped with the 120mm papst at 50% both the Ninja and Mine are evenly matched.

    When using a larger fan than the default 100mm you don’t use all the airflow efficiently with the Mine, so I decided to do a small and easy modification: I spread out the fins on the heatsink so they took up more room. Then to guide the air better through the heatsink I added a ghetto fan duct.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    I re-tested the Mine with the 120mm Papst. A quick legend, (Mod) = spread out fins. (Mod+Duct) spread out fins and ghetto duct added.

    Madshrimps (c)


    First thing that stood out was the added noise from the ghetto duct, there is no temperature advantage, so it’s worthless. The other modification showed a ~1°C drop in CPU temperature, but this is well within my margin of error.

    The Verdict:

    The Scythe Mine has a lot going for it, good price, easy installation and killer performance. It doesn’t get much better than this; toughest competition comes from Scythe’s own Ninja which is known to excel with low CFM fans (or no fans at all), the Mine tighter packed fins make it work best with an active airflow and its compatibility with 80/90/100/120/140/* fan sizes offers you plenty of options. Its included fan is one of the quietest stock fans at 12v I’ve yet encountered.

    PRO
    Stellar performance with high/medium/low speed fans
    Stock fan extremely silent
    Plug and play installation
    Multi platform compatible


    CON
    Can only be mounted in one direction


  • Where to buy?

    Next up is the Thermaltake Mini Typhoon ->
  • Thermaltake Mini Typhoon

    Thermaltake Mini Typhoon
    Supplied by: Thermaltake

    As you have correctly guessed, the Mini Typhoon is quite similar to the Big Tyhoon. The Mini Tyhpoon, as the name reveals, is more compact, it’s also completely made out of copper and features a “reverse-flow” 92mm fan.

    At ~$40 it’s about $5 cheaper than the Big version.

    Madshrimps (c)


    Specifications :

    Compatibility:
  • AMD: Athlon64/64+ Socket754/940/939/M2
  • Intel: Socket 775

    Fan included: custom design 92mm x 92mm x 38mm
    (2200rpm / 38CFM)

    Heatsink Dimensions: L112xW94xH125mm
    Weight: 623gr

    In the Box :

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


  • Instruction manual
  • Small bag of thermal paste
  • Mounting clips for the different platform

    Construction:

    The Mini Typhoon is reduced in size to fit the custom design 92mm and be easier to install. The overall design is similar to the Big one, except everything is now made from copper. The base is quite smooth but small traces from machine lapping are visible.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    Installation :

    The clip on system for K8 requires that you place the small metal strip between the two metal stripes which stick out the base, if you misalign this clip you won’t be able to apply enough pressure on the CPU and the temperatures will be higher than expected. If you take this into account when installing the Mini Typhoon you won’t find any problems; plug and play. I was able to easily swap out the stock fan with a 92mm Delta fan, the included screws worked perfectly.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)




    Performance and Noise :

    I compared the Mini Typhoon to its big brother and the Thermalright XP-90C

    Madshrimps (c)


    The stock fan at full speed is horribly loud, the packaging states 18dBA Absolutely Quiet, I can assure you that this fan is not quiet at 12v, what’s even worse though is the performance, it’s not able to match the Delta fan which is 13dBA quieter! Only when running the stock fan at 50% it’s able to pull ahead and offer a slightly better performance/noise ratio.

    Comparing the performance to the XP-90C the Mini Typhoon is on par CPU temperature wise, and is able to cool the PWM area 7°C better. The Big Typhoon clearly has the noise/performance lead.

    Madshrimps (c)


    At overclocked speeds the stock fan of the Mini Typhoon is able to outperform the Delta fan, but the noise level makes it simply no feasible option. With the Delta fan the Mini Typhoon is ahead of the XP-90C and only trailing the Big Typhoon by 3°C, not bad!

    The Verdict:

    The Mini Typhoon with its included fan is hard to recommend, its performance/noise ratio is horrible, however when you swap out the RX fan you can get excellent performance.

    PRO
    Good performance/noise ratio with standard 92mm fan.
    Stock fan offers good performance/noise balance at LOW speed.
    Plug and play installation
    Multi platform compatible


    CON
    Stock fan incredibly loud at full speed with only average performance
    Plug and Play installation on K8 only if you correctly place the clip


  • Where to buy?

    Next up is our last contestant, the Tuniq Tower 120 ->
  • Tuniq Tower 120

    Tuniq Tower 120
    Supplied by: Thermaltake

    Tuniq is a subsidiary product series from the know well known Sunbeamtech; Tuniq offers less “flashy” products, but rather those which belong in the “stylish” department. Their first CPU heatsink is nothing short of breath taking, not because it’s particularly stylish but because of its HUGE size. Weighing in close to 1kg it takes up almost all free space inside your case. 3 large heat pipes are joined in a large base. A 120mm fan sits in the middle of the Tuniq Tower 120 (Not a very original name, but it does bring over the message).

