DOOM: The Dark Ages
กระทู้นี้ได้ถูกล็อคแล้ว
Possible wokeness in Doom Dark Ages
According to Peter Scully Doom: The Dark Ages will have a multiplayer mode, nothing new so far, Doom 2016 and Doom Eternal had one to, so what's the problem?

Well they found LGBT CHARMS for the pre-lobby avatar in the Doom Eternal directory that will most likely be re-utilized for Doom the Dark Ages since they weren't used in Eternal. (It's common for Devs to put things in older games that will be repurposed for future ones i.e. GTA)

Keep in mind that they might not do this, but just in case i already decided not to pre-order to see at the release if they have such stuff.
< >
กำลังแสดง 1-15 จาก 123 ความเห็น
better rage bait than the last ones i saw. still weird though.
Considering id Software has been part of Xbox Gaming Studios after DOOM Eternal and XGS is a client of Sweet Baby, Inc., be sure to find Woke content in DOOM TDA, especially among the people of Agent D'Nur, the NPCs, Skins, Icons... no more "Mortally Challenge" Jokes here :steamsad:.
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Grampire:
Blocked.
Will you block me too? :steamhappy:
always be aware of dei infestation
What’s wrong with having an option for players to select an LGBT avatar to represent them in multiplayer?
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Sar:
What’s wrong with having an option for players to select an LGBT avatar to represent them in multiplayer?
everythjing
Well, i'll preorder it anyway. Doom is love. Doom is life.
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Orkhepaj:
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Sar:
What’s wrong with having an option for players to select an LGBT avatar to represent them in multiplayer?
everythjing
How so?
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย Sar; 3 ก.ค. @ 1: 35pm
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Sar:
What’s wrong with having an option for players to select an LGBT avatar to represent them in multiplayer?
It has to go both ways, you can include lgbt stuff, but you also HAVE to let me put a swastika in my profile (the hindu one, as i myself are hinduist ).
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย Ferenc Puskás; 3 ก.ค. @ 1: 40pm
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DaxNovu:
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Sar:
What’s wrong with having an option for players to select an LGBT avatar to represent them in multiplayer?
It has to go both ways, you can include lgbt stuff, but you also HAVE to let me put a swastika in my profile (the hindu one, as i myself are hinduist ).

I think you're a nazi lol

the hindus dont use that symbol for anything except decorations, so does buddhist temples and mosques. So everything points towards you being a nazi, who's jealous of the lgbt getting representation even in the smallest form 🤔

in fact a lot of this anti-woke stuff can be traced down to antisemitic conspiracies.
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย Rico Raccoon; 3 ก.ค. @ 9: 59pm
First world problem.
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DaxNovu:
It has to go both ways, you can include lgbt stuff, but you also HAVE to let me put a swastika in my profile (the hindu one, as i myself are hinduist ).
So swastika is a symbol of hindu heterosexuals? I had no idea...
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Sar:
What’s wrong with having an option for players to select an LGBT avatar to represent them in multiplayer?

Its resources spent on divisive political identitarian ideology. Games aren't about representation. If that were the case, there would be morbidly obese mouth-breathing player characters that cant walk up stairs.

Not all gay, bi, trans etc people support the LGBT ideology, to equate the two is incredibly stereotypical.
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย Lord Bennington; 4 ก.ค. @ 8: 52am
< >
กำลังแสดง 1-15 จาก 123 ความเห็น
ต่อหน้า: 1530 50