Su equipo está dividido en cuanto a la priorización de funciones. ¿Cómo puede asegurarse de que se satisfagan las necesidades de todos?

You can't meet everyone's needs, stay aligned with the company vision, product vision and the product principles . Those are the guiding principles which control your product

When your team is divided on feature prioritization, it’s crucial to approach the situation with a balanced, inclusive strategy: 1. Understand Needs: Start by deeply understanding the needs and concerns of all stakeholders, aligning them with the product’s vision. 2. Set Criteria: Establish clear, objective criteria for prioritization that everyone agrees on to ensure decisions are fair and aligned with business goals. 3. Facilitate Discussion: Encourage open dialogue where all voices are heard, fostering collaboration and shared ownership. 4. Prioritize Together: Use tools like a prioritization matrix to evaluate features collectively, balancing user impact with feasibility.

For prioritization to be clear both for oneself and for stakeholders, a methodology is fundamentally helpful. When I talk about methodology, I am referring to frameworks ; there are several available for product professionals... or you can even create your own framework. I like to adjust the RICE framework by adapting it to my company's strategy. For example, if my company places a strong focus on ecology, I add a criteria to score the environmental impact of initiatives. This allows the framework to be more aligned with the company’s core values / strategic goals. By customizing the framework, it ensures that prioritization not only reflects potential impact, reach, effort but also considers the unique priorities of the business.

Ignoring the fact that it's far more important to prioritize problems than features, let's assume that prioritizing problems upfront is not an option for this hypothetical team. While it's important to understand the perspectives of stakeholders and field input widely to better understand context, features should not be prioritized collectively, nor should product managers try to seek complete consensus in prioritization. It's the product manager's job to understand the full context of the organization, market, user needs, and more to make an informed decision about feature priority, and to be able to support these decisions with clear reasoning and evidence. Collective prioritization leads to peanut-buttering of priorities, and worse.

constant change can lead to feature creep and loss of focus. Sometimes, sticking to your original vision is crucial. Over-responsiveness to feedback might result in a product that tries to please everyone but excels for no one. Consider setting a "feature freeze" period to refine existing functionalities rather than constantly adding new ones. This allows for deeper optimization and user familiarity. Remember, not all feedback is equal. Be discerning about which input truly aligns with your product's core purpose and target market. Stability can be a feature in itself. Users often value consistency over constant changes. Balance iteration with a strong, unwavering product identity to build lasting brand recognition and user loyalty.