    For such a huge hunk of copper and aluminum pricing still remains acceptable in the ~$50 range. In Europe it can even be found at €40!

    Madshrimps (c)


    Specifications :

    Compatibility:
  • AMD: Athlon64/64+ Socket754/940/939
  • Intel: Socket 478/775

    Fan included: 9-blade 120mm fan. 120mm x 120mm x 25mm
    (2000rpm / 0.25A)

    Heatsink Dimensions: L131xW108xH153mm
    Weight: 798gr (without fan!)

    In the Box :

    Madshrimps (c)


  • Instruction manual
  • Small tube of thermal paste
  • Mounting material and brackets for the different platform

    Construction:

    This heatsink is a monster, I thought I had seen it all when I reviewed the all copper Coolermaster Hyper 6 and that was 2 years ago! This heatsink dwarfs the Hyper6 which in turn dwarfed the Thermalright SP-94, how times have changed.

    The base of the Tower 120 has very visible machine lapping marks, lapping it will increase performance. An uncountable series of tightly packed aluminum fins at both sides of the center fan provide for the necessary dissipation area. There are 3 U formed heat pipes running through the whole construction.

    The included 120mm fan is mounted on a special “pointy” mounting bracket and this slides into the heatsink and is secured in place by four screws. The fan has its own fan speed controller which is mounted on a PCI bracket.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    The largest heatsink I have in the “labs” until today was the Scythe Ninja, how does it compare size wise?

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)



    Installation :

    Taking into account the weight of the Tower 120 I was surprised to find no rear mounting bracket for the motherboard. If your motherboard only comes with a plastic one (like my DFI NF3 does) I would not recommend mounting this heatsink on top, as the strain put on the plastic bracket might just be “too much” and you don’t want to see this heatsink fall down onto the graphics card.

    I used a spare metal mounting bracket and set out to install the unit, on the K8 platform this is quite straightforward, you don’t need any tools to fix it in place as there are very large thumb screws included. The heatsink can only be mounted in one direction, but you can slightly twist the Tower 120 without risking improper CPU contact.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    Performance and Noise :

    The moment of truth!

    Madshrimps (c)


    The Ninja has reigned supreme for some time now in our charts but the Tower 120 is able to sneak in front of it, shaving of 2°C with the Papst at 100%. However at lower fan speed the Ninja still holds the lead (2°C) as the tightly packed fins on the Tower 120 are not designed for low CFM fans.

    With the stock fan at high the performance is awesome but noise levels are very high, fortunately with the stock fan at low speed the performance/noise ratio remains excellent.

    Madshrimps (c)


    Overclocking the CPU shows pretty much the same results, at higher fan speeds the Tower 120 leads the way, at low fan speeds the Ninja is ahead. Let’s see how they do without active CPU cooling, I let the rear fan run at 5v and experimented with installing a ghetto duct mod on the Ninja and Tower 120.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    Madshrimps (c)


    The Ninja has a comfortable lead without the duct installed, once the two cardboard pieces are in place the Ninja really shows it muscles.

    The Verdict:

    With high/medium speed fans the Tuniq Tower 120 is the best air cooled heatsink out there right now, there is no doubt about that. The stock fan offers both extreme performance as a good performance/noise balance when you turn down its speed through the included fan controller. Its huge size and weight does bring complications when it comes down to mounting, the Tower 120 does not include a metal mounting bracket for the K8 platform, something which is vital for such a heavy heatsink. I would not install this heatsink if you only have a plastic one. Tuniq, pack a metal K8 mounting bracket with the Tower 120!

    The Tower 120 is priced attractively, it offers multiple platform compatibility and installation is straightforward. Strongly recommended for those seeking an extreme performance heatsink.


    PRO
    Amazing performance
    Excellent performance/noise ratio
    Stock fan silent at low speeds
    Multi platform compatible


    CON
    Stock fan incredibly loud at full speed (but coupled with extreme performance)
    Installation on K8 advised only if you have a metal motherboard back plate (not included with this heatsink)


  • Where to buy?

    Time to sums things up and show you our performance/noise overview charts ->
  • Performance at 2200Mhz and Passive Cooling

    Performance at 2200Mhz

    Let’s start with the CPU at stock speed and voltage; I’ve grouped the results in two “noise” divisions. Since most rooms have a 30-35dBA ambient noise, anything below 40dBA can be considered as none disturbing and silent to most people.

    While those heatsinks which measured 40dBA can be heard clearly when you are in the room.

