The Alliance for Longevity Initiatives reposted this
Agingbiotech.info is an outstanding resource for anyone seeking to navigate and understand the rapidly evolving longevity field.
Announcing AgingBiotech.info / companies (https://lnkd.in/gPZp2DNV) version 2.0, a giant overhaul & update: - new columns - 50+ new companies - 200 companies fully up-to-date as of 2024 inc. all of the most noteworthy - a new non-alphabetical default ordering based on rough significance - grayscaling cells w/ older info (& still as-of dates for rows) - mini preview pipeline images for companies that have them (change zoom to 200% to see better, or click each clinical stage column link) - info needing elaboration marked w/ *’s & elaborated in notes col There are still small companies overdue for update & many in the to-be-considered tab to be moved to main list in coming months. Most are small or need decision whether they're aging-focused enough. Despite more to do, this update is a big enough improvement to launch. Scope: In the sequence: academia->biotech->clinic, this site focuses on the middle step. Companies are where academic science translates into something usable for millions of people. Aging science breakthrus will have to go thru companies to help society as a whole. Only companies focused on aging or core-aging areas are in-scope. See “what counts as aging here” in the about page for criteria. This update adds columns to fine-grain aging focus, such "aging mission?" & "core aging area?". You can restrict based on these. This has been a long time coming. Covid 1st halted company updates, then expanding the site to add new tables so that it covers everything important in the field. But sorry for the long companies table delay! To see companies added recently, sort by “date added to list” col. Ranking: As noted in "The Default Sort Order..." in the about page, do not obsess over small position diffs in default sort. It is only meant to be a very crude sort to show rows that should be more prominent very roughly above others. It’s not a leaderboard. The crude score formulas are a simplistic way to objectively (no manual eval) order rows so clearly significant rows go nearer the top. Inevitably, there will be cases where 2 rows appear to be relatively wrong, but it'd be impossible to find a perfect order, so it's not a goal. There's no 1 col that makes more sense to sort by than a combo function & some significance sort is more useful than default alphabetical. The formulas all transparent & inspectable. No hidden ranking. And anyone can resort by any other col or filter rows by any combo of cols. The ranking criteria for companies involves many factors such as $ raised, # employees, clinical trials stage, & aging focus. I'll put a list of specific factors used in a comment on this post. This companies table originally launched 5yrs ago! I hope that with this update it continues to help many people & to move the field forward. In coming months I hope to release analyses of the past 5yrs growth of the field & of the field's near-term prospects based on aggregate clinical trials pipeline.