安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
They have to draw the line somewhere and a 6 person family who all share their games is already pretty high.
You say you have 9 people, the next person has 12 people in his household and so on.
The simple fact is just that they cant accommodate everyone with the family share system.
They have to limit it at some point to prevent abuse and to not have the game publishers simply opt out of the system.
Dont forget its 100% voluntary on the publishers part if they add their games to family share.
It sucks in your case but there is just no 100% good solution that pleases everyone.
They could definitely lower the cooldowns to switch family members though, a year is way too long.