Let's say you want to use the expectancy-value model to understand consumer decision-making for buying a laptop. You define four alternatives (A, B, C, and D) and four attributes (performance, design, price, and warranty). You conduct a survey and collect data on consumer beliefs and preferences for each alternative and attribute. You calculate the expectancy and value scores using a five-point scale, where 1 means low and 5 means high. You multiply the expectancy and value scores to obtain the attitude scores. The table below shows the results.
| Alternative | Attribute | Expectancy | Value | Attitude |
|-------------|-----------|------------|-------|----------|
| A | Performance | 4 | 5 | 20 |
| A | Design | 3 | 4 | 12 |
| A | Price | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| A | Warranty | 4 | 2 | 8 |
| B | Performance | 3 | 5 | 15 |
| B | Design | 4 | 4 | 16 |
| B | Price | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| B | Warranty | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| C | Performance | 5 | 5 | 25 |
| C | Design | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| C | Price | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| C | Warranty | 5 | 2 | 10 |
| D | Performance | 2 | 5 | 10 |
| D | Design | 5 | 4 | 20 |
| D | Price | 4 | 3 | 12 |
| D | Warranty | 2 | 2 | 4 |
As you can see, all the alternatives have the same total attitude score, which means that consumers are indifferent among them. However, you can also see that different attributes have different weights and impacts on consumer attitudes. For example, performance is the most important attribute, followed by design, price, and warranty. You can also see that alternative C has the highest performance score, but the lowest price score, while alternative D has the opposite pattern. This suggests that consumers have different trade-offs and compromises when choosing a laptop.