Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Is it not my 9 votes for option B vs Shaka's 4 votes for himself?
Exactly. First, the votes for option A or B are tallied. Then the decision is made among the winning resolution.
In order to defeat Shaka, you would have had to have put in 17 (or more) votes.
first is the question vanilla or choco icecream.
most ppl choose vanilla, you alone choose choco, so vanilla is what is buyed.
after that its subvoted under the ones who choose vanilla who will get the biggest part, you dont wanted vanilla, so you are out of that and get nothing.
its called voteing. most "legal" votes get the win.
Why even have option B at all, since everyone always votes for themselves so it's borderline impossible to have enough diplomatic points to make B happen? Have you seen AI ever vote for B?
You don't understand because you considere your way of playing as the only way of playing.
Have you considere team games ? 3v3v3v3 ? 4v4 ?
Have you considere multiplayer ?
How do you think diplomatic victory occurs in competitive games ? ^^
You can game the system that way, too.
If you know everyone is going to vote for Option A, then you also vote for Option A. You'll get a Diplomatic Victory point for agreeing with everyone else. And if it is the resolution where a person is awarded 2 victory points and you sink in enough diplomatic favor to vote for yourself, then you could end up with three!
That's fair, I didn't consider multiplayer.
Well, do you not think I have a valid reason to say it misses the point of the vote to do a split first on option A/B when it comes to voting for a specific player to get something, at least in singleplayer?
Seeing from the comments, maybe I'm the minority and everyone else is happy with this implementation. At least I know better how it works now.