Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
This is a discussion that goes similarly to the AI discussion though. There are a lot of factors to how a human might want to distribute factions on a map so each has a fair chance. How would you do it? What parameters would you tell the programmers that they must consider when writing code to spawn leaders?
* Equidistance? - do we want leaders to be reasonably well spread across the map?
* Buffer distance? - is there a certain range that we want to guarantee other leaders will not spawn within?
* Natural barriers/city-states - these naturally block off expansion. You can't expand into the ocean, into mountains, or into a neighboring city-state, so should there be some sort of check to ensure there is viable space for a 2nd and/or 3rd city nearby?
* Resources? - whether they're luxuries, strategics, or bonuses, these can make or break your early game. Do want to ensure that a certain number are within close proximity? soft cap? hard cap?
* Start biases - different civs have different start biases intended to reflect their real-life geographies. This is necessary because a lot of civs have unique tile improvements or leader bonuses connected to the land or certain uses of the land. How strict should these be?
As you can see, some of this can end up getting to be quite complicated to do, especially if you're trying to ensure some sense of actual randomness and variability map to map and game to game.
How might you do it?