Te has encontrado con comentarios que desafían el diseño de tu código. ¿Cómo se maneja esta evaluación crítica?

🙏Embrace humility and recognize that feedback is an opportunity for growth. 🔍Objectively evaluate the critique, setting aside any defensive reactions. 🎯Focus on the substance of the feedback rather than how it was delivered. 💡Engage in a dialogue to understand the reasoning behind the suggestions. 🔄Incorporate valuable insights into your code, aiming for continuous improvement. 🛠Balance maintaining your code’s integrity with being open to new approaches. 📈Use this experience to refine both your coding practices and your approach to collaboration.

Any challenge to your code or design is an opportunity to learn. Its natural to feel bit defensive but once you go through the process multiple times you will be able to appreciate the immense learnings you had in the process and also overcome the ego and defensiveness. Understand the fact that No One is perfect and neither are you. Give a genuine try to understand the other point of view, evaluate it objectively and discuss both Pros and Cons of both the approaches that you can think. Also, most of the times better solution lies somewhere in the middle of all the possible feedbacks.

Humility is essential when receiving feedback . Remember, the feedback is directed at the code, not at you personally. By maintaining humility and objectivity, one can stay open-minded and able to embrace constructive criticism. Similarly, those giving feedback should approach the conversation with empathy, ensuring the critique is thoughtful and aimed at fostering improvement, not criticism for the sake of it.

"Staying humble and open to feedback is key to improving your code" Even with experience, there’s always room to grow. By putting ego aside and considering different perspectives, you can strengthen your code and learn from others. Not all feedback needs to be accepted, but being open-minded will lead to better results and personal growth 🎯

Receiving feedback on your code, especially when it challenges your approach, can be uncomfortable, but I’ve found that these moments often lead to the most growth. It’s natural to feel defensive at first, but stepping back from ego and acknowledging that no one’s code is perfect helps me embrace the learning process. I focus on seeking clarification and engaging in dialogue with reviewers because feedback isn’t just about fixing mistakes it’s an opportunity to collaborate and broaden my understanding. By considering different perspectives, I often discover that the best solutions lie somewhere in between. Iterating based on feedback not only improves my code but also enhances my problem-solving skills over time.

It depends on who is criticizing the code. You can distinguish between jealousy, technicality, and illiteracy. Jealousy never ends; just let it be; illiteracy is constant, arrogant, and sometimes impulsive. Just ignore it. But technicality is the key. Form a meeting. Write down everything and discuss the issues. This is where the magic happens, whether you learn or they learn, but the connection stays forever. Remember, the technicals are always humble, hungry to learn, and eager to make things ideal. Don't waste your time on illiteracy and jealousy. Best, Houman

The first question to ask when receiving feedback is whether it’s actionable. General statements like "This is all wrong" are not helpful unless they specify what’s incorrect and what the correct approach should be. It’s also crucial to distinguish between criticism of coding style, which is often subjective and open to debate, and feedback related to the correctness or rule violations in your code. Only when feedback is specific and operational can it be truly valuable. This distinction helps prioritize what changes need to be made and which critiques can be acknowledged but set aside as matters of personal or team preference.

After I receive feedback, I really dig into it to understand what’s being said. It’s important to figure out whether the comments are just personal opinions or if they’re highlighting actual issues with my code, like not following the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP). This principle suggests that each class or function should have only one reason to change, making them easier to manage and test. I use the feedback as a roadmap to see where my code might need some tightening up or simplifying, ensuring it’s as clean and efficient as possible.

Once you've accepted the feedback, take time to thoroughly analyze it. Determine if the critiques are subjective opinions or if they point to objective flaws in your code design. For example, if the feedback highlights that your code isn't following the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP), it's indicating that your classes or functions are trying to do too much, which can make them harder to test and maintain. Use the feedback as a guide to pinpoint specific areas that may need refactoring or clarification. This approach ensures that your code adheres to best practices and remains efficient, maintainable, and scalable.

The first point is to check if code is working correctly or not, if it's coding style or coding errors, or performance. Optimization is good also.

The more extensive the feedback, the more important it is to engage in a direct conversation. A brief meeting or discussion with the colleague who provided the critique can clarify points that might be misunderstood if left to written communication alone. Face-to-face (or voice-to-voice) discussions reduce the likelihood of misinterpretation and allow for a more nuanced exchange of ideas. This approach not only helps in addressing the feedback more effectively but also fosters a collaborative environment where knowledge is shared openly.

Whenever I get feedback, I make sure to have a conversation with the person who gave it. I ask questions to really get where they’re coming from and why they made those suggestions. These talks can clear up why they critiqued something and help me see the issues more clearly. This back-and-forth isn’t just about defending my work; it’s also a chance to explain my thinking and maybe find a compromise that keeps my original ideas but also brings in the improvements they suggest.

