Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
If I had to chose what tanks to use as a commander of an army I would chose Sherman/T-34 and the reason why is that you could produce them in huge numbers, they could move on tracks while still not failing mechanically, no trains needed to relocate them and most where always combat ready.
I think no nation reached the perfect solution of making a MBT in time during WWII.
Maybe the tank that saw combat and was more closer to a modern MBT was the Pershing, but it saw intensive combat just later in Korea.
I think the best mix was achieved by british in 1944 by combining regular 75mm Sherman/Cromwell + Sherman Firefly, they had numbers,reliability etc and when needed they had huge firepower too ( 17 pdr one of the best if not the best cannon of WWII )