How can you draft a patent application that meets your organization's investor needs?

To draft a patent application meeting investor needs: 1. Focus on comprehensive innovation description, ensuring broad yet precise claims for extensive protection. 2. Highlight commercial viability, market potential, and technology's edge over competitors. 3. Address scalability and future adaptability. 4. Ensure clarity, conciseness, and adherence to legal standards to facilitate a smooth patent grant process, enhancing investor confidence in the potential return on investment.

Crafting a patent application that transcends the conventional, I delve into the investor psyche to encapsulate not just the innovation but its inherent market dominance potential. Seamlessly aligning the patent narrative with the investor's hunger for disruption, I strategically infuse technical details with a narrative arc that resonates with their risk appetite. This patent isn't just protection; it's a blueprint for a lucrative future that tantalizes the investor's imagination and leaves them yearning to be part of the revolution.

To draft a patent application that meets an organization's investor needs: - Collaborate closely with inventors to understand the core innovation. - Ensure the patent aligns with the organization's business objectives and market positioning. - Clearly convey the patent's value in contributing to the organization's competitiveness. - Conduct regular reviews and updates to keep the patent aligned with evolving business and technology landscapes.

Drafting a patent application for investors? Keep it focused on what makes your invention unique and why it's a great market opportunity. Make sure your claims are clear and show off how novel your idea is. Don't forget to throw in some market analysis and potential earnings to catch your investors' eyes. And yeah, getting some legal advice from a patent pro can really help too!

Remember that a patent filing involves considerable cash investment - both for covering the filing expenses as well as the maintenance fees the IP owner needs to pay over the lifetime of the patent. Therefore, inventors need to understand the business and budget priorities as well as the expected return on investment in the patent filing before they start their draft. A couple of key questions to consider are are you trying to create a patent to protect a product or simply aiming to stopping or slowing your competitors from advancing their product offerings? Depending on what you aim to achieve, the way you draft an invention will vary significantly. Also, you may end up choosing different patent filing strategies based on your objectives.

Nailing down the invention description is so essential early on. Being meticulous and precise in explaining the technology, functionality, and unique value proposition establishes a strong foundation for the rest of the application. Avoiding ambiguity or overly broad language prevents issues down the line. I appreciate you emphasizing the importance of boundaries and scope too - clearly carving out the novel aspects sets up your claims for success. And using visuals is brilliant for illustrating the mechanics and relationships in a way that written descriptions alone cannot. Investing time upfront to craft a detailed yet concise invention definition, supported by diagrams, provides critical clarity.

Craft your language carefully, outlining its unique features, functions and components. Explain every technical element in clear, accessible terms. Be specific about how it solves a problem or improves upon existing solutions. Highlight what makes it non-obvious, distinguishing it from similar inventions. A comprehensive description aids patent examiners and potential users in understanding the novelty and distinctiveness of your creation. Through meticulous detailing, a well-defined patent application not only safeguards your intellectual property but also serves as a foundational document for future development and commercialization of your invention.

I have been providing technical patent training for engineers over the last 6 years and have reviewed over 1600 invention documents to date as an internal reviewer. The most common pitfall I observe is the failure to clearly communicate a technical concept to establish plausibility fit for the real world. Some inventors fail to make use of well-annotated diagrams to clearly explain what their idea is while others fail to differentiate between the "what" piece of the idea with the "how" piece. Accurate use of the language in writing is yet another issue I see regarding clarity in inventions. I think there is a misconception that if an idea is good and original, failure to describe it clearly will not impede its potential for patentability.

If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.- Albert Einstein- -Not everyone is enlightened or technical, so the concept should be reduced to the simplest possible form so that everyone can understand the depth of the idea. I tried to synthesize the idea in a few words or phrases. -Specify the technological terms (but use them) so that they feel included in the conversation. Make drawings or mind maps that help to focus and delimit the idea. -Give examples of how they can be innovative, forecasting trends as a basis for argumentation (be realistic, talk with numbers). -Explain about the limitations, the risks to consider, and examples in which cases it should not be done.

Die Ansprüche beschreiben das Schutzbegehren bzw. den Schutzgegenstand. Sie werden durch die Beschreibung und die Zeichnungen ausgelegt. Bei der Formulierung ist auf konsistente Verwendung von Begriffen zu achten, die in der Beschreibung zu definieren sind, wenn sie auslegungsbedürftig sind. Vor dem Europäischen Patentamt (EPA) spielt Klarheit eine wichtige Rolle, um den Schutzumfang bemessen zu können. Hierbei kommt dem Verständnis des Fachmanns eine zentrale Rolle zu. In Verfahren vor den deutschen Patentbehörden spielt die Klarheit eine untergeordnete bis keine Rolle. Es ist zu überlegen für welche Jurisdiktionen man die Patentanmeldung schreibt. Der Fachmann muss die Erfindung anhand der Offenbarung nacharbeiten können.

