Vous êtes confronté à des bugs inattendus lors des tests de jeux. Comment décidez-vous lesquels prioriser en premier ?

To prioritize unexpected bugs in game testing, I assess their impact and urgency. Critical bugs affecting core gameplay or player experience take precedence, as they can significantly disrupt user satisfaction. Next, I focus on time-sensitive issues tied to key milestones or features essential for release.

Categorize bugs into critical, major, and minor. Critical bugs are those that break core gameplay, cause crashes, or prevent progress, and should be addressed first. Major bugs might affect gameplay or user experience significantly but don't render the game unplayable, while minor bugs have minimal impact and can be fixed later. Consider the frequency of occurrence and how many users are affected. Also, take into account the project's timeline and focus on bugs that could delay the release if left unresolved. Prioritize accordingly for efficient resolution.

When deciding which bugs to prioritize, assess their severity and impact on gameplay. Focus first on critical issues that prevent players from progressing or affect core mechanics. Next, tackle high-severity bugs that disrupt user experience, followed by medium and low-severity ones that are annoying but not game-breaking. Keep communication open with your team—getting different perspectives can help you make informed decisions. Finally, don’t forget to document your process; it helps refine future testing and bug-fixing efforts. Happy bug hunting!

In game development, critical bugs that break gameplay or cause crashes are top priority. I've experienced how addressing severe issues immediately ensures the game remains playable, protecting both the player experience and project timelines. Fixing these first also helps avoid compounding problems that can emerge later in development.

In the real world we always try to solve the most critical issues/problem. So is the true for the bugs found while testing. We must always priorities the blockers/show stopper bugs. As these bugs might block the associated team to continue their work. And the same bug is reported in the field then it may block the users work.

Bugs that disrupt core gameplay or affect user enjoyment come next. In my experience, addressing bugs that directly impact the player experience, even if minor, can significantly improve overall satisfaction and retention, making them worth prioritizing.

When I’m faced with unexpected bugs in game testing, I start by tackling the most serious ones first—things like crashes or anything that stops the game from working. Then, I focus on how much the bug impacts players, especially if it affects a lot of people or breaks a key part of the game. After that, I prioritize bugs in important or new features. If a bug happens frequently, it moves up the list as well. Finally, I consider the team’s resources and whether we can fix the bug quickly, as well as the timing of the next update or patch.

Al priorizar los errores, es importante evaluar cuántos jugadores se verán afectados por el problema. Si el error es general y afecta a todos, como un fallo en una misión principal o en un nivel clave, debe resolverse con urgencia para evitar que la mayoría de los usuarios tengan una mala experiencia. Sin embargo, si el error ocurre solo en situaciones muy específicas que pocos jugadores encontrarán, puede postergarse y resolverse más adelante. Priorizar los errores según su impacto asegura que la mayor parte de los jugadores disfruten de una experiencia de juego sin interrupciones significativas.

When facing unexpected bugs during game testing, prioritizing which ones to address first is essential for maintaining project momentum and ensuring a high-quality product.

(This is an odd question - see in my response) Bug prioritization is an art form which is hard to "teach" but you can learn by closely and actively collaborating with an experienced mentor in the same project, and looking at individual bugs as example scenarios. NOTE that every project should be intrinsically 20-30% different in regards to dealing with bugs even though a lot of people in the business pretend to stick to typical 80-70% norms. For User Impact: In gamedev, I have always taken the negative impact users incur from the bug as a "coefficient" in my Severity & Priority decision. The negative "User Impact" in my experience is already an informative Bug Report by testers.

Based on personal experience I always focus on bugs that affect the main mechanics of the game (bugs that stop players from experiencing the game as it was intended e.g the ball gets lost in a football game 😅), when these bugs are fixed and the main mechanics of the game is working properly, I then have the freedom to focus, enhance and fix smaller bugs that don't really stop gameplay (stuff like sounds not being played properly etc)

Bug prioritization is an art form which is hard to "teach" but you can learn by closely and actively collaborating with an experienced mentor in the same project, and looking at individual bugs as example scenarios. NOTE that every project should be intrinsically 20-30% different in regards to dealing with bugs even though a lot of people in the business pretend to stick to typical 80-70% norms. Deciding on Feature Importance: You easily know how important what feature is in your project: - Look at your game's core mechanics coming from its DNA & USP, - Look at the features in _core_ gameplay loop. These are the most important ones as well as - Progression system + save/load, OPTIONS menu working properly. - Crashing core systems

When prioritizing bugs, consider the importance of the affected features. Focus on bugs tied to key gameplay elements that significantly impact player experience. If a feature is central to the game’s appeal, any issues there should be top of your list. Next, look at how frequently players engage with other features—bugs in popular areas deserve swift attention, too. Keep your team's goals in mind; aligning bug fixes with critical milestones can streamline development. Ultimately, addressing high-impact features first not only improves gameplay but also boosts player satisfaction!

Los fallos que afectan las mecánicas principales del juego, como un sistema de creación en un RPG o el motor de física en un juego de carreras, deben corregirse primero, ya que definen la experiencia del jugador. Después de solucionar estos problemas críticos, se pueden abordar errores menores. Además, si una función es muy usada por los jugadores, cualquier error en esa área también requiere atención rápida para mantener la calidad y satisfacción del juego.

Development Stage and Deadlines: The stage of development also plays a role in prioritization. In the early stages, functional and core gameplay bugs should be the focus, while in the later stages, performance, polish, and minor visual glitches become more important. Upcoming milestones or release deadlines will influence which issues need immediate attention.

To effectively manage unexpected bugs, assess your development resources first. Look at your team's capacity and skill sets—who can tackle specific bugs quickly? Allocate resources to fix critical issues first, ensuring you have the right people on the job. If time is tight, consider bringing in additional help or utilizing automation tools for testing and bug tracking. Keep communication flowing; regular check-ins can help reallocate resources as needed. This way, you maximize efficiency and minimize frustration, keeping the project on track!