How can you evaluate the effectiveness of housing policies?

Housing policies are designed to address various social, economic, and environmental challenges related to the provision and affordability of housing. However, how can you evaluate the effectiveness of these policies in achieving their intended outcomes and impacts? In this article, you will learn about some of the key steps and methods for conducting a housing policy evaluation, as well as some of the challenges and limitations that you may encounter along the way.

1 Define the evaluation purpose and scope

The first step in any policy evaluation is to define the purpose and scope of the evaluation. What are the main questions that you want to answer? Who are the intended users and beneficiaries of the evaluation? What are the resources and time available for the evaluation? These factors will help you to determine the appropriate evaluation approach, design, and methods that suit your specific context and needs.

Add your perspective

Jean-Pierre Feyaerts
Report contribution
A housing policy is not necessarily a public policy or a private sector policy. Ex nihilo, there is no reason to favor one or another approach. Eventually, a default approach is to leave it to the private sector as long as the latter provides good outcomes (to be however defined). A public intervention is interesting if some shortcomings are identified or the overall result is bad. So, essentially, this is a sociological as well as a political choice. Then, one has to identify the best level of intervention (subsidiarity). The third level is the type of action. It is likely preferable to define framework rules and conditions for a mangement contract with a third party. The fourth level is indeed the evaluation itself of what was chosen.

Like

2 Identify the policy goals and indicators

The next step is to identify the policy goals and indicators that will be used to measure the effectiveness of the housing policy. Policy goals are the broad statements of what the policy aims to achieve, such as increasing housing supply, improving housing quality, or reducing homelessness. Indicators are the specific and measurable variables that reflect the progress and performance of the policy, such as the number of housing units built, the percentage of households in adequate housing, or the rate of homelessness.

Add your perspective

3 Collect and analyze the data

The third step is to collect and analyze the data that will inform the evaluation. Data can be collected from various sources, such as surveys, interviews, focus groups, administrative records, or secondary data. Data analysis can involve different methods, such as descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, content analysis, or cost-benefit analysis. The choice of data collection and analysis methods depends on the type and quality of data available, the evaluation questions, and the evaluation design.

Add your perspective

Scott Engmann

Executive Director, Black Hills Area Habitat for Humanity
Report contribution
Often policies are hijacked for political ends, and it is key to stay focused on the data. When data is understood in historical context, it can help guide sound decisions.

Like

4 Compare the results with the counterfactual

The fourth step is to compare the results of the data analysis with the counterfactual, which is the hypothetical scenario of what would have happened in the absence of the housing policy. This comparison allows you to estimate the causal effect of the policy on the indicators of interest, and to isolate the policy impact from other factors that may influence the outcomes. The counterfactual can be constructed using different methods, such as randomized experiments, quasi-experiments, or statistical models.

Add your perspective

5 Assess the strengths and weaknesses of the policy

The fifth step is to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the housing policy based on the results of the comparison with the counterfactual. This assessment should consider not only the effectiveness of the policy in achieving its goals, but also its efficiency, equity, sustainability, and relevance. The assessment should also identify the factors that enable or constrain the policy implementation and outcomes, such as the political, institutional, economic, and social contexts.

Add your perspective

6 Communicate and disseminate the evaluation findings

The final step is to communicate and disseminate the evaluation findings to the relevant stakeholders and audiences. This step involves preparing and presenting the evaluation report, which should summarize the main findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the evaluation. The report should also highlight the limitations and uncertainties of the evaluation, and suggest areas for further research or improvement. The report should be communicated and disseminated in a clear, concise, and accessible way, using appropriate formats and channels, such as publications, presentations, or online platforms.

Add your perspective

7 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

Add your perspective

How can you evaluate the effectiveness of housing policies?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 Define the evaluation purpose and scope

2 Identify the policy goals and indicators

3 Collect and analyze the data

4 Compare the results with the counterfactual

5 Assess the strengths and weaknesses of the policy

6 Communicate and disseminate the evaluation findings

7 Here’s what else to consider

Public Administration

Rate this article

Thanks for your feedback

More articles on Public Administration

More relevant reading