Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
To the first question, the answer is definitely no, it doesn't. Civ IV, V and VI are all demonstrably better than any of the previous Civs (although I do admit to having a favourable opinion of 3) I've played them all since Civ 2 and I can see how things have changed. True, some changes haven't been for the better but overall, it's a better game with far more sophisticated systems. People who think it has gotten worse usually can't get past a particular change (1UPT, the art style, city stares whatever) but I think most of us can see that, overall, it's improved in many respects.
The answer to the final question is 'to make make money'. It's a business and it will continue for as long as it makes money.
So, for me, Civ 4 has been the most well rounded for features and style. I do like some of the things that came with 6 though.
Now, the AI clearly got a lot worse in 5 and 6 compared to the previous games as well. For those who play multi-player, you don't care, but single player against AI civs, yea, there's a lot to be desired.
So, we go on to Civ 7. The idea of having to throw out our civilization because we are in a new age, and in OUR world, certain civilizations died out, so Firaxis decided that they can't be allowed to live on for the entire game through any upheavals? That strikes me as strange. I can see major events and tests that COULD cause it, but if you pass the challenges, we should be able to keep our original civilization all the way through the game. The ability to use rivers for more than just a source of water seems like it is overdue, so that one is going to be very welcome. Even the idea of ages, it's not ALL bad, so I expect it will be something that stays for Civ 8 as well, but with major changes. Art style is a LOT better for 7 than 6, that's for sure.
However, the SoD did keep the player honest, especially on higher difficulties. It wasn't subtle at all. It was just sheer brute force and the AI managed the stacks so badly that folks learned how to counter them. But you couldn't ignore the military to the extent that you can in Civ 5/6.
Lets assign numbers 1-3 to your questions order they were asked.
2. IP gets better in every instalment. Every time it sells more, player play it more and makes more profit to everyone..
3. Answer in question 2.
1. To play the game. Same answer to every game purchase ever.
VI wasn't that great on day 1 but now it's incredible.
♥♥♥♥ a huge list of issues people have with the game can typically be resolved or at least alleviated with mods.
of doom ruined an otherwise excellent game.
No they are not, and your answer makes no sense tbh.
Fact is that civ 6 is biggest ever sales of civilizations. As 5 was before it and so on. So from perspective of question 2 ” Doesnt this IP get worse every time?” sales figures do not support this. It is not matter of opinion, it is fact and naturally thus follows that firaxis keep doing it because they are more and more succesful every time.
As for why buy question usually those who want to play this game buy it and those who do not want to play do not buy it.
Individually you can say ip gets worse or anything, but it has no relevance in context of the questions.
It's not like they're releasing new CIVs every year. Or even every 2-3 years.
Now I do understand that in some ways, the series on the surface may look like its regressing (graphically the new leaders, smaller maps/limitations on map size, limitations on players, or an AI that doesn't always do well with the current rule set), but in general each one feels and plays (even looks) distinctly unique while still being Civilization at its core.
Nothing requires you to purchase the latest one or even to stop playing an older one. But as a business, they can't just sit back and do nothing for years at a time.