Viktoria Morgan Law

🗳️ Fact-Checking Proposition 33: Get the Truth Before You Vote! 🗳️ If Prop. 33 passes, cities could enforce strict rent control policies without state intervention, potentially impacting renters and landlords across California. But will this help the housing crisis or make it worse? The experts disagree, and both sides have made some questionable claims. So, before casting your vote, ensure you're armed with the facts. Share this post to help others understand the truth about Prop. 33! The future of California housing could depend on it. #Prop33 #CaliforniaHousingCrisis #RentControl #VoteSmart #FactCheck Source: CalMatters Newsletter

🌞 Good Morning, California! 🌞 Governor Gavin Newsom has declared a major victory over Big Oil! 🚗💥 So, what do you think? Will this bold move bring real relief at the pump, or are we in for more controversy and higher costs? 🤔 Let's hear your thoughts in the comments below! 👇 Share this post to help spread awareness of this crucial victory and its impact on every Californian. #BigOil #Newsom #GasPriceRelief #CaliforniaPolitics #ABX21 #VictoryLap #FuelEconomy #ClimateAction #FightForChange #EnergyReform #RefineryOversight #PoliticalImpact #CaliforniaLeadership #ConsumerRights

In California, a defective tire accident happens when a car crash is caused by a faulty tire. Whether it's due to a design flaw, manufacturing defect, failure to warn, or negligence, victims deserve compensation. Who is Liable? In these accidents, liability might not rest on the drivers but instead on the tire company, manufacturer, retailer, or even a repair shop. Sometimes, the driver with the defective tire can be held responsible if they neglected proper maintenance. Common Causes of Tire Defects: - Tread separation - Tire blowouts - Air pressure issues - Weak rubber - Faulty sidewall construction These problems can make drivers lose control, causing devastating accidents. Your Rights as a Victim If you've been injured due to a defective tire, California’s personal injury laws allow you to file a claim for compensation. Victims can seek recovery for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and more. Don't let negligence go unchecked! If you or a loved one has been involved in an accident caused by a defective tire, you deserve justice. 💼 Consult a Personal Injury Lawyer Today A lawyer can help prove your case and get you the compensation you deserve. Let’s make sure faulty products don’t continue to put lives at risk. Contact Viktoria Morgan Law at (805)-947-5675. 🔗 Know someone affected by a defective tire accident? Share this post and help spread awareness. No one should suffer due to faulty products! #DefectiveTireAccidents #PersonalInjuryLaw #CaliforniaLaw #RoadSafety #TireDefects #CarAccidentLawyers #ProductLiability #LegalAdvice #StaySafe #JusticeForVictims

In "In re N.J.", the Court of Appeal made a significant ruling that reversed the termination of a mother’s parental rights. The decision highlights key issues that resonate with many in juvenile dependency cases, including the failure to follow the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) and the relative placement preference. The case involved the removal of a child from the mother at birth due to severe mental health and substance abuse concerns. Despite a maternal aunt consistently requesting placement, the Social Services Agency failed to prioritize and facilitate placement with the aunt, in direct violation of legal mandates. The agency delayed the evaluation of the aunt's home and did not set up meaningful visitation, ultimately denying the placement based on a stronger bond between the minor and foster caregiver. The Court of Appeal didn't hold back, stating: “This series of events—repeated violations of DCFS’s duty to follow the law and the court’s failure to enforce its own orders—resulted in a complete failure to honor the clear legislative mandate to give early and prompt priority to placement with family members.” Additionally, the court found several other critical issues, including the improper handling of ICWA inquiries and the failure to give proper notice to the mother’s conservator regarding the requirement to file an extraordinary writ. As a result, the court reversed the termination of parental rights, ordered a reassessment of reunification services, and directed proper consideration of the aunt’s placement request. The case was also remanded for a complete ICWA inquiry. Help spread awareness about the importance of upholding family placement rights by sharing this post! 💜 #JuvenileDependency #ICWA #ParentalRights #FamilyLaw #FosterCare #RelativePlacement #DependencyCourt #LegalUpdate #Reunification #CourtOfAppeal #ShareToSupport Source: Source: CA Lawyers Association

