Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Purity would want to use robots to keep the all important baseline humans safe.
Also, from a symbolic stand-point, 4 is always better (Earth, Air, Fire, Water sort of thing) You get the more mechanical affinities (Purity & Synergy) along with the more biological ones (Harmony & Supremacy) each with their own focus.
Or perhaps something where the missile rovers damage doesn't drop as fast when it is below the targets strength. Allowing it to maintain more consistant damage even when out gunned. They would be the natural choice for defending against more advanced units. Maybe the pre-patch Battlesuits wouldn't have had to come down in strength so much if there was a counter to their high strength that wasn't also a level 6 unit.
The generic units seem to follow the clasic military unit types. The unique units got with a futuristic direction although more in flavor than function, given that we don't know for sure what function they will have in the future.
Supremacy does the all drone, all the time route. Purity showing an aversion to AI has classical sci-fi one man armies via mech suits and the super strong, super light materials in hover vehicles. Harmony using miasma is more in keeping with what we'd expect biowarfare to look like. While the units with the extra strength alone perk fit the one man (unit) army role better than purity.
If population itself was a resourse for the military then the difference between fielding robots, humans, or non-human organisms would be a factor.
But really, at the beginning, we're looking very much of an infantry based world. Of course the biggest issue I see is people are probably the most strategic asset of Planet. You'd expect more emphasis on drones, robots and Bolos/Ogres.
Beyond Earth seems like an oportunity to break that since it doesn't start with catapults. And as has been noticed by just about everyone, the other ranged units work just fine against cities. So perhaps artillery should find a new role rather than try and fit the old one.
That being said, this is a good use of fixing something I've been noticing a lot lately.