Senior team members clash on economic policy strategies. How can you navigate the debate effectively?

To effectively navigate the clash on economic policy strategies, start by facilitating an open discussion where each senior team member can present their perspective backed by data and evidence. Focus on identifying shared goals for the policy and explore approaches that achieve those goals, leveraging the expertise of each member. By objectively evaluating the potential impact of each strategy, the team can find common ground and reach a well-informed decision.

The costs and benefits -explicit and implicit- of all the strategies that are available must be identified. Likewise, economic indicators that involve both aspects must be used. Board of directors should also consider which of the economic strategies is aligned with the company's long-term strategy. Considering all these factors, the optimal economic strategy must be chosen.

Recognizing and understanding the positions of the senior team members involved in the debate , is the first step to deal with the clash on economic policy strategies. Senior's opinions shaped according to their experiences, expertise, and underlying values. Debate about economic policy strategies, should not be considered good or bad, rather it might be viewed as a necessity to help reach a consensus. Try to start discussions by understanding the senior team members' perspectives, and facilitate a more productive dialogue, to find common grounded. Crafting a policy that aligns with the organisation 's goals.

La escucha activa es un elemento esencial en las discusiones de estrategia. Se trata no sólo de entender lo que se está diciendo sino también de "escuchar" lo que no se dice. Por eso la escucha activa no sólo requiere de la audición sino también de la visión para poder valorar cómo se están diciendo las cosas. Al hablar, hay que tener cuidado de: 1) afirmar lo menos posible y 2) preguntar lo más posible. Las preguntas acertadas son la clave para que el diálogo florezca.

Create a structured environment where each member can present their views and evidence. Encourage active listening and respectful discussion. Use probing questions to explore underlying assumptions and common ground. By guiding the conversation and ensuring everyone has a chance to contribute, you can help the team reach a well-considered consensus.

Evaluating the potential impact of different economic strategies is crucial. Assessing short and long term impact. Analyzing distributional impacts, and evaluating efficiency. This will help the team to move beyond subjective opinions, and ground the debate in more objective terms. This evaluation help choose wisely from alternatives, and implement efficient resources.

Cuando los seniors debaten hay que escuchar 👂. Sin embargo, los debates acalorados suelen estar sustentados en modelos económicos (los cuales a su vez se sustentan en posiciones ideológicas). Así, es necesario identificar cuando estás en una situación como esta y aportar a encontrar un punto medio. O bien, el punto del debate que mejor ayude a resolver la problemática con la que estás lidiando (ojo con tus posiciones: no se trata de inclinarte por la que sos más afín, sino a la que sea más realista).

La ejecución de la estrategia es el punto clave y más delicado. Es el lugar donde se decide el éxito de la empresa. A la hora de implantar las decisiones hay que considerar: 1) cómo evitar la ambigüedad en las decisiones, 2) identificación clara del responsable de cada decisión, 3) cómo dar seguimiento a la implantación y 4) cómo evaluar el resultado de la estrategia.