What are the top strategies for giving and receiving feedback in front-end development?

There needs to be a clear set of goals and acceptance criteria, that way you know what to check against. The clearer these are, the easier it will be to give feedback. Feedback can come from different people at different times. It could be for a POC, from other IT team members, from other stakeholders, or from a focus group. Depending on the stage of development, you'll want to have the right people look at the right things. Then you need to assess that feedback, noting recurring themes and comments. This can be presented in various ways: post-launch fixes, Marketing revisions, customer feedback, etc. Feedback should serve a purpose other than "good vs bad". Lessons learned, issues to fix, and any feedback needs to have value.

Feedback should be directed towards aligning with the overarching goals of the project. For example, if the goal of a web application is to improve user engagement, feedback should focus on aspects such as usability, interface design, and feature prioritisation to meet this objective.

Setting up clear objectives is the first step to achieving the goals. The objectives should be split into smaller clearly understandable user stories. The user stories can then be broken down into tasks. These tasks should contain a clear acceptance criteria and user experience objectives, User interface designs and everything that frontend engineers would need to implement the actual features.

Giving and receiving feedback in front-end development requires specificity and objectivity. When giving feedback, be constructive, balance positive and negative points, and use examples. Encourage dialogue and respect the recipient. Receiving feedback involves staying open-minded, actively listening, and asking clarifying questions. Reflect on feedback, identify patterns, and express gratitude for insights shared. These strategies foster growth, collaboration, and a positive development environment.

These are fundamental for assessing the quality, functionality, and adherence to coding standards of the codebase. Code reviews involve team members inspecting each other's code for errors, inefficiencies, or potential improvements. Pull requests facilitate this process by allowing developers to propose changes and receive feedback before merging them into the main codebase. Issue tracking systems such as Jira, Trello, or GitHub Issues help manage and prioritise tasks, bugs, and feature requests. Team members can provide feedback on specific issues, track their progress, and collaborate on resolving them.

من اهم وانجح الطرق: تشجيع المطورين على طرح الأسئلة وطلب التوضيح يشعر المطورون بالراحة عندما يكون لديهم بيئة عمل تشجع على طرح الأسئلة دون خوف من الانتقاد ثم أظهر التقدير للمطورين الذين يطرحون الأسئلة

It’s very impressive to use the right tools which help the people to give and receive feedback. PR templates serve a great purpose here. A standard PR template allows and binds people to give enough information about the underlying implementation and changes done in the code. This helps the reviewer to understand what the developer is trying to do. So they can effectively suggest the changes that can be done in order to make it more effective. Sometimes the PRs are too big and the reviewers feel overwhelmed, so they don’t give the right feedback being busy with other things. So PRs should be clear and small. Further in each PR you can add multiple commits which should do one single task and should describe themselves clearly.

To make your web app smarter, integrate AI and ML for personalization, predictive analytics, NLP, image recognition, smart automation, and dynamic content without these app will always outdated.

The business analysts and devs should discuss thoroughly and do grooming keeping in loop the manager,QA about the requirement and document everything in the jira ticket, story, task. They should add proper mock ups and acceptance criteria for the story. Even very basic details like how a button should behave, what should be the color scheme etc. should be mentioned in the story so that there would be no confusion in the future and it will not introduce bugs.

We use Less framework for develop software. We use 2 touch point to get feedback back. One of them in end of sprint in the review meeting another in end of release version. At the end of the sprint we test and get feedback back with fake data just for delivery business functionality and at the end of the release in the preview meeting we get feedback with real data to get approved to publish version

When giving feedback it's best to be specific and focus on the code's functionality and design not the person. When receiving feedback keeping an open mind towards viewing feedback as an opportunity to learn and improve. Taking a collaborative approach towards the goal achieves the best experience for everyone.

Make it very easy for the users to provide feedback. Gather the feedback on the five point scale. Ask freeform text suggestion also. Make use of user suggestions and feed that into the product idea

Use the "Feedback Sandwich" Approach: Start with positive feedback or areas of strength, then address areas for improvement, and end with positive reinforcement or encouragement. This helps balance criticism with recognition of effort.

Encouraging peers to review your strategies and designs can unveil new perspectives and insights, highlighting areas for improvement that may not have been evident initially. This collaborative approach fosters a culture of continuous learning and adaptability, essential for innovation and quality enhancement. Being open to different viewpoints not only refines your work but also promotes a team environment where constructive criticism is valued as a tool for growth.

Providing and receiving feedback in frontend development is crucial for collaboration and improvement. When giving feedback, be specific and constructive, avoiding vague comments. Use visual aids & code snippets to illustrate points, and highlight positives along with areas for improvement. Encourage dialogue and suggest alternative solutions. When receiving feedback, maintain an open mindset, considering it as an opportunity for growth. Ask clarifying questions and view feedback as a means to refine projects. Regular feedback sessions foster a culture of continuous improvement, enhancing efficiency & collaboration. Emphasizing constructive communication ensures that feedback becomes a valuable tool for excellence in front-end development.

Collecting insights is beneficial, but without action, feedback remains just a collection of suggestions. Prioritize feedback by cross-referencing it with user needs and project goals to identify which points warrant immediate action. Implementing changes based on this prioritization not only enhances your application but also shows stakeholders and users that their input has a tangible impact. Swiftly acting on relevant feedback drives continuous improvement, ensuring your project evolves in alignment with user expectations and industry standards. Remember, feedback is a catalyst for growth, and acting on it is what transforms good front-end development into great.

Once you have received enough feedback about your work, it’s time to review the feedback and see how it can help you improve the code. You need to analyze each point and see if it will add any value. You can question the feedback as well if you are not clear about anything. Github provides a very useful interface for reviewing the PRs, where reviewers add their comments and feedback other people can participate in the conversation. Once concluded owner can act upon agreed changes.

One strategy that consistently proves effective is highlighting the positive aspects of the code during a review. Acknowledging the strengths of the work and mentioning the insights gained from the review not only demonstrates your appreciation for your coworker's hard work but also fosters a positive and collaborative atmosphere.

* Clear goals & expectations: Ensure everyone is on the same page about the project's objectives and desired feedback. * Right tools & methods: Utilize code reviews, pull requests, or user testing for effective feedback exchange. * Specific & constructive: Provide clear and actionable suggestions when giving feedback. * Seek & accept feedback: Be open to receiving feedback and actively seek it from others. * Act on feedback: Consider the feedback and make necessary improvements to your work.

Mastering the art of feedback involves distinguishing between ego-driven and egoless perspectives. Recognize that you are not your code; feedback targets improvement, not criticism of personal ability. It's essential to approach feedback with an open mind, understanding that suggestions are aimed at refining the project towards a shared vision or goal, not diminishing your contributions. This mindset facilitates a constructive environment where feedback is seen as a valuable tool for growth, steering the project in a direction beneficial for all stakeholders. Embrace feedback with humility and professionalism, ensuring it fosters development and collaboration rather than conflict.