Samsung's shot at the iPhone 13 — the Samsung Galaxy S22 — is shipping to consumers, with worthwhile updates and features that iPhone users might like to have. Here's how they stack up.
Samsung has announced its new range of phones, the Samsung S22, S22 Plus, and S22 Ultra. Although not even close to identical, they are broadly aimed at the same kinds of users as Apple's iPhone 13, iPhone 13 Pro, and iPhone 13 Pro Max.
They're presumably also aimed at the same market that last year's S21 range was. However, when compared to the S21, the new S22 range has small shortcomings. The screen on the S22 is 0.1 inches smaller than on the S21, for instance, while the battery capacity is also less at 3,700mah instead of last year's 4,000mah.
Yet it's where the S22 compares to Apple's lineup that it gets interesting.
Specifications
Samsung Galaxy S22 | Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | iPhone 13 | iPhone 13 Pro | iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Price | $799 | $999 | $1,199 | $799 | $999 | $1,099 |
Dimensions (inches) | 5.7 x 2.7 x 0.29 | 6.19 x 2.98 x 0.29 | 6.42 x 3.06 x 0.35 | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.3 | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.3 | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.3 |
Weight (ounces) | 5.92 | 6.88 | 8.00 | 6.14 | 7.19 | 8.48 |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | A15 Bionic | A15 Bionic | A15 Bionic |
RAM | 8GB | 8GB | 8GB or 12GB | 4GB | 6GB | 6GB |
Storage | 128GB, 256GB | 128GB, 256GB | 128GB, 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB | 128GB, 256GB, 512GB | 128GB, 256GB, 512GB, 1TB | 128GB, 256GB, 512GB, 1TB |
Display type | 6.1-inch AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate | 6.6-inch AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate | 6.8-inch AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate | 6.1-inch OLED | 6.1-inch OLED 120Hz refresh rate | 6.7-inch OLED 120Hz refresh rate |
Resolution | 2,340 x 1080 | 2,340 x 1080 | 3,088 x 1440 | 2,532 x 1,170 | 2,532 x 1,170 | 2,778 x 1,284 |
Rear Cameras | 50MP wide angle 12MP ultrawide angle 10MP telephoto | 50MP wide angle 12MP ultrawide angle 10MP telephoto | 108MP wide 12MP ultrawide 10MP telephoto x2 | 12MP wide 12MP ultrawide | 12MP wide 12MP ultrawide 12MP telephoto | 12MP wide 12MP ultrawide 12MP telephoto |
Front Cameras | 10MP | 10MP | 40MP | 12MP TrueDepth | 12MP TrueDepth | 12MP TrueDepth |
Biometrics | In-display fingerprint sensor Facial recognition | In-display fingerprint sensor Facial recognition | In-display fingerprint sensor Facial recognition | Face ID | Face ID | Face ID |
Ports | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | Lightning | Lightning | Lightning |
Connectivity | 5G Wi-Fi 6E | 5G Wi-Fi 6E | 5G Wi-Fi 6E | 5G Wi-Fi 6 | 5G Wi-Fi 6 | 5G Wi-Fi 6 |
Battery Size | 3,700 mAh | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh | 3,227 mAh | 3,095 mAh | 4,352 mAh |
Special features | 15W wireless charging 25W wired charging 30x Space Zoom IP68 | 15W wireless charging 45W wired charging 30x Space Zoom IP68 | Built-in stylus 47W charging support 100x Space Zoom UWB IP68 | MagSafe Dual-SIM IP68 | ProMotion display MagSafe Dual-SIM LiDAR scanner IP68 | ProMotion display MagSafe Dual-SIM LiDAR scanner IP68 |
Screens
The Samsung S22, S22 Plus, and S22 Ultra all have AMOLED screens at 120Hz. While, like the iPhone 13 Pro and iPhone 13 Pro Max, the S22 and S22 Plus can go from 10Hz to 120Hz, the S22 Ultra is able to drop down to 1Hz.
This one-hertz refresh rate helps preserve the battery with the always-on display. Apple has yet to adopt an always-on display with the iPhone lineup.
The three phones are all slightly lighter than their iPhone equivalents, most notably with the iPhone 13 being 6g heavier than the S22.
While the S22 range's screens are all the same AMOLED technology and all run at up to 120Hz, only the Samsung Ultra is notable for its resolution. Both the 6.1-inch S22 and 6.8-inch S22 Plus have 2340x1080 resolution, easily beaten by the iPhone 13 and iPhone 13 Pro's 2532x1170.
However, the Samsung S22 Ultra has a 6.8-inch screen that is larger than the iPhone 13 Pro Max's 6.7-inches, but also a higher resolution. The iPhone 13 Pro Max runs at 2778x1284, while the S22 Ultra is 3088x1440.
The Ultra has a max brightness of 1750 nits — beyond the iPhone's 1200 nits — though this only applies while watching HDR content. In typical use day-to-day, both phones are on par with one another.
Processing
Samsung's S22 comes in two flavors. Users located in North America, South America, India, and Africa will get a Snapdragon chip while primarily European users will receive Exynos chips with AMD GPUs. Being located in the US, our S22 Ultra came with the Snapdragon chip.
Samsung includes the same chip — in this case the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 — in all of its S22 models. The Snapdragon is a 4-nanometer chip, with a total of eight cores, starting with one Cortex X2 as the high-performance chip capable of up to 3GHz.
Of the remaining seven, three are the Cortex A710, capable of going up to 2.5GHz, along with four Cortex A510 as more energy-saving cores with a maximum 1.8Ghz clock speed.
