How does EIA for air quality management differ from EIA for other environmental factors?

1 Air quality standards

One of the main differences between EIA for air quality management and EIA for other environmental factors is the existence of air quality standards. These are legal or regulatory limits on the concentrations of specific air pollutants in the ambient air, such as particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. Air quality standards are often based on scientific evidence and international agreements, and they aim to protect human health and the environment from the adverse effects of air pollution. EIA for air quality management must comply with these standards and demonstrate how the proposed project or policy will not cause or contribute to their exceedance.

2 Air quality modeling

Another difference between EIA for air quality management and EIA for other environmental factors is the use of air quality modeling. This is a mathematical representation of the physical and chemical processes that affect the dispersion, transformation, and deposition of air pollutants in the atmosphere. Air quality modeling can help estimate the current and future levels of air pollutants in a given area, as well as their sources and receptors. EIA for air quality management must use appropriate and reliable air quality models to predict the impacts of the proposed project or policy on the ambient air quality and compare them with the baseline conditions and the air quality standards.

3 Air quality monitoring

A third difference between EIA for air quality management and EIA for other environmental factors is the need for air quality monitoring. This is the systematic measurement and analysis of the concentrations of air pollutants in the ambient air, using various instruments and methods. Air quality monitoring can provide accurate and timely data on the actual state of the air quality and the effectiveness of the mitigation measures. EIA for air quality management must include a plan for air quality monitoring during and after the implementation of the proposed project or policy, as well as a mechanism for reporting and reviewing the results.

4 Air quality mitigation

A final difference between EIA for air quality management and EIA for other environmental factors is the range and complexity of the air quality mitigation options. These are the actions or strategies that can reduce or prevent the emissions or impacts of air pollutants from the proposed project or policy. Air quality mitigation can involve technical, operational, behavioral, or policy measures, such as using cleaner fuels, installing emission controls, optimizing traffic management, promoting public transport, or implementing emission trading schemes. EIA for air quality management must identify and evaluate the feasible and effective air quality mitigation options and incorporate them into the design and operation of the proposed project or policy.

5 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?