There is a world beyond "My Thoughts" that I need to understand which is when the "Emotional" aspect of my thoughts would take a back seat and the "Rational" aspect of my idea would be better understandable and visible to me and to those around me If this does not work, then There are benefits for "Me" and "the entire team" if the project is executed successfully and the question is that "How can we (including Me) "Make it Happen" As per the Japanese school of thought, spend quality time discussing the pros and cons of the project from everyone's perspective. "Consensus" will get built during the process.

When navigating conflicting views within a project team, it's essential to identify common objectives and reconcile differing approaches. For instance, a marketing team may disagree on whether to launch a product via social media or TV advertising. To resolve this, facilitate open dialogue and active listening to understand each perspective. Align the team around shared goals, such as boosting brand awareness and driving sales. Explore integrated solutions that leverage the strengths of both approaches, fostering a collaborative environment that yields a unified and effective strategy.

In any team, there will be personality clashes. These are a basic human form of conflict where, for instance, strong personalities jockey for position, or an optimistic personality clashes with a pessimistic one. There are different ways to navigate different approaches, and, hence, conflicts in the task at hand. 1. Avoidance 2. Accommodating 3. Competing 4. Collaborating 5. Compromising Conflict is inevitable in a team environment. As a leader, you need to be familiar with the causes of conflict and what approach to take to deal with the conflict. Once you recognize an emerging conflict, you can choose the best approach for dealing with it. Then you can proceed through the conflict-resolution process and choose the best solution.