How the Trump administration is reshaping Medicaid
Republican-led states are using waivers to impose work requirements for the first time ever
AMERICAN lawmakers are acutely afraid of rewarding the loafing poor. For that reason, Congress has set strict work requirements on federal food assistance and cash welfare. The Trump administration is now steadily doing the same for Medicaid, as America’s health-insurance programme for the poor is known. On January 11th the Centres of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a memo inviting states to apply for waivers that would include “work and community engagement requirements” on the theory that this would both improve health and help families “rise out of poverty and attain independence”. Ten states, all Republican-led, quickly took up the offer. Michigan, another Republican-controlled state, has contemplated a waiver of its own which would impose some of the strictest work requirements yet seen. The impetus is less financial than moral—an attempt to sort the deserving poor from the chaff.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Will work for health care”
United States May 19th 2018
- Donald Trump wants tough justice—with one exception
- California’s primaries are the most unpredictable in America
- The Supreme Court lets Americans lose money in a new way
- How the Trump administration is reshaping Medicaid
- Missouri’s governor is likely to be impeached
- Democrats have plenty of anger, but few good ideas
Discover more
Many Americans can decide their own policies. What will they choose?
Three issues will dominate state ballot measures in November
Hurricane Helene was America’s deadliest storm in nearly two decades
It wiped out North Carolina’s mountain towns
Crypto bros v cat ladies: gender and the 2024 election
How the campaigns are exploiting and reshaping the battle of the sexes
A ports strike shows the stranglehold one union has on trade
East coast longshoremen are already among America’s best-paid manual workers
The vice-presidential debate was surprisingly cordial
Its high-minded tone worked to J.D. Vance’s advantage
Tim Walz is the most popular candidate on either ticket
How much difference does that make?