[PATCH V2 6/7] drm/amd/pm: drop unnecessary manual mode check

[Lazar, Lijo]

On 8/12/2021 9:31 AM, Evan Quan wrote:
> As the fan control was guarded under manual mode before fan speed
> RPM/PWM setting. Thus the extra check is totally redundant.
> 
> Change-Id: Ia9d776141ec4aa39255accbf00d7e7ed81c8424d
> Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan at amd.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c | 12 +-----------
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c
> index 9001952442ba..20ece0963f51 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/smu_v11_0.c
> @@ -1208,9 +1208,6 @@ smu_v11_0_set_fan_speed_pwm(struct smu_context *smu, uint32_t speed)
>   
>   	speed = MIN(speed, 255);
>   
> -	if (smu_v11_0_auto_fan_control(smu, 0))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -

There is a FAN_CONTROL_NONE mode where it is set to full speed. Is that 
affected by this change?

Thanks,
Lijo

>   	duty100 = REG_GET_FIELD(RREG32_SOC15(THM, 0, mmCG_FDO_CTRL1),
>   				CG_FDO_CTRL1, FMAX_DUTY100);
>   	if (!duty100)
> @@ -1237,11 +1234,6 @@ int smu_v11_0_set_fan_speed_rpm(struct smu_context *smu,
>   	 */
>   	uint32_t crystal_clock_freq = 2500;
>   	uint32_t tach_period;
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	ret = smu_v11_0_auto_fan_control(smu, 0);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * To prevent from possible overheat, some ASICs may have requirement
> @@ -1257,9 +1249,7 @@ int smu_v11_0_set_fan_speed_rpm(struct smu_context *smu,
>   				   CG_TACH_CTRL, TARGET_PERIOD,
>   				   tach_period));
>   
> -	ret = smu_v11_0_set_fan_static_mode(smu, FDO_PWM_MODE_STATIC_RPM);
> -
> -	return ret;
> +	return smu_v11_0_set_fan_static_mode(smu, FDO_PWM_MODE_STATIC_RPM);
>   }
>   
>   int smu_v11_0_get_fan_speed_pwm(struct smu_context *smu,
>