32
Products
reviewed
1484
Products
in account

Recent reviews by Angry Trash

< 1  2  3  4 >
Showing 1-10 of 32 entries
1 person found this review helpful
1 person found this review funny
6.5 hrs on record
Don't buy this. There is a boss that's completely broken, fits nowhere with the rest of the game, and seemingly has no intent to be fixed. The boss has repeat invincibility phases with a timer tied to its pixel art and at the end of this deals 66% of your health instantly in damage that you can only dodge if you possess a single second invincibility power. Phase 2 combines this with unavoidable attacks with no prompting, and enemy units that never despawn and deal area damage that can make the entire room deal instantly lethal levels.

Games with Hardcore modes should not have bosses this broken.

Edit: Tried again after numerous patches, only to find they made existing builds worse and I instantly died despite there "totally being an immunity zone", avoid this game, do something better and more fun with your time like file taxes.
Posted 24 November, 2024. Last edited 9 December, 2024.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
5 people found this review helpful
3.2 hrs on record (2.0 hrs at review time)
Early Access Review
I want to like and recommend this game, but I just can't. The same issue I raised when it first released at the start of the year has never been addressed. You can flat out and entirely lose the game to RNG with the risk factor event in your first two months of play, maybe if it didn't seem like the intent was the players should be able to impact where it landed it would scathe a little less but I will remain adamant that an instant and unavoidable loss condition at the start of the game (you either go bankrupt by not hitting the article, or you go bankrupt because you hit the article and the mob destroys literally every work station you have because you need to choose between security or actually having enough people to fill a paper) is terrible design if you have no way to work around horrible RNG.

I'll change this if the devs ever address the issue, but my hopes are non-existent because this and target articles have been community gripes since the beginning.
Posted 15 November, 2024.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
6.4 hrs on record (6.1 hrs at review time)
I recommend this game, it's cute and the logic puzzles aren't very difficult except for a few times where the change might be subtle or look almost identical to something else. I do wish there was more upgrades so I could display more fossils, I like collecting them.
Posted 2 November, 2024.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
50 people found this review helpful
2
12.8 hrs on record (12.5 hrs at review time)
Early Access Review
I used to recommend this game to everyone in my gaming chats. I no longer do.

I loved the flexibility of the cooking system and brewing system. The devs kicked that down the stairs. With the newest big update you need twice as many machines as before, and can ONLY make things with one or two specific ingredients. Everything I bought the game for was pretty much entirely removed in a baffling move by the developers and I frankly hate it now because it's become no different from any of the other cooking sims in my library.
Posted 15 September, 2024.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
137.6 hrs on record (135.5 hrs at review time)
Still one of the most solid tycoon games out there a decade later. Feels like this singularly brought up the game dev genre, and while many of them get into the fine details a lot better and more cohesively than this I don't think any of them are as approachable. Has a dedicated mod community that allows you to make pretty much any game you can think of, though you do need to be careful because its rating pattern is based on your last game and also how saturated things are with extensions and your score history (the good news is this also means if you've made a lot of flops consecutively it'll give you a mercy average) your game can be so good it's bad.
Posted 12 May, 2024.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
1.6 hrs on record
I wanted to like this. For a while I did. Problem is, a single mission proved all of the issues with the physics system entirely and made the whole game frustrating and not worth trying to progress a single mission more. The Hiker is bad and inconsistent, 50% was the most I ever managed to get with it after ~50 minutes and over three dozen attempts where every other mission up to this point which didn't rely so heavily on the physics alone was a smooth and intuitive 100% in one go when you tried for it. That kind of disparity is insane, and this single mission feels like it's RNG based.
Posted 12 May, 2024.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
3 people found this review helpful
63.4 hrs on record (49.1 hrs at review time)
Was a good game, unfortunately Sony's decided to implement post launch changes to their EULA and PSN website which in turn violate the law in a significant portion of countries they are selling this game in. 75% of regions played currently will be shut down on the 30th because of PSN being unavailable in those countries. In the EU, Australia, and yes even America, the substantial changes they made violate contract and consumer laws as well. If you pressed the skip button, you did not sign a consent agreement. A purchase is not flat consent, that's why all other data agreements in modern games cannot be skipped. An agreed upon contract, regardless, cannot be changed without consent of both signatory parties and requires a rider for substantive changes like price correction or denial of service which this is.

Edit: 8 Months after launch, instead of implementing the moderating and community management everyone had been asking for from launch, the company chose instead to remove the report feature entirely. The report button is still there, of course, but every option is listed as a non-reportable offense, which is just shy of telling the player to go ♥♥♥♥ themselves.
Posted 4 May, 2024. Last edited 25 October, 2024.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
50 people found this review helpful
0.4 hrs on record
Early Access Review
If you go into the discussions area, you'll find one of the last posts the Devs made was that - while they "aren't happy" about it, the game CANNOT and WILL NOT be worked on. It will be left in Early Access forever. New Buyers wouldn't know this unless they checked discussions first, which most don't. The Devs had said "well if you aren't happy with this, sorry, Steam sets the refund policy not us." Which is true, but what they could set is the price for a game they have admitted to be abandoned to reflect the fact it has less content than many of those 5$ puzzle hentai games that roll out twice a week on the front page, and publicly announce on the store page it has been abandoned.
Posted 25 February, 2024.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
72.4 hrs on record (59.4 hrs at review time)
Extremely satisfying gameplay loop, great visuals, and great soundtrack. Really nice restaurant simulation and 'fishing' game if you want something less hectic in its pacing than "Cook, Serve, Delicious!" but not as tedious as an actual fishing game either. Honestly the only thing I'd want from a sequel is the ability to cook/customize meals yourself, but that's just something that's absent in a lot of restaurant sim types (and less applicable here as you're basically just the hired help).
Posted 21 November, 2023.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
3 people found this review helpful
1 person found this review funny
2.9 hrs on record (0.6 hrs at review time)
For max on Starfield:
OS: Windows 10/11 with updates.
Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 3600X, Intel i5-10600K.
Memory: 16 GB RAM.
Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080.
DirectX: Version 12.
Network: Broadband Internet connection.
Storage: 125 GB available space.

Minimum for CS2 :
OS: Windows® 10 Home 64 Bit
Processor: Intel® Core™ i7-6700K | AMD® Ryzen™ 5 2600X
Memory: 8 GB RAM
Graphics: Nvidia® GeForce™ GTX 970 (4 GB) | AMD® Radeon™ RX 480 (8 GB)
Storage: 60 GB available space

Which one of these two can a Windows 11 computer with an Intel 12700k, 32GB of RAM, and 3070ti 8GB run at double digits after two hotfixes and their recommended bandaid graphics settings? Well, I hope you can guess based on this review.
Posted 4 November, 2023.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
< 1  2  3  4 >
Showing 1-10 of 32 entries