popular sovereignty
Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.
- University of of Pennsylvania Carey Law School - Legal Scholarship Repository - The Very Idea of Popular Sovereignty: “We the People” Reconsidered
- Academia - Popular Sovereignty: social convention or social rule?
- LSU Scholarly Repository - The Failure of Popular Sovereignty: Slavery, Manifest Destiny, and the Radicalization of Southern Politicsthe Radicalization of Southern Politics
- Saylor Academy - Popular sovereignty
- University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository - Theory of Popular Sovereignty
- Essential Civil War Curriculum - Popular Sovereignty
- The Kansas City Public Library - Civil War on the Western Border - Popular Sovereignty
popular sovereignty, in U.S. history, a controversial political doctrine according to which the people of federal territories should decide for themselves whether their territories would enter the Union as free or slave states. Its enemies, especially in New England, called it “squatter sovereignty.”
It was first applied in organizing the Utah and New Mexico territories in 1850. Its most crucial application came with the passage of U.S. Sen. Stephen A. Douglas’s Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which repealed the prohibition of slavery north of latitude 36°30′ (established in the Missouri Compromise of 1820). The violent struggle that followed for control of the Kansas Territory (see Bleeding Kansas) illustrated the failure of popular sovereignty as a possible ground for agreement between proslavery and antislavery factions in the country. See also Dred Scott decision.