Update __cpp_lib_concepts
#2559
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
... to the P1964R2 value of `202002L`. (Yes, we dropped the ball nearly two years ago.)
fsb4000
approved these changes
Feb 11, 2022
StephanTLavavej
approved these changes
Feb 11, 2022
StephanTLavavej
approved these changes
Feb 11, 2022
|
I'm mirroring this to the MSVC-internal repo. Requesting or pushing changes is totally fine, but please notify me if that happens. |
mnatsuhara
approved these changes
Feb 11, 2022
|
Thanks for finding and fixing this ancient bug! 🐞 🔎 ✅ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
... to the post-P1964R2 value of
202002L. (Yes, we dropped the ball nearly two years ago.)I've added this to my unofficial list of things to be sure to backport.
I fully audited SD-6 against our feature-test macros, the only other discrepancy is that we don't define
__cpp_lib_deduction_guideswhich sd-6 does because LWG-3635 hasn't yet decided if we want that macro or not.