Sie sind sich mit Kollegen über die Codequalität und die Anforderungen an die Funktionen uneins. Wie werden Sie eine gemeinsame Basis finden?

To bridge the gap between maintaining code quality and meeting feature demands, start by actively listening to each colleague’s perspective and concerns. This approach helps you understand the underlying reasons behind differing opinions and allows you to address specific issues more effectively. By acknowledging and considering all viewpoints, you can establish clear priorities and negotiate compromises that balance quality with timelines. Additionally, proposing a code review process that involves all stakeholders ensures that standards are consistently met while aligning with the team’s overall goals. This collaborative effort helps achieve a balance between high-quality code and timely feature delivery.

Finding common ground with colleagues over code quality and feature demands involves open communication and compromise. Start by organizing a meeting to discuss everyone's perspectives and concerns. Listen actively to understand their priorities. Propose setting shared goals that balance high code quality with the necessary features. Suggest creating coding standards and guidelines to ensure consistency. Emphasize the long-term benefits of maintaining code quality, like easier maintenance and fewer bugs. Be willing to adapt your approach and find compromises where possible. Encourage collaboration and regular check-ins to align on objectives. By fostering a team-oriented mindset, you can work together more effectively.

To find common ground when there's disagreement over code quality and feature demands, start by aligning on shared goals, such as delivering value to users while maintaining sustainable, maintainable code. Facilitate a discussion where both sides can express their concerns—one about the urgency of feature delivery and the other about long-term code stability. Encourage a solution-oriented mindset by proposing compromises, like implementing a feature but scheduling time for refactoring later. Use objective metrics, like code reviews or testing coverage, to back up your points and agree on quality benchmarks that satisfy both feature needs and code integrity.

First of all you should find an agreement of all team members about a shared understanding of code quality and code styles. Therefore it makes sense to include the fact how long the code should live at the end. Is it a projects that should stay for the next few years or do we only have a proof of concept project where we re-start completely afterwords. Then when the consensus is found – you should think about how to make sure everyone knows it and respects it. Therefore I always recommend to check as much as possible with linter tools (for e.g. eslint, prettier etc.). We had the issue several times that we didn't remember exactly for which case we decided us and everything which is automated – can not being wrong. Mostly :)

If you want to find common ground between quality and features, consider starting by aligning everyone around a shared goal: delivering value to the user. By that, I mean it should not about perfection or speed, but more about user impact. So, when feature demands starts ramping up, propose setting something like "minimum quality thresholds" for code. Tip: Use tools like automated testing and linters to catch glaring issues quickly. That way, you can maintain a baseline quality while delivering features on time, thus creating a system that balances efficiency with responsibility.