Using the N2200As always with something new you have to get used to its unique interface, same goes with the N2200. First few hours you'll spend time discovering all the N2200's possibilities and submenus, but after that you'll navigate around quite fluently. The menu is maybe not always that well organised, for example you can find the iTunes server config menu under the 'application server' menu, though the FTP server config menu is found under 'System Network'. I agree that it makes some sense but I have a feeling the AppServer menu was not really needed here and could perfectly be integrated somewhere else.
Another issue might be that some webcams might not be supported, same goes for printers. Aside of that I found the menu lacking in speed, every time you switch from menu a loading window appears and the screen idles for roughly 5s. Discovering the different functions of your product becomes a time consuming job this way, once everything has been set up this is no longer an issue though.
Like mentioned earlier, you should most certainly pay a visit to the download/support section on the Thecus website, you'll find some extra apps and firmware upgrades over there. Installing these software packages also takes some time, plus you must know that they're not installed on dedicated memory meaning that once you change RAID configuration you must also reinstall each app plus you'll also have to redo the firmware upgrade which you might have installed previously. It's good that Thecus is still working on improvements; some of these extra tools might come in handy still I'd love to see some more advanced or in depth changes too for the services that come out-of-the-box (i.e. user authentication).
Performance testsFor testing purposes I've set up a network with a
D-link 665 gigabit router, the Thecus N2200 NAS and a self-build desktop pc with gigabit Ethernet onboard, all connected with UTP cat-5e cable. I've performed 2 tests: one synthetic read/write test using the
ATTO disk benchmarking tool with the Thecus storage mapped as Z drive, and one by setting up an ftp session between desktop pc and the N2200 NAS. To validate my result I've set up the desktop unit with a WinXP install on a WD320gb HDD, afterwards I repeated my tests but with Corsair X128 SSD and Win7 install.
With the upgrade of my home network to gigabit LAN I did expect to see some great performance numbers, unfortunately during my first tests I already noticed that the N2200 isn't the fastest NAS you've seen, with read speed at 15~20Mb per second there is hardly the benefit over 100Mbit lan. The type of RAID configuration did not have a noticeable impact on the results here.
Write speed results are different, we see the same performance stagnating at 64k~128k data size, though in RAID 1 config the write speed is slightly greater than the read speed. Same goes for a JBOD config where we see write speed at roughly 20Mb/s average where read speed would hardly top out 15MB/s.
The reason why we see the performance stagnating at 64~128k data size is because of the way the RAID is configured. During our install we have only the option to choice which type of RAID config you want to have. The RAID stripe size is set to 64k. Averaging our results we can easily see there is no real difference when comparing RAID 0, 1 and JBOD read speed, however when looking at write speed we see RAID 0 come in as slowest begging the question why you would ever want to opt for RAID 0 and not JBOD or RAID 1.
In our FTP session test we first copied a self-made image of the District 9 movie towards the N2200 and so obtained our "write" result, afterwards we copied the image back to our test desktop pc. Roughly following the trend of the ATTO synthetic benchmark results we can now again conclude that RAID 0 is lagging behind RAID 1 and JBOD, this time though the read results are little bit higher.