What are the most important considerations for building web applications with code review standards?

This should be 100% done by linting tools. Having software engineers commenting and dealing with formatting issues is simply an annoying overhead. Others may have a different opinion on this, but this is not at all a priority in my code review. Code need not be in the same style and formatting to be good and legible. To me, the only reason this is important is so that everyone can use the same linting rules and pull requests can become clean and easy to read, and not littered by diffs that are simply formatting changes.

Building web applications according to code review standards is critical for guaranteeing code quality, maintainability, and security. Here are some critical factors for developing successful code review standards - Code structure and modularity, documentation, code performance, security, testing, code review tools, education, and training, etc., By adding these factors to your code review criteria, you can create a strong and collaborative development process for creating high-quality web apps.

According to my experience, we need to consider the following factors when developing good and scalable web apps. 1. First of all need to set effective development process. 2. Define coding standards and methods so can improve the scalability,security and reusability of code. 3. Define standard process of code review so can assure that we are maininting good quality of code. 4. Optimization factors need to be considered like caching, lazy loading, and optimizing assets (images, scripts, stylesheets) delivery. 5. Encourage developers to document code, including comments, README files to facilitate future maintenance and onboarding of new team members. 6. Robust testing must be done to catch bugs early and ensures code reliability.

Minimum we should follow up in any of application. - Coding standards, readability and maintenance - Solid principles and design patterns according to their needs in the application - code coverage, code analysis and vulnerability with security (Sonar, checkmarx and white source tools) - application healthy check, logging and exception handling - local development setup is easier to debug and run depends (docker containers)

A consistência do código é fundamental para a manutenção e compreensão do código por diferentes desenvolvedores. Ferramentas como Prettier, ESLint e StyleCop, ou guias de estilo como os do Google, são excelentes recursos para garantir a consistência do código. Essas ferramentas podem ser configuradas para seguir um conjunto específico de regras de formatação e estilo, tornando o código mais limpo e fácil de ler. Além disso, elas podem ser integradas ao processo de desenvolvimento, como parte do sistema de controle de versão ou do pipeline de integração contínua, para garantir que todo o código esteja em conformidade com as diretrizes estabelecidas.

I have been at fault of not doing this but a good code review should try to pinpoint any performance and quality flaws in the code as well as correctness of the behavior. This can often mean simply running the code being reviewed.

Prioritize clarity and readability in the codebase. Clear, understandable code is easier to maintain, debug, and optimize for performance. Additionally, ensuring that the code follows best practices, is well-organized, and is properly documented contributes significantly to overall code quality and performance.

Code should be efficient and maintainable. This involves writing clean, concise code and avoiding unnecessary complexity. Performance considerations such as load times and memory usage are also important.

La calidad y el rendimiento del código son consideraciones críticas que deben abordarse de manera exhaustiva Evaluación de la lógica y funcionalidad: Es fundamental revisar la lógica del código para garantizar que cumpla con los requisitos funcionales del proyecto. Esto implica verificar que todas las funciones y procesos se implementen correctamente según lo especificado en los requisitos del cliente. Eficiencia y escalabilidad: El código debe ser eficiente y escalable. Se deben identificar y corregir cuellos de botella, operaciones redundantes o estructuras ineficientes. Diseño y estructura del código: Promover la modularidad, la reutilización y la mantenibilidad.

As a learner you might not take performance as your priority but when you work in a real world application, no one wants to use a software with a bad performance. So you need to work on that right now.

I feel this should actually be far higher up. It is a constant battle to build software products for customers and to also make them safe to use. Code reviews can be a great way to help make sure we as engineers produce safe products. Not the only of course but still a valuable one all the same.

Code should follow best practices for security to protect against threats like SQL injection and cross-site scripting. Compliance with relevant laws and regulations, such as GDPR for data privacy, is also crucial.

Good documentation makes it easier for others to understand and contribute to the code. Clear communication about changes and issues is also important in a collaborative environment.

Clear documentation helps another developers understand the purpose and functionality of the code, while effective communication ensures everyone involved in the project is on the same page regarding requirements, progress, and potential issues. Consistent documentation and communication practices facilitate collaboration, maintenance, and future development efforts.

Documenting code is vital since different developers may have various approaches to the same problem. Some prefer shorthands methods and this can pose confusion amongst others. A well documented code enhances collaboration since it is easy to follow through.

The code should ideally be self-documenting to enhance its readability; if this is not the case, we may need to review and improve how the code is written. However, there are exceptions, such as when developing libraries or implementing features governed by complex business rules. In these scenarios, it becomes necessary to complement the code with external documentation or comments to ensure its use and intentions are comprehensible.

As per my past experience, below points I keep in mind when following the code review process. 1. Security Priority: Emphasize secure coding in reviews to foster a culture of heightened security awareness. 2. Consistent Coding Style: Advocate for uniform coding styles in reviews, enhancing readability and maintenance collaboration. 3. Testing Rigor: Prioritize thorough testing during reviews to instill a culture of responsibility and commitment to code quality. 4. Scalability Awareness: Discuss scalability considerations in reviews, promoting a culture of foresighted development. 5. Documentation Emphasis: Highlight meticulous documentation in reviews to foster a culture of knowledge dissemination and effective collaboration.

Code review is a fundamental piece of software engineering, but we need to keep in mind that code review is not certain that we will not have problems in general in our code, It really can help us to detect simple bugs, simple performance issues, security vulnerabilities, and enforce code conventions but when the software is deployed to production we need to have a healthy infrastructure the support failures, example: redundancy, canaries, monitoring, alarms, and things like that.

A well-defined code review process helps catch issues early and improves code quality. A positive culture around code review, where feedback is constructive and respectfully given and received, makes this process more effective.

Code reviews are tricky but having a great process helps. The purpose should be clear, that's to improve the code quality and highlight any immediate issues that are observed. Both reviewers and the author need to be considerate but not hesitant of each other.