Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Personally - i dislike it - i have grown tired of open-worldification of entire game genres and series. Hubs are still fun, and they should be still around.
I will definitely buy the next RE though, even if it is open world, the series is great.
Where is the Survival Horror in an open world? You can just run away from zombies and never face a locked door. Open World in Resident Evil is a ridiculous idea. Absolute Rubbish.
It won't really be that different from Part 8. In a way the open world is there in both part 4 and 8. But a full open world looks interesting, the only question is how they will implement it. It could be something like Evil Within 2 or as an example could be a concept like 3 and 8 parts. Like take a city district like in part 3 and expand it even more than the Village in 8. RE is still not DD2 or Skyrim. Even with an open world the game is unlikely to be large scale.
japanese game devs cant create a immersive open world. they just cant. i hope they stay with the known formular.
death stranding, dragons dogma 2, Final Fantasy, Tales Of, maybe Yakuza and Persona, Metal Gear
It's not that ♥♥♥ games are the problem, but rather games in general. Finding an interesting open world in general is not that easy