Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This is especially important if you drop the napalm in front of the enemy and they retreat BACKWARDS away from your units, and not forward towards your units out in the open.
Napalm is also very easy to dodge, especially in 1v1 games, especially when you take into account that only 1 napalm plane exists with the a large drop pattern, the American Napalm Phantom.
In WGRD, the only good napalm plane really is the czech thermo mig.
i used to accept it without questioning, but somehow napalm is useful in warno, so i want to get an explanation for it.
I actually think LSTR-40 at elite is the best way to do it - when you pair them up with FJB-40 at elite, they are monsters.
You can make the argument that LSTR staying at veteran is acceptable considering you mainly take them for the vampyr, however, keep in mind that upvetting special forces is not always easy, and having the at elite already gives them a much higher chance to crit enemy units, and make their legality against infantry and vehicles that much more pronounced.
Not if they are LSTR in a national deck where you can get 10 and they are guaranteed to vet up every time they are used.