As a Change Leader it's upon the incumbent to get all conflicting voices to the table. Bigger the project and stakes, bigger should be upfront investment in understanding the players, idiosyncrasy of key individuals and team dynamics. Looking for common grounds, defining projects non negotiables and creating the common understanding of the change, the 4Ps of Leading Change, 1. Purpose 2. Picture 3. Plan 4. Part

Use scenario planning to present different potential outcomes of each leader's vision. By modeling the risks and benefits of each approach, we shift the conversation from personal opinions to objective decision-making, helping leaders evaluate the best path forward based on data. Consider implementing hybrid solutions where elements of both visions are combined. This compromise allows each leader to see their input reflected in the final direction, fostering collaboration while still aligning the project with broader organizational goals.

Reúna todos em um mesmo ambiente e use o seguinte roteiro e recursos: - Quadros, Papéis e Pinceis - Ouça todos os pontos de vista - Reúna os pontos semelhantes - Identifique os pontos divergentes - Identifiquei os impactos dos conflitos - Convergir para os pontos de maior importância - Estabelecer Plano de Ação para refletir o consenso no Processo de Mudanças

First, a Change Management professional should assess whether any Senior Leader might oppose the project. This involves frequent communication and maintaining a close pulse on the project. In other words, they should understand the benefits for each stakeholder and identify if their expectations are not being met. It's crucial to proactively address these concerns.

Negotiation and compromise play a big part in aligning top management towards a shared vision. As change management facilitators, we should brainstorm for win win solutions- the outcomes of which should be agreeable to all. If complete agreement is not possible, then prioritizing the concerns is the next step. The concerns which may not be crucial should not be given weight in decision making. Any disagreements, however, should be handled mindfully with open dialogue. While disregarding any concerns, it should be supported by data and evidence.