НеМо: Ukrainian Heritage Monitoring Lab’s Post

Utilitarian attitude, inflicting moral damage, and continuation of Soviet “traditions”: why invaders destroy Ukrainian cultural heritage. HeMo experts have examined more than 1,000 destroyed or damaged cultural heritage sites. In liberated towns, we often see looted museums, vandalized houses of culture, and damaged churches. “We are convinced every time we go on expeditions that heritage is a direct target. Cultural objects are often targeted even in villages without a military presence. It's just that the village was in the frontline zone, and this object seemed like a convenient target for an artilleryman from the opposite side. There are dozens of such attacks in the Kherson region. And our data, surveys, and testimonies we collected during the expedition show that the military had no motive to attack these objects,” says architect Ivan Shchurko. In houses of culture, the epicenter of a hit is usually the assembly hall. The same applies to schools. Experts suggest the aggressor army may believe Ukrainian soldiers are there. However, eyewitness accounts reject this. Physically, a large unit could not have been deployed there, making the attack disproportionate. “They have a very utilitarian attitude toward heritage,” says expert Roksolana Makar. “That is, they see a church in an occupied village, usually as some kind of high point, a bell tower, which it is possible to climb. For example, they are very much afraid that local or some Ukrainian saboteurs will use this bell tower to climb and track down the Russian military.” Another factor is inflicting moral suffering on civilians. A church central to a community holds deep significance. A priest can often be a moral authority. “We went to the Mykolaiv region, and there were a lot of German colonies there, and Catholic and Protestant communities are very common,” says the expert. “One of the sites we documented was a Catholic church in the village of Kyselivka. It was an important building because people came not only for services but also for assistance. This church was targeted about 5 times. When the Russians were pushed back from the village, they shelled it from the neighboring settlement. The church was in ruins. There were only two walls left. Everything inside was burned.” This attitude echoes the Soviet tradition of disregard for historical heritage. In Lukishivka, Chernihiv region, the invaders used a church as an ammunition depot, which exploded, destroying the building. Smithsonian Cultural Rescue Initiative Cultural Emergency Response

  • No alternative text description for this image
  • No alternative text description for this image
  • No alternative text description for this image
René Caderius van Veen

Gepensioneerd expert management

1mo

😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😆

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics