Votre équipe est divisée sur les stratégies d’atténuation des risques. Comment pouvez-vous aligner tout le monde vers un objectif commun ?

As we navigate the complex landscape of risk mitigation, it's essential that we align diverse perspectives and expertise of our team towards a unified objective. While our individual experiences and scenarios may inform differing approaches, our shared goal of minimizing risks and maximizing success remains constant. To harness the collective power of our team, let's engage in open and empathetic dialogue, seeking to understand the underlying drivers and assumptions that shape our respective strategies. By doing so, we can distill our unique insights into a cohesive and comprehensive risk mitigation plan, one that not only addresses our varied concerns but also leverages our collaborative strength to drive optimal outcomes

To align our team on risk mitigation strategies, we start by clearly defining the common goal and how each strategy contributes to it. Facilitate a discussion where each team member can express their views and concerns. Use data and evidence to highlight the benefits and drawbacks of each strategy. Encourage collaboration by finding common ground and creating a shared understanding of the risks involved. Develop a consensus by focusing on the overall objectives and how the chosen strategy best addresses those goals. Ensure everyone understands their role in implementing the strategy to achieve alignment and commitment.

The first step I would take is to comprehensively identify the various types of risks your organization may encounter, such as financial, operational, strategic, or compliance-related risks. Each type of risk carries distinct characteristics and potential impacts, requiring tailored strategies for mitigation. To align your team around a coherent risk management framework, it’s crucial to establish a common definition of risk that resonates with your organization’s specific projects and objectives. This begins with fostering a culture of open dialogue where people can express diverse perspectives and concerns regarding potential risks.Such discussions help build a shared understanding and collective ownership of the risk management process.

Work together to identify and evaluate risks. Use tools like risk matrices or brainstorming sessions to assess the likelihood and impact of different risks. This collaborative approach ensures that all relevant perspectives are considered

Understanding Risk is core - if people are not aligned on the Real risk faced, you will will solve for the wrong problem. To this end as Risk Practitioners we need to understand the flaw in the COSO model and how to use the model despite the flaw (sometimes it is handy to remind the room - to ensure alignment on this and avoid needless circular debates - another handy reminder is that the vast majority of controls do not reduce impact, they only reduce probability of a risk occurring). Quantify Risk with Data ... always! Otherwise you are reduced to HIPO (Highest Income Personal Opinion) driving the discussion and whilst generally the experience of the HIPO will be correct it is not foolproof. Finally a Picture is Worth a 1000 words!.

Modelling Scenarios using the AMA scenario is a critical method, ensure you: 1. Have diverse perspectives contributing to the "What-If" 2. Use current historical risk data to guide the estimates in the 1 to 2 year bucket. 3. Use older-dated risk data coupled with the differing perspectives of experienced risk practitioners and business leads for longer-dated scenario buckets. 4. Avoid Silo thinking and Convergent thinking, if needed remind team of Divergent Thinking tips. 5. Drive a Collaborative mindset/culture for the session(s).

It will be imperative for our team to join forces to tackle the complex challenge of risk mitigation. Their diverse skills, experiences, & perspectives can create a comprehensive model scenario that simulates potential risks, their consequences, and how they impact our common goals. Through collaborative scenario modeling & quantitative analysis, we'll identify key risks, assess their likelihood & impact, & develop effective strategies to mitigate them. As our team work together, build trust, foster open and transparent communication, & create a shared sense of ownership in our risk mitigation plan. Ultimately, our collective efforts will lead to a unified approach that leverages our strengths, minimizes risks, and drives success

We brainstorm key risks and variables together, our analysts create diverse 'what-if' scenarios. The data scientists build and run Monte Carlo simulations. We collaborate to analyze outcome distributions. Our systems thinkers map risk interactions and test various mitigation strategies in the model. Our visualization experts present results graphically. Together, we review and update the model regularly.

Once we have a clear understanding of the risks and scenarios, it's time to make informed decisions about mitigation strategies. This involves carefully considering the trade-offs of each option, weighing the potential benefits against the potential costs and resource implications. By presenting these evaluations in a clear and transparent way, we can ensure everyone understands the reasoning behind our choices and is aligned with our risk management plan. This collaborative approach will help us select the most effective strategies and move forward with confidence

After evaluating the risks and scenarios, then create a better strategy with options A and option B, of course regarding the budget required for these options. After the management decided, we shared with the team regarding the intended changes and we shared simple and effective work methods, we could use POAC.

Analyze Costs and Benefits: Use cost-benefit analysis or multi-criteria decision-making to assess each strategy. Cost-benefit analysis helps weigh the financial costs against the expected benefits, while multi-criteria decision-making considers various factors like feasibility and impact. Present Clearly: Share the evaluations with your team using simple visuals and clear explanations. This ensures everyone can easily grasp the trade-offs and implications of each strategy. Facilitate Informed Decisions: By quantifying and comparing the different strategies, you enable the team to make decisions that balance individual preferences with the overall goal of effective risk management.

Generate a range of risk mitigation strategies. Evaluate these options based on their effectiveness, feasibility, and alignment with the common goal. Encourage team members to contribute ideas and evaluate alternatives

Use the DMAIC process (Greenbelt) and team building exercises to pinpoint where the divide is among team members. This approach can help align the team's strategy(ies) towards the most efficient risk based approach.

Use structured discussions or voting mechanisms to build consensus on the preferred risk mitigation strategies. Address any concerns or objections to ensure that everyone feels heard and that their input is considered.

A common mistake during implementation is unclear roles. When no one owns a task, execution falters, and things slip through the cracks. Without clear accountability, you get delays and incomplete actions. Also, if communication breaks down, the team loses alignment, and the strategy suffers. Assign clear responsibilities from the start and keep communication open to ensure everyone is on the same page and fully committed to the plan. People need to be receptive to hearing counter consensus views during this phase - any railroading of solutions usually will end in disaster from experience

Strongly believe that consistent monitoring and evaluation are essential to the success of risk mitigation efforts. By establishing clear KPIs and metrics, we can accurately measure the effectiveness of our strategies and make data-driven decisions to optimize them. Regular progress updates and reports will not only keep the team motivated and focused on our shared objectives but also facilitate open communication and collaboration. Moreover, continuous monitoring will enable us to identify areas for improvement, address emerging risks, and adjust our approaches as needed, ensuring that we stay on track and achieve our goals

Steps 1 to 4 are about the plan. Steps 5 & 6 are about execution. Ensure you track solution to resolution. Remember the old adages: 1. A poor plan executed is a better result, than a great plan that is never executed. 2. What is not monitored/measured is not managed. 3. Execution! Execution! Execution!

Failing to monitor progress is a big mistake. Without tracking, you won’t know if your risk mitigation strategies are working or if the team is on track. Focus on leading indicators that predict future success, not just lagging metrics/ KPIs. This approach gives you actionable insights and keeps the team focused. Regular monitoring and reporting ensure everyone stays aligned, allowing for quick adjustments and continuous improvement. Don’t leave progress to chance; measure it and act fast when needed.

I will first talk to the team to set a common goal which everyone must achieve. I will verify if all understand, deligate each member with their tasks and responsibilities, then set time lines, and implement review and monitoring.