Quando sua equipe de codificação está em desacordo sobre as prioridades da tarefa, é essencial orientar para uma resolução que se alinhe com os objetivos do seu projeto. Para garantir que as tarefas certas recebam o foco que merecem:
- Facilitar uma discussão estruturada onde cada membro possa defender a importância de sua tarefa.
- Empregue uma estrutura de priorização como MoSCoW (Deve ter, deveria ter, poderia ter, não terá) para avaliar objetivamente as tarefas.
- Considere o cronograma e as dependências do projeto para orientar as decisões sobre o que precisa de atenção imediata.
Como você lida com a priorização em sua equipe? Sinta-se à vontade para compartilhar sua abordagem.
Discussion is essential, but I understand the situation here as the discussion turning into an argument. So, let's make it effective. Each person should prepare objective evidence and data to persuade others; if there are slides and presentations, even better. After everyone has presented, we will vote to make a decision. Once a decision is made, everyone must agree and follow through.
Facilitating Open Communication: I'd encourage my team members to voice their opinions and concerns about the task priorities. We can do this in a meeting where each person explains why they believe certain tasks are more critical. Listening to different perspectives can bring to light considerations others may have missed.
As a software developer, I've encountered numerous instances of task priority disputes within my coding team, requiring a three-pronged approach to resolve these issues. I facilitate a structured discussion where each member can advocate for their task's importance, creating a safe and respectful space for open communication, while also employing a prioritization framework like MoSCoW (Must have, Should have, Could have, Won't have) to objectively evaluate tasks and rank them based on importance and urgency.