Don't hesitate to engage in a dialogue with the person who provided the feedback. Ask questions to understand their perspective and the reasoning behind their suggestions. A constructive conversation can clarify the intent behind the critique and provide you with a deeper understanding of potential issues. This exchange can also help you explain your design choices and find a middle ground that respects both your original intentions and the proposed improvements. Effective communication fosters mutual respect and collaboration, ultimately leading to more refined and robust code.

As any remarks, it's better to stay open to the dialog and sharing point of view. All the ideas are good, may be not applicable everywhere but a dialog is a the base of the collaborative work.

Da ich jetzt bereit bin, werde ich mich mit dem Kritiker, den Kritikern zusammen setzen und nachfragen wo der Code aus deren Sicht ungenügend ist.

Once I've gone through the feedback and really understood it, I plan out my response. If I agree with the critiques, I lay out the changes I’m going to make and use tools like Git to branch off from the main codebase. This lets me tweak things without messing up the working code. If I don’t agree with some of the feedback, I prepare a well-thought-out explanation for why I made those design choices. No matter if I’m changing the code or standing by it, I make sure my response is well-informed and always respectful.

After understanding the feedback, plan your response. If you agree with the critiques, outline the changes you'll make to your code. Use version control systems like Git to create branches where you can safely experiment with adjustments without affecting the main codebase. If you disagree with certain points, prepare a reasoned explanation. Whether you're modifying your code or defending your design, ensure your response is informed and respectful. A well-considered response demonstrates professionalism, fosters constructive dialogue, and contributes to continuous improvement in your coding practices and collaboration.

Nachdem ich nun im Detail die Kritik verstanden und besprochen habe ist es Zeit den Code und Dokumentation nochmals dahingehend zu prüfen. Wie immer, bevor ich was ändere erstellte ich eine neue (Sub)Version.

Putting the feedback into action is where things get real. I start by refactoring my code—breaking down complicated methods into simpler, more targeted ones, or reshaping classes to fit object-oriented principles better. It's crucial to test these changes extensively to make sure I'm not introducing new problems. This cycle of coding, testing, and adjusting isn't just about improving the project at hand; it's also a great way to sharpen my skills for any future work.

Implementing changes based on the feedback is where theory meets practice. Refactor your code where necessary, breaking down complex methods into smaller, more focused ones, or redesigning classes to better align with object-oriented principles. Remember to test your changes thoroughly to ensure they don't introduce new bugs. This iterative process of coding and testing will improve not only the current project but also your skill set for future work. By consistently applying feedback and refining your code, you enhance its quality, maintainability, and performance, leading to more robust and reliable software.

Jetzt kann ich beginnen die Anpassungen durchzuführen und diese wie immer gut zu dokumentieren. Dies ist dann meist auch die beste Möglichkeit den bestehenden Code noch besser verständlich zu gestalten.

I follow the SMART for any kind of feedback. S - Give specific and to the point feedback M - Feedback should have a measurable action A - The feedback is achievable through the improvement R - Realistic (with accurate data) feedback with examples T - Timely (most important) review, re-review but give feedback timely not post facto.

Getting feedback is very important to grow as an individual and enhancing your skills. It will help one to understand different approaches to solve one problem. As an individual, i always try to go into constructive discussion and understand the perspective of other person as he/she has invested time to provide the feedback which will help both of us to grow. And first listen each other carefully as peers and do not agree blindly on to the feedback until unless you have not discussed all the aspect of what one has implemented and the other one is trying to suggest. This will help developing good bond with your team and also will help you make good developer.

When you get tough feedback on your code, it's natural to feel defensive, but it's an opportunity to grow. First, stay humble and open-minded. Then, really dig into the feedback to understand where it's coming from. Finally, have a conversation with the person who gave the feedback to clarify and learn more. Afterward, take a step back to reflect on what you've learned. Write down the key points so you can refer to them in the future. The goal is to keep improving and use every piece of feedback as a stepping stone. It's all about turning criticism into a learning experience that makes you a better programmer.

After I've made the changes, I take some time to reflect on what the feedback process taught me. I think about how it's shaped my understanding of code design and how I can use these insights in my future projects. Sometimes, I even document the critiques and my responses in a personal knowledge base. This helps me remember the lessons I've learned and gives me a reference for similar situations down the road. Being able to learn and adapt from feedback is key to becoming a better programmer.

Finally, use this experience as a learning opportunity. Reflect on what the feedback taught you about code design and how it might influence your future work. Consider documenting the critiques and your responses to them in a personal knowledge base. This reflection will help solidify the lessons learned and serve as a reference for tackling similar challenges in the future. The ability to adapt and grow from feedback is a hallmark of a skilled programmer. Embracing continuous improvement ensures that you stay current with best practices and evolving technologies, enhancing your professional development and coding expertise.