Onboard with the Snapdragon chipset is the Adreno 730 GPU, a new generation of Qualcomm's graphics element.
Machine learning is handled by Qualcomm's updated Hexagon DSP, while the Spectra image signal processor offers 18-bit RAW image output at up to 3.2 gigapixels per second.
This all sounds like a leap forward for Qualcomm, but initial benchmarks released on February 11 indicate it's not enough to unseat Apple's A15 Bionic.
Benchmarks showed the Galaxy S22 Ultra as achieving 448 for the machine learning score. By contrast, the iPhone 13 Pro Max 948 for machine learning.
In our own Geekbench benchmarks, the S22 Ultra pulled 1244 for the single-core and a 3610 for the multi-core. Our iPhone 13 Pro Max dominated with 1726 and 4712 single and multi-core respectively.
A Basemark Web score of 552 for the S22 Ultra was also deemed to be low compared to the 1,139 scored by the same iPhone.
Under GFXBench 5, the battle was closer, with the S22 Ultra running at FHD resolution managing 60fps for the Aztec Ruins Onscreen Score against 54 for the iPhone. The Offscreen Score counterpart went more in the iPhone's favor at 36fps to 35fps.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra does see its score go down considerably when switching to WQHD, with Onscreen and Offscreen results of 28fps and 29fps respectively.
With the iPhone leading in most of the tests, the minor win on one particular benchmark just isn't enough for the Galaxy S22 Ultra to level the playing field.
Battery capacity
Actual battery life won't be measurable until the new phones are shipping, but based on specifications alone, the Samsung models appear to have the edge.
Where the iPhone 13 has a battery capacity of 3277mAh, the equivalent Samsung S22 has 3700mAh. Similarly, the iPhone 13 Pro sports 3095mAh, but the Samsung S22 Plus has 4500mAh.
Most notably, the top-end iPhone 13 Pro Max has a battery capacity of 4352mAh. And the Samsung S22 Ultra has 5000mAh.
It's likely, then, that the Samsung phones will have longer battery life than the iPhone 13 range, but it isn't certain. Apple's A-series processors have traditionally performed better than Snapdragon ones, including being better at power conservation.
The cameras make the difference
Samsung and Apple have different approaches to processor design, to the amount of RAM utilized, and even just different operating systems. It's the overall combination of these that sets the two phone ranges apart.
However, there is a clear difference in the cameras that both phones have.
Where the iPhone 13 has a 12MP rear camera, the Samsung S22 has a 50MP one. At the opposite end of the range, the iPhone 13 Pro Max still has a 12MP rear camera, but the Samsung S22 Ultra has a 108MP one.
For the primary wide lens on the S22 Ultra, it has an f/1.8 aperture, which isn't as fast as the f/1.5 on the iPhone 13 Pro and iPhone 13 Pro Max. This also gives the iPhones better performance in low light. Apple also has a wider aperture on the ultra-wide lens, boasting an f/1.8 versus Samsung's f/2.2.
Samsung has improved its optical image stabilization year-over-year, putting it close to Apple's sensor-shift stabilization in terms of performance.
The S22 Ultra also differentiates itself by tacking on an additional telephoto lens, for a total of four lenses. It offers both 3X and 10X optical zoom whereas the iPhone 13 Pro and iPhone 13 Pro Max both only offer 3X optical zoom.
There's a great deal more to phone camera systems than the megapixel count, but Samsung also has a better specification for the front camera. Where Apple has famously lagged behind, only recently moving to a 12MP front camera, the S22 Ultra has a 40MP one.
Samsung and Apple out of step
Apple and Samsung regularly announce their phones at significantly different times of the year. So while the S22 and iPhone 13 range will remain the main models for both companies for some time, Apple will be releasing the iPhone 14 range in September.
Preorders for Samsung's S22 range are going on now at Amazon and from Samsung directly, with units shipping on February 25.
8 Comments
Samsung? Yawn.
LOL anyone thinking battery life will be better due to capacity STILL doesn't know anything about Android's power-hungry deficiencies versus Apple hardware & software. That's pretty bad coming from an Apple-centric site. Real-world testing has always shown that bigger batteries in Android devices really never mean they come close to being anywhere near as efficient as Apple's devices with smaller batteries. I'm surprised there wasn't any gloating about the S22 Ultra having more RAM, because we know that always means better performance for Android devices... 🤣
Wow. I have to assume there was literally nothing newsworthy to post on AI, so you resorted to this useless spec sheet comparison. But at least I know now that "Samsung and Apple have different approaches to processor design, to the amount of RAM utilized, and even just different operating systems." Shut the front door! "Even different operating systems?!" No way!!! I was positive they were both running Blackberry 10. But seriously... I can't believe that in 2022 there is anyone left with at least one working brain cell who thinks that megapixel counts are a good way to compare cameras. So the S22 Ultra has 108MP, huh? Guess that makes it more than 4 times better than a Leica SL-2S and more than twice as good as a Hasselblad X1D2 50C. And what the heck is Nikon thinking in charging $6,500 for a D6 camera body with a full frame sensor that only has 21MP! Don't dumb pro photographers know that's not enough?! Someone should tell them they can shoot much higher quality 108MP photos with a $1,200 Samsung phone!
With the current iPhone (six months old) faster than the just released Samsung flagship, this means that Samsung is at least 18 months behind, as it won’t be for another 12 months before they release their next flagship that ‘might’ leapfrog the current iPhone. And by then, of course, the iPhone will have been refreshed, meaning Samsung is actually perennially behind. So sad.