Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Discussions Rules and Guidelines
2 
Report this post
1070ti in 2025...
Go upgrade your 10 year old pc.
Bruh why was the first thing you did is go through my profile? My personal PC has nothing to do with the post, the recommend specifications recommend frame generation for base HD. That's retarded.
Your personal pc has nothing to do with the post but you said that you don't want to pay to upgrade it in the post?
Bro why is steam forums worse than reddit now what happened ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. I'm asking if they're going to change the system requirements on launch. That's it, that's the inquiry.
I was waiting to see them change so I can buy upgrades relative to MH wilds. As it stands right now I am not buying said upgrades because the value of these upgrades far exceeds the value of whatever this video game has to offer. Is that breakdown satisfactory for you?
Why do some folks think developers should never push themselves towards the next level? To always stay stagnant? Weird. Weird mentality to have.
Nah they should make games for my Pentium 2 and 3Dfx Voodoo card
Why try to exactly meet the minimum or recommended system requirements of this game? You probably would be losing price/performance doing that especially since some of that is old hardware already with not as good upgradability paths.
Yes the system requirements will likely change but that doesn't matter if you're buying a new computer, you should buy the best components you can afford at a reasonable price.
Since it's likely the release shouldn't run any worse than the beta, then build around the beta something that ran it relatively fine, aka try to get a 8 core CPU and a decent 12gb vram GPU, something like ryzen 7 5700 or 5800x3d, ryzen 7 7700 or up, or i7 12700 or better. For GPU try getting rx 6700 xt or 4070 and better, even 3060 is fine since it has a lot of vram for its performance but it's a bit outdated to be buying in 2025 now.
It depends also what kind of graphical settings, resolution and framerate you would be happy with, your current PC would probably run the game but might not reach consistent 60 fps, try the beta and if you're happy then don't even upgrade, it's basically on the current minimum requirements though.
If you want the best experience possible then you need to shell out big money to get a 4090/5080/5090 to play at 4k at very high framerates (100 fps+), if that's something you want.
Capcom has done that for all theyr recent PC games since MHW so I am nto sure why you're so upset about that. It's like you didnt read those too cause you where able to run a game from 2017/18.
Upgrading PC should be done every 5 years. Not 10 years lol.
Firstly, if someone complains about performance and the like and don't give any insight into their own specs, I generally check their profile, just in case like me, they have them there.
In regards to frame generation, this will become common place in new release titles. Graphic cards are no longer simply about the hardware but the software sorcery they bring with it, and the 50 series cards has multi frame generation technology, so this isn't going away.
Your 1080ti, while great back then, it showing its age now, particularly in terms of VRAM. DLSS 4 coming on the 30th of January and is only going back as far as 20 series cards. Sadly for you, if you want to play these new triple A release titles, it might be time for an upgrade.
They can at least use FSR and AMD frame gen tech, but they are still realistically looking at 1080p low/medium.
Push themselves towards the next level of what? bad optimization? because yeah developers sure are doing more of that these days.
Or are you honestly telling me that MH Wilds looks better than any other modern open world game? Does it looks better than Elden Ring, where every screen shot is a painting? Does it look better than Forbidden West or the GoW remake where I can make out individual hair follicles on Kratos' nipples? Does it look better than AC valhalla with it's detailed sprawling English countryside?
What's the real difference between those mentioned above and MH wilds? My old PC can run all of those games on high settings at 1080p with no frame gen at 60fps. ER doesn't even use any upscaling. That's the difference.
You gonna sit there and tell me with a straight face that MH wilds looks so much better visually that it justifies the hardware required to run it? Really?
People in this thread are actually defending frame generation for games that look visually indistinguishable from other titles in the genre unless inspected pixel by pixel with a microscope, insane.
Again, we can't comment on optimisation yet because THE GAME HASN'T RELEASED.
This libellous snotty behaviour really is pathetic.
Yes, MH Wilds looks remarkably good, just because it's in a desert setting doesn't mean it doesn't look good.
The sheer amount of detail in the grass, fur and textures is insane, frankly.
And where the polygons have been culled to save on performance has been fair and logical (in obscure parts of the scenery you shouldn't really be staring at for too long anyway)
So yes, straight face, the quality of the gameplay we saw in the beta justifies the hardware requirements, absolutely.