Quando sua equipe está dividida entre corrigir bugs e adicionar novos recursos, é essencial encontrar um equilíbrio que se alinhe com os objetivos do seu produto. Veja como fazer a chamada:
- Avalie o feedback do cliente para priorizar quais bugs afetam mais a experiência do usuário.
- Avalie o impacto de novos recursos na satisfação do usuário e na estratégia de produto de longo prazo.
- Aloque recursos de forma flexível, permitindo ajustes à medida que as necessidades do usuário e as tendências do mercado evoluem.
Como você determina o equilíbrio em sua equipe? Compartilhe suas estratégias.
-
Balancing bug fixes and new features is key to successful software development. Prioritize bugs that affect functionality or security and schedule new features based on business goals and user needs. Use clear criteria for prioritization, like customer feedback and technical debt. Allocate specific time in each sprint for both tasks and adjust priorities regularly based on feedback and metrics. Communicate transparently with stakeholders to manage expectations and ensure alignment. By integrating these strategies, you can maintain product quality while driving innovation and growth.
-
Balancing bug fixes and new feature development comes down to prioritization. Typically, P0 bugs are addressed first due to their severity. However, a high-severity bug that occurs infrequently (e.g., a Y3K issue) might be given lower priority, while a low-severity bug that is profoundly embarrassing (such as misspelling the company or client's name) may take precedence. After addressing showstopper bugs, the decision to focus on fixes versus features should be guided by business goals and objectives, resource availability, and schedule constraints.
-
To have the best possible balance between bug fixing and new features, some of the most important keys are: - Align with the whole team about the work load related to bugs and features. Everyone has to be aware of both of them. - In accordance with the prioritization of bugs (most/least impacting) and features (deadlines, etc.), time allocation is required for each week. Following a pattern e.g. 30%/70% facilitates organization, but this pattern may change if needed. - To remember: Bugs are fixed by people familiar with the respective domain. Same for new features, in some extent. So, the most effective assignment of bugs/features is recommended.
-
Classify bugs into various risk level on customer and product. Bugs risk level can be high,medium and low levels.High level risk means it has great impact on the product which if not resolved it affect the system greatly. Team can then focus on adding new features as well as resolving other bugs .
-
Balancing bug fixes and new features is a common challenge in software development, and how you approach it can vary depending on the context of the project. You can implement the following framework: 1. Understand the impact => Evaluate the severity of the bugs and Assess how the new features align with business goals and user needs. 2. Consider User Experience => Frequent or severe bugs can lead to user frustration and churn. Ensuring a stable and reliable product is often more important than adding new features. 3. Resource Availability => Engage with business stakeholders to understand their priorities. Are they more concerned with user retention (which might require bug fixes) or market expansion (which might require new features)?
Classificar este artigo
Leitura mais relevante
-
Engenharia de produtoVocê está em desacordo com seu gerente sobre velocidade versus qualidade nos lançamentos de produtos. Como você encontra o equilíbrio certo?
-
Design de produtosVocê está equilibrando correções de bugs e novos recursos em um prazo apertado. Como você decide o que tem prioridade?
-
Gestão de produto de softwareComo equilibrar as métricas de resultado do produto com a qualidade do produto e o débito técnico?
-
Desenvolvimento de produtosComo você equilibra o escopo, o tempo e os recursos do seu projeto com a sua definição de concluído?