Die Ansprüche definieren das Schutzbegehren bzw. den Schutzgegenstand. Sie werden durch die Beschreibung und die Zeichnungen ausgelegt. Bei der Formulierung ist auf konsistente Verwendung von Begriffen zu achten, die in der Beschreibung zu definieren sind, wenn sie auslegungsbedürftig sind. Die Erfindung muss dabei derart in der Gesamtoffenbarung (Ansprüche, Beschreibung und Zeichnungen) beschrieben sein, dass ein Fachmann diese nacharbeiten kann. Die Beschreibung sollte sich an den Ansprüchen orientieren und von einem hohen Abstraktionslevel zum Speziellen gehen, wobei auf Spezifika der Jurisdiktion zu achten ist, auf der das Hauptaugenmerk liegt, sowie auf die für den Fachmann gebräuchliche Sprache und Begrifflichkeit.

Sometimes, the research data won’t support exactly what you’re looking for product benefits/claims. What do you do? In my experience, you can go around it. Continue the research; you may be surprised to find out that the claims can be modified with the addition of more benefits for consumer likeness. The most important thing is to be flexible, open minded, not giving up.

Clearly highlight the need that the patent will fulfil and its unique value proposition in terms of technology, research and benefit. Support the use of the with potential quantified projections of the benefits it could bring. E.g would it help reduce wastage by x% etc.

Muito se falou sobre investimento e adequação ao negócio , mas o que realmente importa é o quão a inovação / produto/serviço atendem as necessidades dos consumidores , os verdadeiros chefes , o quanto ela realmente vai melhorar a vida das pessoas , se for relevante com certeza será escalável e terá muito sucesso.

Spot on advice! Thoughtfully crafted claims that align with your invention description and highlight value are vital. As you said, claims define the legal scope of protection - making them clear and air-tight is critical. I appreciate your point about framing claims with investors in mind. Emphasizing the novelty, utility, and differentiation in language that resonates with their priorities is brilliant. It showcases how your invention delivers on their needs. Keeping claims focused on the essential technical features, while also conveying the meaningful business impact you enable, creates a very compelling case. This level of intentionality in claim writing will really maximize the strength and impact of your application.

In den meisten Fällen wird Schutz in mehr als einer Jurisdiktion begehrt. Daher ist es ratsam sich entweder mit den formalen Erfordernissen, die an Patentanmeldungen der Jurisdiktionen gestellt werden, vertraut zu machen, in denen Schutz begehrt wird. Hier spielt auch das Prioritätsrecht eine zentrale Rolle. Alternativ kann eine internationale Patentanmeldung, eine sog. PCT-Anmeldung, den Formalaufwand deutlich reduzieren, da diese als Anmeldung in einer Vielzahl von Jurisdiktionen gilt. Nach einer Übergangsfrist von etwa 30 Monaten kann dann eine Nationalisierung oder Regionalisierung in relevanten Jurisdiktionen vorangetrieben werden. Dadurch gewinnt man auch Zeit, um die Zieljurisdiktionen auszuwählen.

First of all, the investor should know exactly what they need and share details to patent attorney to save time for all running around.

Excellent point on carefully following the proper format and guidelines for your target jurisdiction. Navigating the specific structural, formatting, and content requirements is so important to avoid issues or delays. Whether drafting the application yourself or working with an attorney, proactively learning the standards shows professionalism. For complex applications, tapping into an expert like yourself to ensure compliance and optimize drafting is invaluable. Your experience with different regions' formats will provide that critical oversight. Thoroughly understanding expectations and crafting an air-tight submission demonstrates meticulousness and command. Heeding guidelines enhances quality and gets applications off to the right start

1. Follow Jurisdiction Guidelines: Adhere to specific format and guidelines set by your patent application's jurisdiction, considering factors like document length and structure. 2. Research Standards: Familiarize yourself with patent format and guidelines for compliance, understanding expectations regarding language and content. 3. Professional Assistance: Consult a patent attorney or agent for expert guidance, ensuring alignment with regulatory standards. 4. Continuous Compliance Check: Stay updated on jurisdictional patent regulations, maintaining ongoing compliance throughout the application process.

Il faut être sur de la solidité d'un brevet: => l'activité, inventive: si la réalisation est le résultat de l'application l'état de l'art connu, le brevet est faible. => la nouveauté : La recherche d'antériorités se fait dans les brevets déjà enregistrés. Des antériorités jamais été brevetées peuvent annuler votre brevet. Il faut scruter ailleurs. Curiosité = créativité = efficacité => le caractère industrialisable. Breveter une idée pas testée est dangereux. Il faut savoir être critique sur les points qui assurent la solidité devant un juge de votre brevet. Celui qui sait vous déconseiller de breveter est précieux. Un brevet c'est bien, un brevet solide c'est mieux.

For drafting a full application, it’s good to involve legal expertise. Consult with a patent attorney for a comprehensive and legally clean application tailored to your organization's innovation.

Normalmente los grupos de investigación suelen tener una oficina de transferencia tecnológica con un experto en redacción de patentes o te ponen en contacto con un agente de patentes que redactará tu patente de acuerdo a la información técnica que envía el investigador. Es muy importante releer, repasar, hacer los meetings necesarios entre el inventor i el redactor para aclarar cualquier discrepancia que pueda haber en el texto. El redactor no tiene porque tener los conocimientos técnicos necesarios ni implicaciones que tiene la patente. Al final, el interesado es el máximo "culpable" del contenido de su propia patente. Por este motivo, se aconseja al inventor leer muchas patentes para proteger mejor su invención y entender su contenido.

1. Thorough Review: - Before submission, meticulously review and revise your patent application for errors, inconsistencies, or gaps in descriptions, claims, and drawings. 2. Address Potential Issues: - Check for patentability concerns, including prior art, obviousness, or lack of novelty, and address them diligently. 3. Seek Feedback: - Request feedback from colleagues, mentors, or patent experts for additional insights. - Incorporate suggestions and recommendations to enhance the overall quality of your patent application.

Oui multiplier les avis, au delà de celui de votre conseil, adopter une attitude critique et challenger la solidité de son brevet est une bonne chose. Voir contribution precédente.

Before, during and after the provisional application, the scientist should keep in mind the cost, budget of the patent, adding the application costs for all the countries the patent will be extended. These countries are normally the ones where the company/ investors have higher sales. No surprises should occur when communicating back to the marketer the overall cost of the research and patent application fees. Bottom line, the revenue generated by the marketed product should output the competition creating higher market shares.

I agree with the other comments that investor needs and your business plans don’t belong in your patent application and would probably lower your chances of success if you did include them. For the US system anyway the focus is entirely on why the innovation is novel and non-obvious.

Transformar a inovação como ÚNICA , destacando o propósito da empresa em criar coisas únicas , valoriza e transforma o objeto da patente em algo curioso e instigante

Desde mi punto de vista i desde un de perfil técnico en el desarrollo de varios medical devices. No tengo del todo claro que en la propia patente deba existir algún tipo de mención a un plan estratégico de acuerdo con la explotación de esa patente. Las patentes, al ser de dominio público, no tienen porque ser atractivas desde el punto de vista del documento. Deben ser claras pero no dejar ver segundas aplicaciones o puntos confusos donde una segunda parte pudiera desarrollar una tecnología semejante pero suficientemente diferenciada para poder competir con tu producto final. Tendría mucho más sentido que todo lo concerniente inversores, beneficios, comercialización... constara en el business plan, y tratar en privado esos temas.

In my professional experience, when drafting a patent application for startups, it's about striking a fine balance. You've got to tune into what investors are looking for - think market uniqueness and the potential for substantial returns. At the same time, the real value lies in thoroughly covering the innovation behind your technology. It’s about crafting the patent in a way that's broad enough to deter competitors, yet specific enough to be enforceable. And always, keep an eye on the future, anticipating how your tech might evolve. This approach not only appeals to investors but also cements a solid foundation for your intellectual property assets.

One thing I have found helpful for the businesses I work with is to get them to start with the end in mind. What, in the particular case, is the purpose to be served by the patent? With this end purpose clearly defined, a patent application can be crafted to best deliver the desired result, along with an appropriate narrative to explain the approach to investors and business leaders. The biggest mistake I see is patent filings being made just to tick a perceived 'box' on an investor's checklist. Much better to have a sound, overarching IP plan, that then drives to the decision to file a patent application (or not), and that can be shared with investors.

Most of our time goes in detailing the patent, what is to be considered is All possible variations that are possible to be created and filed as a new Innovation. If a good patent writer is hired, he/she will know the right way to do so

Writing a complete patent document is a complex task that I think needs to be broken down into smaller pieces. I recommend starting with a very brief document designed for a 3-minute elevator pitch that describes the core patenting pillars: 1 - Novelty 2 - Usefulness 3 - Non-obviousness. I would then expand on that basic document to cover additional requirements prompted by your business needs. Based on my experience as a patent mentor, inventor and as a reviewer, I think many inventors attempt to jump directly into the details of their idea prematurely and lose sight of the high level concepts that matter the most. This leads to self-confusion and a poorly created invention draft unfortunately.

La démarche brevet a toujours été utilisée pour protéger sa part de marché. Le monopole accordé par le brevet autorise une exploitation au mépris de la cause humaine, sociale, sociétale ou environnementale. De nombreux exemples acréditent cette dérive. Une utilisation inverse est possible: une utilisation de la protection industrielle pour empêcher une concurrence économiquement, socialement et environnentalement désastreuse et déloyale. Seule une puissance financière alliée à une approche éthique peuvent éviter ce genre de dérive. Un droit de prémption correctement rémunéré de même nature que celui qui est accordé pour la défense nationale devrai se mettre en place à l'international à l'attention des causes humaines et environnementales.

To draft a patent application that aligns with your organization's investor needs, leveraging AI technology can be highly beneficial. Tools like Edge and Solve Intelligence utilize advancements in artificial intelligence and cloud software to streamline and enhance the patent process. Both of them are YC alumni. Incorporating AI into the patent drafting process can significantly aid in creating applications that meet investor requirements. AI tools can help ensure that the applications are comprehensive, well-structured, and aligned with both legal standards and investor interests. By automating and optimizing various aspects of the drafting process, these technologies can also save time and reduce potential errors.