Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz: "We believe bad government policies are now the #1 threat to Little Tech.
We believe American technology supremacy, and the critical role that Little Tech startups play in ensuring that supremacy, is a first class political issue on par with any other.
The time has come to stand up for Little Tech."
Read "The Little Tech Agenda" in full: https://lnkd.in/eXU_Ghi4
In my opinon, Andreessen Horowitz's "Little Tech Agenda" is a smokescreen.
They claim to oppose government control, but exploit it for their own gain.
Big Tech and VCs like a16z shape regulations to protect their dominance and stifle competition. They benefit from bailouts in crises, while startups struggle.
A16z fuels bubbles that burst, hurting small investors. Their "Little Tech" advocacy is self-serving.
To foster innovation, policymakers must create fair regulations and hold Big Tech accountable. The complex interplay between government and private sector must be addressed.
A16z's agenda preserves their power, not startup interests.
We need an ecosystem where startups thrive and innovation flourishes, not one controlled by Silicon Valley elites.
Love the passion here! Like it or not, the battlefield for technological supremacy has shifted from the garage to the halls of government. For Little Tech to thrive, it has to take regulatory battles seriously.
I agree with the effect and certainly the value of increased engagement by Little Tech, but not necessarily the stated cause that Big Tech is out to get Little Tech. After all, what incentive do established firms have to squelch the start-up ecosystem when acquisitions are the dominant source of fundamental innovation for incumbents? Instead, I see the cause as two-fold:
1) Big Tech has the resources to engage and, quite understandably, uses these resources to create self-beneficial regulatory capture. But this is an offensive move, not a defensive one.
2) It is safer for policymakers to side with the status quo (in this case, proven, established players rather than unproven startups)…the public sector equivalent of nobody ever getting fired for hiring IBM.
It’s a subtle but essential distinction, especially in crafting counter strategies.
Hats off to Andreessen Horowitz for an insightful article and for using their self-interested, Big Firm resources to advocate for Little Tech.
Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz: "We believe bad government policies are now the #1 threat to Little Tech.
We believe American technology supremacy, and the critical role that Little Tech startups play in ensuring that supremacy, is a first class political issue on par with any other.
The time has come to stand up for Little Tech."
Read "The Little Tech Agenda" in full: https://lnkd.in/eXU_Ghi4
🎉 We are honoured to share that we have been featured in 2023’s European Tech Review as a rising star! 💪
Like a worldwide iceberg that would crush multiple Titanics, banks face a variety of crippling problems that they are only seeing the tip of today.
We are providing a safe space for you to develop proofs of concept (POCs) for over 500 (and counting) financial technologies.
With us, banks can make final decisions 3x faster, with 3x higher conversions at a 45% higher success rate, which leads to an overall improvement of 10x better results at an 80% lower cost for complex POCs. 💻
NayaOne is navigating the treacherous waters of financial technology so that banks don’t have to.
Many thanks to the Sifted Intelligence Team.
To read the full report, click below. 👇
🔗 https://lnkd.in/egZ6qisP#Fintech#NayaOne#OpenBanking#Startups
Prepare for a thrilling ride through regulatory turbulence! 🚀
Silicon Valley's heavyweights, including venture capitalists, tech trade groups, and startup founders, are rallying against SB 1047's impact on innovation.
With the tech giants at the forefront, the technical prowess at play is truly remarkable. 💻
Despite the resistance, the outcomes are staggering. The implications of SB 1047 parallel a seismic shift in tech policy.
But that's not all... Did you know that the bill was deliberated over just 6 months? ⏱️
This is a pivotal moment in tech regulation, paving the way for future discussions and decisions.
P.S. Dive deeper into the tech world with our cutting-edge bot templates! Enhance your efficiency and workflow with Giga Bots' seamless automation. Click 🔔 [bot.gigabai.com] 🔔 to revolutionize your processes today.
Source: gigabai.com
Andreessen Horowitz top VC co-founders Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz make the case for "little tech" (i.e. real OG Silicon Valley innovation), how SV and VC has typically been monolithicly super-liberal IMO, and make the case for why they are voting for Trump.
This talk in many ways mirrors the line by Ronald Regan ("I didn't leave the Democratic Party, the Democratic Party left me . . .) or famous cartoon on X by Elon Musk on how far left the left in the USA has gone. It's clear that on a range of issues (crypto, taxation, freedom, capitalism, etc.) it's just a bridge too far for A&H and I applaud their guts to stand up and speak their mind.
IMO I basically trashed my career and MASSIVE earnings potential (I made more money in about 1-2 years in SV than a lot of ppl will in their life, years ago (Of course, what I made is a joke to serious heavy-hitters in SV/NYC, but that's exactly the point on the potential and trajectory I was on IMO) by speaking out against the dangers of the far left and censorship complex/cancel culture that was rapidly becoming "mainstream,", and advocating for freedom, liberty, equality and opportunity for all, along with the values and promise of America in the Constitution, etc.
Thus, I know the guts it takes for Andreessen and Horowitz
to take this stand.
I will say though, money is great and all, but life is WAY more than your career or some money in a bank. We start life with nothing and we leave with nothing.
What makes a man a man, a person a person, a patriot a patriot?
To the extreme, all left-wing regimes end up with only one central tenet, maximum control (and demand adherence to the state dictates). They want to force you to act and think the way they want. That's not diversity, that's not freedom, that's not moral or just, and that's not innovation.
