We've all known it. Now the insiders are saying it, generative AI is being built on the backs of massive copyright theft, or, as NewsCorp said in its recent lawsuit filed against Perplexity, a "content kleptocracy." Content owners and creators deserve to receive credit, traffic, and a direct revenue share when their intellectual property contributes to a generative response. ProRata.ai is leading the movement to ensure they receive it--come join us! Cade Metz talks to a former OpenAI researcher about how the company broke copyright law. #generativeai
ProRata.ai
Technology, Information and Internet
Pasadena, California 1,333 followers
ProRata.ai – Fair compensation and credit for content owners in the age of AI.
About us
ProRata.ai enables the alignment of usage and revenues between AI platforms and content owners.
- Website
-
https://prorata.ai/
External link for ProRata.ai
- Industry
- Technology, Information and Internet
- Company size
- 11-50 employees
- Headquarters
- Pasadena, California
- Type
- Privately Held
- Founded
- 2024
Locations
-
Primary
130 W Union St
Pasadena, California 91103, US
Employees at ProRata.ai
Updates
-
We're incredibly excited to be partnering with Universal Music Group and helping Sir Lucian Grainge go on the offensive in the battle over unauthorized use of content by generative AI . #generativeAI #AIRevenueSharing #ContentsCreators
Lucian Grainge is going on the offensive as an AI wave washes over the music industry
businessinsider.com
-
Shelly Palmer nicely sums up the whole problem with AIs shoplifting content. “Publishers can’t earn a living if you don’t see ads or click on them. AI bots and their respective generative AI platforms don’t see or click; they simply summarize and surface aggregated content without attribution or remuneration.” #AIEthics #ContentCreation #FairCompensation #FutureOfMedia #TechInnovation
Professor of Advanced Media in Residence at S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University
The New York Times has put Perplexity.ai on notice: “Don’t crawl our site, or else!” This is a little comical since Google has been crawling nytimes.com since the beginning of Google, but we need a distinction here. Two verbs, both terms of art: “to crawl,” which means to systematically browse the web, index content, and then make it searchable through a search engine; “to scrape,” which is the automated process of gathering information from the web to collect content from webpages. Is Perplexity crawling to index and surface data, or is it scraping to index, surface, and train on data? Hmmm… The dispute between The New York Times and Perplexity underscores growing tensions between traditional media outlets and AI companies over content usage rights. The New York Times issued a cease and desist letter to Perplexity, accusing the AI search engine startup of using its content without permission. This move comes amid similar claims from other publishers, including Forbes and Condé Nast, and an ongoing lawsuit by NYT against OpenAI and Microsoft over content training without proper authorization. The New York Times contends that “Perplexity and its partners have been unjustly enriched by using its journalism without a license. The company has already prohibited AI crawlers, including Perplexity’s, through its robots.txt file.” Perplexity, however, denies scraping content for AI training, emphasizing that it merely indexes web pages to present factual content in its answers. In what may be the most misguided statement that I’ve ever heard regarding copyrighted content, Perplexity spokesperson Sara Platnick argued that “no entity owns the copyright over facts,” defending its approach to indexing content and citing it to inform responses. The company expressed a desire for collaboration with publishers, rather than conflict. (In response to plagiarism accusations earlier in the year, Perplexity struck agreements with several publishers, including Fortune, Time, and The Texas Tribune, to offer ad revenue and free subscriptions.) If you need a name for this battle, call it “the battle over link-based search.” Publishers can’t earn a living if you don’t see ads or click on them. AI bots and their respective generative AI platforms don’t see or click; they simply summarize and surface aggregated content without attribution or remuneration. Oops. This is “the” fight of the year – maybe the next five years. -s
-
ProRata.ai reposted this
Contact Me: Tech Deal Lawyer for SaaS/Cloud & Media/Advertising. | 20+ yrs experience in: Law, BizDev, CorpDev, In-house, BigLaw & PE. | JD/MBA -- JD from Boston U cum laude; MBA from U Michigan
Do content creators deserve to be paid when their content is used as part of an answer generated by AI? If so, how do you determine how much to pay them? ProRata.ai may have the answer. [Full disclosure, they're my client, so I may be biased, but I think what they're doing is groundbreaking.] "AI titans like Google and OpenAI and upstarts like Perplexity are all working on...answer engines.... As those efforts evolve, publishers and copyright holders from news sites to music companies are demanding a share of the money AI search generates based on their content. "following accusations of plagiarism from Fortune, Time, and others, Perplexity announced that it planned to share ad revenue with the publishers of articles cited by the company’s answer engine once it begins adding ads to its platform (it’s targeting a Q4 launch).... "...Google, meanwhile...said that it won’t share revenue with publishers that contribute to results. "One thing is clear: Determining how much to pay publishers for their contributions to “answers” is a complex calculation. That’s something Bill Gross—a serial entrepreneur who’s credited with developing the pay-per-click advertising tech that still undergirds traditional web search—wants to remedy with AI company ProRata. " "ProRata’s search will only perform retrieval-augmented generation on content that it has licensed. ProRata’s answer engine also uses proprietary attribution algorithms designed to calculate how much any given publisher’s content contributed to an answer. "ProRata has a decidedly smaller knowledge pool to draw on than competing AI search engines that scan the entire Internet for content to inform an answer. “We won’t have the whole web,” Gross says. “But I contend that will be better because we won’t have every piece of random garbage you can crawl—garbage in equals garbage out.” The company says its answer engine will launch with more than 25 million articles, and a spokesperson claims that less than “one-tenth of 1% of questions might not be answered.” https://lnkd.in/eefjnQNr
This new AI answer engine plans to pay media companies for their content
fastcompany.com
-
We strongly disagree with Google's position here: "The company will not share ad revenue with publishers whose material is cited in AI Overviews" from Curtis Heinzl Bloomberg News article - Google Begins Wide Rollout of Ads in AI Overview Search Results. At ProRata, we believe that publishers need a sustainable economic model in the generative AI era—and that model includes revenue sharing. What do you think? #GenerativeAI #ContentsCreators #ContentOwnership #AIRevenueSharing
Google Begins Wide Rollout of Ads in AI Overview Search Results
bloomberg.com
-
The future of search is here, and it's built on fairness. We're revolutionizing AI search by ensuring that content creators are rewarded for their work. David Salazar of Fast Company writes, “This new AI answer engine plans to pay media companies for their content.” At ProRata, we compensates publishers and content owners for their content, ensuring a sustainable ecosystem for everyone. #AISearch #FairCompensation
This new AI answer engine plans to pay media companies for their content
fastcompany.com
-
ProRata.ai reposted this
I believe that Generative AI is amazing, powerful, and unstoppable, but can be even better by being fair to the content creators that power it.. ProRata.ai is creating a platform to compute the partial attribution / contribution of content and share revenue 50/50 on a ProRata basis with publishers, authors, animators, illustrators and more (all creators). FastCompany talks about ProRata's mission here. We'd love feedback on how to make this even better! https://lnkd.in/g_57c8jA
This new AI answer engine plans to pay media companies for their content
fastcompany.com