In a recent ruling, Okonowsky v. Garland (2024), the Ninth Circuit recognized that offsite social media activity can contribute to a hostile work environment. Lindsay Okonowsky, a former psychologist at a federal prison, discovered her co-worker’s Instagram page containing offensive and discriminatory posts, including derogatory references targeting her. Despite her complaints, the prison initially dismissed the issue, and the harassment continued. The court ruled that even though the posts were made outside the workplace, they could still significantly impact the work environment, reviving Okonowsky’s Title VII claim for sex discrimination. 📢 Harassment can extend beyond the workplace—don’t ignore it. Let’s create awareness and advocate for safer, more respectful work environments. 👉 Share to spread the word! #WorkplaceHarassment #SocialMedia #HostileWorkEnvironment #TitleVII #EmployeeRights #LegalUpdate #HRCompliance #NinthCircuit #Discrimination #WorkplaceSafety #EndHarassment #WorkplaceCulture Source: Proskauer CA Employment Law Update

📢 California’s K-12 Reading and Math Scores Show Progress, But Still Below Pre-Pandemic Levels 📚📊 What else can we do to support our students? Share your thoughts in the comments, and let’s keep the conversation going! 🔁 Share this post to raise awareness and help rally support for California’s students and schools! #EducationMatters #K12 #CaliforniaEducation #StudentSuccess #MathAndReading #LearningRecovery #SupportOurStudents #EdChat #PandemicRecovery #EdEquity #LatinoStudents #BlackStudents #LowIncomeStudents #SmarterBalanced Source: CalMatters Newsletter

🚨 California’s $500 Million Affordable Housing Program Collapses—Leaving Tenants at Risk 🚨 📣 Help raise awareness and push for real solutions by sharing this post to support affordable housing and prevent the displacement of vulnerable tenants. #AffordableHousing #HousingCrisis #SilverLake #CommunityLandTrust #SupportHousingJustice #PreserveAffordableHomes Source: CalMatters Newsletter

Road hazards like potholes and poor signage can lead to serious accidents and injuries. If you've been injured due to unsafe road conditions, you *may* be able to file a lawsuit and recover damages— even if you were partly at fault. 🛣️🚗 Who can you sue? You can take legal action against the government (city, county, state, or federal) if they fail to address unsafe road conditions in a timely manner. Other responsible parties may include construction companies or manufacturers of defective road materials. Common Road Hazards: - Potholes and road cracks - Poor lighting or faded lane markings - Faulty guardrails or signs - Dangerous curves - Inadequate traffic control in construction zones Proving Liability: You'll need evidence like witness reports, accident photos, police reports, and medical records to strengthen your case. Act quickly! Statutes of limitations can be as short as 6 months in some states like California. 🔗 Share this post to spread awareness, and if you've been injured, don't hesitate to consult with an attorney about your options! You deserve compensation for your medical bills, property damage, and more. #RoadSafety #PersonalInjury #Potholes #DangerousRoads #LegalHelp #KnowYourRights #InjuryLaw #Compensation #UnsafeRoadConditions

In 'Bijan Boutiques, LLC v. Rosamari Isong', the California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s ruling, blocking Bijan Boutiques from voiding the property distribution in a marital dissolution judgment. Bijan sought to enforce a $327,000 debt owed by Rosamari Isong’s ex-husband, but the court found that "Family Code section 916" protected Isong’s Chino property from Bijan’s claim. This case sheds light on the intersection of Family Law and the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act (UVTA). The court ruled that since the division of property was judicially determined, not negotiated, the UVTA does not apply. Bijan’s claims of unjust enrichment were also denied under Family Code protections. This ruling reinforces the legal shield around marital property divisions and highlights the protection for spouses against their ex’s creditors. Please share to raise awareness on this important legal development! 🏡⚖️ #FamilyLaw #MaritalProperty #VoidableTransactions #LegalUpdate #CourtOfAppeal #CaliforniaLaw #CreditorProtections #BijanBoutiques #CourtRulings #LegalNews #DivorceLaw #LegalAwareness #ShareTheNews Source: CA Lawyers Association

In a significant legal decision, corporate jet pilots have been ruled exempt from overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). In *Kennedy v. Las Vegas Sands Corp.* (2024), the court affirmed that pilots earning between $125K–$160K annually qualify as highly compensated employees engaged in non-manual work with discretionary authority. Even their waiting time between flights, where they could freely engage in personal activities, does not count as “work” for overtime purposes. 🔗 Know someone who might be affected? Share this post to spread awareness! #LegalUpdate #FLSA #OvertimeExemption #CorporatePilots #AviationLaw #NinthCircuit #EmployeeRights #LaborLaw #EmploymentLaw #HRCompliance #LegalNews #WorkplaceRights #PilotLife Source: Proskauer CA Employment Law Update