Field of Glory II: Medieval

Field of Glory II: Medieval

View Stats:
Red Dragon 16 Dec, 2024 @ 12:37pm
FoG II: Medieval vs FoG II
I have two questions:
> Which one should I play first - FoG II or FoG II Medieval?
> If I end up only playing one of them, which one should I rather play? (All dlcs included).

I don't have a high affinity towards either time period, I don't feel one time period is more interesting than the other. So this is a lot more about diversity of mechanics, tactics, and how interesting the battles tend to be rather than anything else.

For example: I saw FoG II has some truly huge battles, not sure I have the infinite patience. Real medieval conflicts on the other hand tended to be much smaller in scale - are there fewer units on the field on average or did they scale both games to get similar numbers? I think I prefer mostly smaller battles/skirmishes with maybe the odd huge battle once every blue moon rather than the other way around.
< >
Showing 1-6 of 6 comments
piosue 16 Dec, 2024 @ 1:20pm 
They are both very similar but medieval looks a little sharper. They both have tons of historical battles and campaigns that are pretty big affairs. But you can play sandbox campaigns or battles and set the size however you want it (tiny/small/medium/large/huge). You can even set campaigns to start small and get gradually bigger each battle as you go.

Which one you pick and which DLC you get really does depend on which armies you like. I prefer the ancients because Rome. Also I like infantry heavy army and medieval seems more knights and cavalry.
Last edited by piosue; 16 Dec, 2024 @ 1:23pm
Athos1660 16 Dec, 2024 @ 10:26pm 
Both are worth equally. It is a matter of taste about the time period. Units, weapons, graphics... are differents. Buy both if you can.
PatRat 17 Dec, 2024 @ 6:52am 
Steam winter sale begins in a couple of days. There's a chance one or both will be on sale.
Red Dragon 17 Dec, 2024 @ 9:48am 
I already have them both actually from a previous really good deal, I think also fanatical. I was just wondering which one I should play. I played both a little bit and couldn't really feel that much of a difference. Hoped some veterans have an opinion beyond "just go with the period that you like better" when I don't have a clear preference.

The thing is I have a million games by now, and I keep bouncing around too much. I want to focus on a couple of games at a time and finish/master them so I kind of need to plan a bit otherwise I put a few hours in here and there but never play anything "seriously".
Last edited by Red Dragon; 17 Dec, 2024 @ 9:50am
quark 17 Dec, 2024 @ 9:57am 
- you should not worry about confising the rules - there are minor differences, but overall both games rely on the same ruleset with a few tweaks

- the unit size is tweaked depending on scenario for historical battles in FOG II, and in Medieval there is also a modifier that scales unit size for custom games depending on the involved armies. Both games contain some historical huge battles and you can create either tiny or giant custom battles in both (for some armies in Medieval the unit size will scale, but this will not affect the number of units)
< >
Showing 1-6 of 6 comments
Per page: 1530 50