Hauptredner sind sich über Präsentationsmaterialien uneins. Wie gehen Sie in diesem Streit effektiv um?

As an attorney, I would approach this much like handling client disputes. I’d listen to each speaker’s perspective. For example, Speaker A might prefer detailed slides with data and case studies, while Speaker B might advocate for a narrative-driven approach focusing on client stories and broader themes. Understanding their reasons is key. Speaker A might feel that data is essential to establish credibility, while Speaker B might believe storytelling is more engaging for the audience. By validating these viewpoints, we gain insight into the conflict's cause. This is all about gathering information and showing respect for each perspective. It sets a foundation for open communication, which is essential for an effective resolution.

I find the best way is to let things evolve naturally. Often the audience engagement dictates the arc of the presentation which sometimes leads things down a different path than originally contemplated anyway.

One thing I have found helpful is to listen! The bottom line is communication;keeping the big picture in view. It takes a specific skill set to value each view with the overall objective in mind.

This will give the presenters a sense of accomplishment that the team work they put in to resolve the conflicts in presentation materials was successful.

I see this as a positive in that it would energize the conference. Why not have both speakers present together as a Point / Counterpoint presentation with a moderator. That way questions could be asked of both speakers, bringing both contrast and nuance to the topic.

Karrass negotiation training was an interesting and thought provoking experience for me. One thing that they suggest, when there is a genuine impasse, is "dropping in a bogey." Sometimes you can't agree, and having another force, in this situation, perhaps the organizer of the event, provide a guideline or even indicate which materials are the more appropriate choice.

Actively and respectfully pay attention to the concerns and points of view of both keynote speakers. Make sure you fully understand the reasons behind their preferences in presentation materials. Encourage open and honest dialogue between speakers so that they can express their opinions and explain their arguments clearly. Promotes an environment of mutual respect and attentive listening to facilitate effective communication. Look for areas of compromise where both sides can compromise and reach a compromise that partially satisfies each speaker's preferences. Explore creative options that can combine elements of the presentation materials proposed by both speakers.

Whenever I receive a formal request to provide speaking services, this request typically outlines the who, what, where, when, etc topics that I am being requested to cover. Sometimes there is additional information or requests for specific information. One point I'll make is when an audience member asks a question, I'll repeat the main question's idea over the mic and focus my answer on the attendees question. Lastly, as a speaker I will ensure the agency requesting my services also has a "clock watcher' since each speaker has limited time for their presentations. There's nothing worse then the first speaker scheduled going way over on their alloted speaking time! Yes, this has happened to me and the other scheduled speakers.😞.