A&H can now see the curtain pulled and what the future holds, if not course-corrected IMO.
Our legacy and our children must take top priority. I want to make sure my daughter and the next generation grow up in an America (and world) at least as good as I did. That's why I spoke out years ago. Right is right and I will always advocate for that, period, whether I have $100M or am homeless.
To that end, I think that for #siliconvalley to remain competitive it must continue to be a place that values and allows constant innovation and the "creative destruction" of capitalism as unencumbered (using smart regulation to correct/perfect the markets (i.e. break up monopolies, deal with externalities, etc.) as possible. Which I think is what A&H are getting at with the support for little tech.
Worth that watch!
Full Stack Business Process Executive | Driving Innovation & Integration | Enhancing Client Experiences with Custom Solutions | Building Trust and Lifelong Relationships
Incredible decision by Sridhar Vembu! Prioritizing long-term vision over immediate gains demonstrates true leadership and commitment to sustainable growth. This choice not only aligns with the core values of Zoho but also sets a remarkable example for other tech leaders.
Excited to see how this decision unfolds and drives innovation within the company.
#Leadership#Innovation#TechIndustry"
Our CEO, Sridhar Vembu, recounts the pivotal moment that solidified our decision to steer clear of external funding.
Watch his full discussion with Aakash Chaudhry on Josh Talks about the allure of unicorn businesses, current tech trends, and more.
👉 https://zurl.co/PP4k
Our CEO, Sridhar Vembu, recounts the pivotal moment that solidified our decision to steer clear of external funding.
Watch his full discussion with Aakash Chaudhry on Josh Talks about the allure of unicorn businesses, current tech trends, and more.
👉 https://zurl.co/PP4k
Thanks Mallory Caminade. Many folks in the industry believe that Zoho management will eventually sell. I do not believe they will ever sell. Before I joined Zoho I had some deep discussions with executives on this topic.
Not only is Zoho privately owned but many family members work for Zoho. As an Indian company we can operate without strict US nepotism rules. If you work for Zoho and you have family members that are skilled good workers they can also work for Zoho just not in the same reporting structure.
So, we have a deep employee and family loyalty at Zoho which is very unique and helps us grow rapidly and maintain position as a strong player in the SaaS world.
Evidence of what I say came right when the pandemic hit and our CEO Sridhar Vembu told all the managers that we will not let go of any employees. We made cuts in other places and did very well. Smart conservative management that is customer and employee focused makes a difference and will continue to set us apart from the greedy SaaS crowd.
Our CEO, Sridhar Vembu, recounts the pivotal moment that solidified our decision to steer clear of external funding.
Watch his full discussion with Aakash Chaudhry on Josh Talks about the allure of unicorn businesses, current tech trends, and more.
👉 https://zurl.co/PP4k
AI and Quantum Engineer with a deep passion to use technology to make the world a better place. Published author, podcaster, blogger, and live streamer.
🔍 Discover the fascinating story behind one of the tech industry's most iconic terms - 'debugging'. In this brief yet engaging post, we delve into the origins of this term, tracing it back to a literal bug found in a Harvard computer in 1947.
This anecdote is not only a fun fact but also a testament to the ever-evolving language of technology and the unexpected ways history shapes our modern lexicon. 🖥️✨ Join us for a quick journey through tech history and see how a small moth influenced a whole field.
#TechHistory#Debugging#Innovation
🚀 Astounding stats, fellow innovators! 📈 The big reveal: Top public tech juggernauts have outshone the elite VCs over a 15yr sprint! Simply snagging shares in the tech's Fab Five could've netted you a 10x return. That's north of a 25% IRR—VCs are quaking! 🤯
🧩 Now, link this to #NoCode - it's our investment in innovation, minus the eye-popping funds. 🛠️ With no-code automation, we harness that top-tier tech momentum, democratizing creation & crushing barriers. 🚧
🌱 As the tech empire balloons from 10 to 25 trillion in the 'venture forecast', let's ride that wave 🏄 with smart, streamlined no-code solutions. Think big, build smart, and let's outpace the old school elite with agility and acuity. 💡
#Automation#NoCodeRevolution#TechInvestment#Innovation#FutureOfWork#TechTrends
New #book
‘Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism’
by #author Yanis Varoufakis
explores how giant tech firms, both in the US and #China are expanding their control over the planet.
His analysis is that, whilst material resources certainly matter, the real battle ground is over digital real estate. How Europe’s power has faded, Elon Musk’s dreams and why the US is really afraid of China.
https://lnkd.in/gkCi2PV7
Co-founder & CEO at Dooiu
1moIn my opinon, Andreessen Horowitz's "Little Tech Agenda" is a smokescreen. They claim to oppose government control, but exploit it for their own gain. Big Tech and VCs like a16z shape regulations to protect their dominance and stifle competition. They benefit from bailouts in crises, while startups struggle. A16z fuels bubbles that burst, hurting small investors. Their "Little Tech" advocacy is self-serving. To foster innovation, policymakers must create fair regulations and hold Big Tech accountable. The complex interplay between government and private sector must be addressed. A16z's agenda preserves their power, not startup interests. We need an ecosystem where startups thrive and innovation flourishes, not one controlled by Silicon Valley elites.