Corsair Voyager GT 16Gb and Voyager 4Gb USB Stick Review

Other by jmke @ 2008-07-01

The Voyager GT is the high speed cousin of the well known Corsair Voyager USB stick. In this review we compare its performance to several other USB drives as well as the original Voyager.

Introduction & Specs

Introduction

Corsair doesn’t need an introduction, most if not all our readers know this memory product manufacturer. Today we test two of their portable storage devices, the Flash Voyager and Voyager GT. The vanilla version is 4Gb while the GT version is four times as big, clocking in at 16Gb total storage space.

Madshrimps (c)


Inside each package Corsair included a short USB extension cable and lanyard which matches the color of each USB drive. The Voyager in blue, the GT in red.

Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


Specifications

From their product page we gathered the following details on the Corsair Voyager USB Sticks:

Corsair Voyager GT
  • Capacities: 4GB, 8GB, 16GB, 32Gb - 16Gb
  • Activity LED
  • Water and Drop resistant
  • Comes with TrueCrypt 4.3 install file
  • Limited 10-year warranty


  • Let’s take a closer look at these Corsair sticks ->

    Looks, Usage and Wear

    Looks

    Both Voyager and Voyager GT come in soft durable rubber housing, the removable rubber cap protects the USB connector as well as make the device water-proof.

    The activity LED has marking of the drive’s capacity and it flickers when you use it.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)
    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    The Voyager GT claims almost double the performance of the none-GT USB drive; when we take closer look at the GT we noticed that it is slightly thicker than the Voyager, most likely we’re dealing with a dual-channel USB stick which helps boost performance. With the naked eye it’s hard to spot the size difference though.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    A size comparison next to a set of keys, the Voyager USB drives are slightly longer than the largest key. This might cause issues if you wear your keys in your front pocket a lot.

    Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


    Wear

    The housing of the Voyager USB drives is meant to last, we couldn’t find any visual defects after a week of usage; the soft rubber housing does a good job of keeping shape.

    We did ran into one issue with the Voyager GT, when hooked up the keyring and left inside the front pocket and continuing your daily work, it may happen that you’ll bend the USB connector slightly out of shape, but enough for it to cause issues. We were unable to break the Voyager units in any other way as the housing can sustain quite a bit of abuse; only bending laterally caused issues. We consulted with Corsair who will look into this. If you want a more rugged drive for use on a keyring the Corsair Survivor will be able to get the job done.

    Onto the performance tests ->

    Performance

    Test Setup and Comparison Material

    The Voyager USB sticks were compared to:
    • Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4gb
    • Sandisk Cruzer Mini 512Mb
    • Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 4GB
    • Sandisk U3 Contour 4Gb
    • Sandisk U3 Cruzer Micro 4Gb
    • SuperTalent Pico UT165 8Gb
    • OCZ Rally2 32Gb
    The following test setup was used with Windows XP SP2 installed; we used ATTO HDD Benchmark v2.34 and HDTach 3.0 to measure performance:

    Intel Test Setup
    CPU Intel Core 2 E6400 @ 2.8Ghz (from CSMSA)
    Cooling Coolermaster Hyper TX
    Mainboard Intel 975X Bad Axe (Modded by Piotke)
    Memory 2 * 1Gb PC6400 OCZ
    Other
  • XFX Geforce 8800 GTX
  • Coolermaster Real Power M520 520W PSU
  • 2x Western Digital 74Gb Raptor SATA HDD


  • Performance

    Let’s start with the HDTach’s random access time test:

    Madshrimps (c)


    Both Corsair sticks have very low access times, at below 2ms these flash devices are a world apart from the old generation.

    Madshrimps (c)


    In the read test we see the Voyager 4Gb come out as the fastest USB stick tested to date, followed closely by the Kingston DT HyperX. The Voyager GT is not far behind though and clocks in at 30+Mb/s average read speed!

    ATTO HDD Benchmark allows you to test the performance of a storage media by measuring the time it takes to read or write a file of 256Mb; the difference with other HDD benchmark is that ATTO will read/write that data file in different size chunks, going from 0.5Kb to 8192Kb. In our test we used 4kb to 8912Kbsetting.

    The smaller transfer sizes are applicable for overall Windows operation like Page File actions (~4kb) and small file transfers (.inf , .ini, .dll files). Larger 100Mb+ files are transferred in much larger chunks. Normally you can expect that hard drives do rather well with small chunks, better than SSD in any case, once the file transfer size increases performance will go up for SSD/HDD and USB sticks.

    If you want to run an applications straight of your USB stick, high performance at small transfer size is important. If you plan to use it primarily to transfer large files, file transfer speed at chunks of 512Kb are more important.

    Let’s see how these USB sticks did in the READ test:

    Madshrimps (c)


    Quite a lot of data to sift through, if you look at the 64~8192Kb scores you’ll notice that these pretty much match the results we got from the HDTach read speed test. If we look at the smaller transfer sizes you’ll see the Voyager 4Gb has a very nice lead over the competition, only the SuperTalent PICO drive is able to keep up. The Voyager GT is far from bad but is slower in the read tests.

    Madshrimps (c)


    Here we separate the men from the boys, while most affordable USB drives excel in read speeds, in is with write speed where the more costly products prove their worth. The Voyager GT is on par with the Voyager up to 16Kb, at larger file chunks the performance of the GT starts increasing a lot, writing data at twice the speed of the Voyager 4Gb. The only other USB drive able to keep up with the GT is the Kingston DT HyperX, this is also a dual channel stick.

    Conclusive Thoughts

    Conclusive Thoughts

    The Voyager USB drive series has been around for quite some time now, first introduced in 2005 and it hasn’t changed much in the looks department since then.

    The performance and size have increased however, we tested the entry level of the Voyager which is only 4Gb, if you want more storage space in the same package you can go up to 32Gb. In our tests the Voyager showed excellent read speeds, placing first in the comparative result. Write speeds were average at best though.

    If you want faster write speeds the Voyager GT will surely deliver. This new product in the Voyager product series comes in red and sports dual channel controller for extra speed. Offered in one size only (for now) of 16Gb you can quickly fill it up at 21~22Mb/s which is almost twice as fast as the single-channel competition.

    Depending on your needs and the size of your wallet, each drive has its benefits, looking at the prices you can make out what’s the best choice for you:

  • Voyager 4Gb ~$20
  • Voyager 8Gb ~$35
  • Voyager 16Gb $55-70
  • Voyager 32Gb ~$140
  • Voyager GT 16Gb $85

    The 8Gb Voyager version marks the best price/size in this list of products until the price of the 16Gb comes down of course. The GT is remarkably not as expensive as first assumed, comparing prices with the vanilla Voyager the extra write speed boost is worth it if you often fill/empty that 16Gb storage space.


    Madshrimps (c)


    Corsair Voyager 4Gb
    + Very durable design
    + Very high read speeds (best in class!)
    + Competitively priced
    - Write speed is only average
    - USB cap can get lost if careless

    Corsair Voyager GT 16Gb
    + Very durable design
    + Very high read and write speeds!
    + Acceptable price compared to none-GT model
    - USB cap can get lost if careless
    - Lateral bending can cause issues

    We thank Gareth from Corsair for making this review possible.
  •   翻译: