How can you make your control system fault-tolerant?

Several synergistic methods: Conduct failure modes analysis and design systems that avoid and or capture those failure modes. Provide system redundancy, triple systems with different design paradigm. Provide robust monitoring for each control system oriented around the design of each system. Provide a system to resolve any errors between the systems. Provide a graceful degradation for catastrophic control system failure.

Incluir as falhas propositais, como obsolescência programada, sabotagem, as decorrentes de cortes de custos, e as decorrentes de inexperiência

In the context of systems engineering, a fault refers to any deviation from the normal or expected behavior of a system component, such as a sensor, actuator, communication link, or controller. These deviations can be caused by various factors, including wear and tear, environmental conditions, human errors, or malicious attacks. Faults can be classified into different types, such as permanent, intermittent, or transient; hard or soft; additive or multiplicative; and random or systematic. Understanding the nature of faults is crucial for designing fault-tolerant control systems that can continue to operate effectively despite these deviations from expected behavior.

A fault is any behavioural change of a system compared to a wanted state and functionality. Root causes can be divided by their origin as per Ishikawa diagram. Causes can be differentiated by duration time on permanent, temporary or accidental.

Control system can be made fault tolerant by significant threshold value to optimum level. After identifying a fault, it can be isolated, estimated & compensated using a proportional integral observer, and the system can be recovered. Non-linear adaptive observer value can be increased to tolerant the fault in control system. Improving threshold value based on machine learning or adaptation algorithm is highly anticipated for fault tolerant in system design.

Fault tolerance in control systems involves redundancy, predictive maintenance, resilient communication, dynamic reconfiguration, fault detection, decentralized control, cybersecurity, adaptive control, hardware and software redundancy, and fail-safe mechanisms. These strategies ensure system reliability, resilience, and uninterrupted operation, mitigating the impact of faults and failures.

It is a core job of an engineer to build a system which works and which does fulfill a purpose. Every engineer is working under constraints such as time, cost, scope and quality. Each system needs to have an acceptable level of failure tolerance and each system, depending on the context and environment can handle failures in a different way. Tolerance can mean very different things. In any case there needs to be an awareness on fault tolerance on each system level. However this is not a pure top down thing, more a collaborative effort across the disciplines and stakeholders.

Fault tolerance is crucial for ensuring safety, reliability, and efficiency in control systems, particularly in critical applications. There is a notable emphasis on the need to prevent potential negative consequences arising from system failures. Additionally, it underscores how fault tolerance can mitigate these impacts, enabling systems to handle faults in a way that prevents or reduces undesirable outcomes, promoting safer and more stable operation.

A Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) will identify in what ways a system can fail and what are the consequences associated with each failures. This should help deciding between accepting or improving the system’s tolerance to a given failure mode.

Fault tolerance is essential for ensuring the safety, reliability, and efficiency of control systems, particularly in critical applications such as aerospace, automotive, robotics, or industrial automation. Faults can compromise the performance and functionality of control systems, leading to undesirable outcomes, such as instability, overshoot, oscillations, or drift. Moreover, faults can pose safety risks, such as collisions, explosions, or injuries. Fault tolerance allows control systems to cope with faults and avoid or reduce these negative impacts. It provides a safety net against potential risks, allowing systems to exhibit a "safe failure" mode, preventing catastrophic failures and maintaining a level of safe functionality.

To design a fault-tolerant control system, consider redundancy in sensors, actuators, and controllers. Implement diverse fault detection methods, like residual analysis or observers. Employ voting algorithms for decision-making and implement a reliable communication network. Ensure graceful degradation during faults, and prioritize fail-safe modes. Conduct thorough system analysis, including Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA), to identify critical components. Use fault-tolerant architectures like Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) or N-version programming. Regularly test and validate fault-tolerance mechanisms to maintain system reliability.

- Identify the fail safe modes and operations for the system, sub systems and functionality. - Design the control system robust enough to prevent the abnormal behavior due to manual operating errors / unexpected inputs. - Identify environmental parameters impacting the system and add measures to monitor such parameters to allow the system opration within the safe range. - Design the fault detection mechanisms robust enough to prevent any impact due to transient behavior. - Place the appropriate recovery mechanisms if possible with out a manual intervention. - Keep the place holder to store enough fault diagnostics information for the analysis and improvements of the design in future.

Also the subsystems used within the sistem must have self test (power-up, continuous and initiated tests by an operator) capabilities and the status of these tests should be monitored either autonomously or by an operator depending on the system. Additionally, by utilizing dissimilar software and hardware components in the system, the possible mishap situations could potentially be detected at an early stage by minimizing the risk of unnoticed common mode failures.

If the system has hazardous or catastrophic failure modes, then a combination of failure mode effects analysis and fault tree analysis may be used to identify the components or subsystems that must be redundant and cannot have common mode failures. This is typically done for aircraft and nuclear power systems.

I've found it helpful to understand the failure modes of each component, and the consequence of that failure. For hidden failures that includes understanding how long until they are discovered, and what else can go wrong in the mean time. Most issues seem to arise when systems fail in unexpected ways, or with unintended consequences.

From the human space flight perspective, typically we require at least single failure tolerance to catastrophic hazards. Doesn’t mean that critical hazards don’t warrant failure tolerance, but of course, sometimes the simple addition of a leg of failure tolerance can actually lead to an increase in risk.

Telecommunications networks rely on fault-tolerant control to ensure connectivity and service quality. Redundant network elements, routing protocols, and automatic failover mechanisms ensure that data transmission continues even when the network fails or becomes congested.

Fault-tolerant control systems are employed in a variety of critical applications, with prominent examples including the fly-by-wire system in aircraft, ABS in cars, and adaptive cruise control (ACC). In addition to these, systems such as power steering, vehicle stability control (VSC), and fuel control in vehicles are commonly encountered. All these systems are meticulously designed to identify, diagnose, and address faults, ensuring safe and efficient operation under diverse conditions.

Fault-tolerant control systems are widely used in various sectors. For instance, in the aviation industry, flight control systems are designed to be fault-tolerant to ensure safety and reliability. Similarly, online transaction processing systems, such as those used for airline reservations, are also designed to be fault-tolerant to ensure continuous availability . In the field of distributed computing, Byzantine fault tolerance (BFT) systems are used to prevent downtime even if certain nodes in a system fail or are driven by malicious actors. These systems are particularly important in industries like aviation, blockchain, nuclear power, and space

A System Can be robust to one single failure but multiple failures or environmental conditions can lead to hazardous effects. This kind of conditions difficult to evaluate shall be taken into account as much as possible within design.

Testing and evaluating fault-tolerant control systems involves simulating various fault scenarios to see how the system responds. This can help identify any weaknesses in the system's fault tolerance and make necessary adjustments . In addition to testing, ongoing monitoring and evaluation are also important. This involves continuously tracking the system's performance and reliability to detect any potential faults before they lead to system failure. In summary, designing, implementing, and maintaining a fault-tolerant control system is a complex but crucial task. It requires careful planning, robust design strategies, and ongoing monitoring and evaluation to ensure that the system can withstand faults and continue to function effectively

Design realistic fault scenarios, simulate controlled faults, and observe system responses. Use fault injection for real-world challenges. Test extensively with diverse fault combinations to assess robustness. Implement metrics for performance measurement during and after faults. Evaluate detection, isolation, and recovery abilities. Analyze sensor outputs, control signals, and overall system behavior using statistical methods for reliability validation. Consider environmental factors, hardware redundancies, and communication protocols for resilience assessment. Continuous monitoring and feedback are crucial for adaptive fault-tolerant systems. Robust systems result from comprehensive testing and analytical tools.

The testing and evaluation of fault-tolerant control systems are fundamental processes crucial for ensuring the reliability and resilience of these systems. One significant approach in this context is the utilization of fault injection techniques. These techniques play a pivotal role in simulating real-world scenarios, providing a comprehensive examination of the system's response to various fault types. In conjunction with fault injection, other prevalent methodologies include robustness testing, extensive computational simulations, analysis of historical fault data when available, and controlled field testing. It is essential to acknowledge that each method possesses distinct advantages and limitations.

Software-based method depends heavily on how good our mathematical model is; representation of real-world scenario in our model is very important. Very often, we miss out hazardous scenarios in our software simulation. This is why I often encourage testing with hardware-based methods, for more representative testing. Of course, I also encourage taking strict safety precautions.

Before planning fault tolerance, see if hazards can be eliminated from the design. For example, fault tolerance to prevent battery explosion is unnecessary when an unneeded battery has been removed.

FTA and FMEA are a good start. Relex is just one software platform that can help. I've built top down and bottom up fault trees on homegrown spreadsheets. The FAA requires dual redundancy for aerospace applications. Space systems require triple redundancy. It may not sound innovative, but classic solutions are around for a reason; they are reliable. Microsoft doesn't make avionics software because, you can't shut everything off and turn it back on at 40,000 feet, with 400+ souls at stake.

Fault tolerance is one of many means to reduce risk in a system. It can be effective, but is not always the best solution for risk reduction. Ideally we would design out the faults or use redundancy to improve reliability. They all go back to knowing the risks and their impact to choose the right solution.

The recent failure of the 737 Max, I am certain, was initially justified as an acceptable risk. Most SoF risks are presented as quantitative. e.g. 1 in 10,000 Rather than quantifying the risk; SOF should always be considered as probable, rather than possible.

Besides fault detection, fault diagnosis, and fault accommodation-redundancy, time-based condition monitoring is also important for systems with critical components. Based on FMECA, one knows the timings of the failure mode of some critical components. When these are known, one can introduce time-based CdM to prevent failures of the said critical components.