    Madshrimps (c)


    Performance at 2200Mhz – Passive CPU Cooling

    Cooling a modern CPU without active cooling can be quite a challenge; there are not a lot of heatsinks out there which can pull it off. Those who can we compare here in this chart:

    Madshrimps (c)

    Performance at 2420Mhz and 1.7v vcore

    Performance at 2420Mhz – 1.7 vcore

    This older generation S754 can take quite a bit of vcore, at 1.7v it’s putting out quite a bit of heat, more than the latest Athlon FX-60, in a closed case with only a single 120mm output fan at 5v (no other fans in the system!) temperatures will rise quickly, any heatsink not capable of keeping the CPU temperature below 75°C will guarantee a system crash.

    Those heatsinks which get into this chart and keep noise level below 40dBA are to be recommended for those seeking to build a silent system. Do remember that CPU cooling is but a piece of the silent computing puzzle, if you have a loud Power Supply, leaf-blower cooler on your graphics card and 4 Western Digital Raptors 10.000rpm drives spinning away, you might find that swapping out your CPU cooling is not giving you the desired drop in overall noise generation.

    Enough talk, here are the numbers:

    Madshrimps (c)

    Features & Compatibility List / Conclusive Thought

    Features and Compatibility List:

    Fan Support Fan Included? Weight (gram) Motherboard removal? AMD Intel
    Aerocool Dominator 140mm Yes 630 Yes S754/S939 S478/S775
    AMD Stock Cooling 70mm Yes 325 No S754/S939 no
    AMD Stock Heatpipe 80mm Yes 400 No S754/S939 no
    Arctic Cooling Alpine 64 Custom 100mm Yes 486 No S754/S939 no
    Arctic Cooling Freezer 64 Custom 92mm Yes 460 No S754/S939 no
    Arctic Cooling Freezer 64 Pro Custom 100mm Yes 528 No S754/S939 no
    Asus X-Mars 70mm Yes 385 No S754/S939 no
    Coolermaster Susurro Custom 92mm Yes 760 No S754/S939/M2 no
    Noctua NH-U 12 2*120mm No 700 Yes S754/S939 S478/S775
    Noctua NH-U 9 80/92mm No 570 Yes S754/S939 S478/S775
    Scythe Katana CU 92mm Yes 590 Yes S754/S939 S478/S775
    Scythe Samurai Z 92mm Yes 360 No S754/S939 S478/S775
    Scythe Mine 92/120/140mm Yes 560 No S754/S939 S478/S775
    Scythe NCU-2000 - - 505 Yes S754/S939 S478
    Scythe Ninja 120mm No 665 No S754/S939 S478/S775
    Scythe Shogun 120mm Yes 790 Yes S754/S939 S478/S775
    Sharkoon Red Shock 80/92/120mm No 820 Yes S754/S939 S478/S775
    Silverstone NT02 80mm Yes 880 Yes S754/S939 S478/S775
    Spire DiamondCool II Custom 90mm Yes 600 Yes S754/S939 no
    Spire VertiCool II 80mm Yes 350 Yes S754/S939 S775
    Thermalright HR-01 - - 525 No S754/S939 S478/S775
    Thermalright SI-120 120mm No 400 No S754/S939 S478/S775
    Thermalright XP-90 80/92mm No 360 No S754/S939 S478/S775
    Thermalright XP-90C 80/92mm No 690 No S754/S939 S478/S775
    Thermalright XP-120 120mm No 370 No S754/S939 S478/S775
    Thermaltake Big Typhoon 120mm Yes 813 Yes S754/S939 S478/S775
    Thermaltake Mini Typhoon 92mm Yes 623 No S754/S939/M2 S775
    Tuniq Tower 120 120mm Yes 900+ No S754/S939 S478/S775
    Zalman CNPS9500LED Custom Size Yes 530 No S754/S939 S478/S775



    Conclusive Thoughts :

    My conclusive thoughts haven’t changed from the last roundup, if you want a silent, yet speedy PC with enough CPU power, you’ll have to invest in third party cooling, especially when you are into overclocking; the stock heatsinks just don’t quite cut it.

    There were an interesting few additions this time around, offering excellent performance/noise ratios, easily installation and multiple platform compatibility. Manufactures are working hard producing products which meet all the demands from enthusiasts out there, making a silent, performing, easy to install heatsink which fits multiple platforms and doesn’t cost too much to produce is not easy at all. The different approaches each have their advantages and disadvantages; but it’s clear that this market is far from dead or stagnating.

    The doorstep for new users is lowered each year, making installation close to risk proof with some of the heatsinks reviewed here today. Do always remember that you’ll violate your CPU’s warranty when you use a third party cooling solution.

    As always I hope this roundup was useful and hope to see you again at the next incarnation. If you know of an interesting air cooled heatsink that wasn’t reviewed yet at Madshrimps please let me know!

    Questions/Comments: forum thread
    Share this roundup with others on Digg.com
      翻译: