Researcher l Seasoned banking professional l Fintech l Technology Policy l Data Ethics l Inclusion
Interesting read on how to bridge the gap between music artists and fair compensation pathways. The rapid advancements in AI, particularly generative tools, are reshaping creative industries. While these technologies offer incredible potential for innovation, they also raise important questions about fair use, copyright, and the livelihoods of artists. #ArtistsAndAI #CreativeEconomy #TechPolicy
Co-founder of the Center for Innovation at the Scarsdale Public Schools, where I also served as the Director of Instructional Technology and Innovation. View my free white papers at jerrycrisci.com
It’s interesting to see content creators and publishers coming together to create a Bill of Rights about the use of AI for creative work in the music industry. The ability to create music with AI has been moving at a rapid pace, and we are about to reach an inflection point. Will artists in other fields follow suit with declarations of rights? Are book publishers and graphic artists next? I think so. https://lnkd.in/esh8h8bB
𝐇𝐚𝐫𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐲 𝐨𝐫 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝? 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐜 𝐆𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐇𝐢𝐭 𝐀𝐈 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐩𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐚 𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐇𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐍𝐨𝐭𝐞 The music industry's heavyweights Universal, Sony, and Warner Music Group have filed lawsuits against AI startups Suno and Udio, accusing them of copyright infringement for using copyrighted music to train their generative AI models. The lawsuits, led by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), claim that these companies have illegally copied and utilized vast amounts of copyrighted recordings to create sound-alike tracks and vocals that mimic famous artists such as Michael Jackson and Bruce Springsteen. Suno and Udio, which allow users to generate music through text prompts, are alleged to have produced outputs that closely resemble original works, threatening the music industry's economic and creative integrity. The labels seek court injunctions to stop the use of their material and demand damages up to $150,000 per infringed work. Suno's CEO defends their technology as transformative and not reliant on memorizing existing content, while the RIAA emphasizes the need for responsible AI development that respects artists' rights.
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in the music industry has brought about a complex and contentious landscape where innovation intersects with intellectual property rights. Recently, two leading text-to-music AI tools, Suno and Udio, have found themselves at the center of this debate, facing lawsuits for copyright infringement filed by the three major record labels, and led by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). The record labels allege that Suno and Udio used their recordings without a license to train Suno’s and Udio’s respective AI models. These claims bring to light broader issues regarding the ethical and legal implications of AI-generated content, the need for regulatory clarity, and the evolving relationship between technology and creativity.
Pioneering Legal Challenge: AI in the Music Industry Universal Music Group, Sony Music, and Warner Records have initiated copyright lawsuits against AI companies Udio and Suno for using copyrighted music to train their AI models. Highlighted by Reuters as the first of its kind, these lawsuits signal the music industry's proactive stance against the challenges posed by music-generating AI, potentially reshaping the future development of generative AI in creative fields. As the industry navigates these technological advancements, it's crucial to consider the implications for both creators' rights and ethical AI use, ensuring a balanced approach for all involved. Ars Technica Benj Edwards Danny Goh Mark Esposito, PhD Terence Tse, PhD #MusicIndustry #CopyrightLaw #ArtificialIntelligence #TechNews #Transparency #EthicalAI https://lnkd.in/gF8G9f_A For more discussion, please visit https://lnkd.in/gqDPtry3.
Entrepreneur, Computer & Communications Engineer, Polymath, Music Producer, Audio Engineer, DJ, Music Business Professional, & Critical Thinker🤔 Developing an AI-proof model for the Music Industry with Vinyl Culture 💿
#Music Industry vs #AI ⚖️ The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence has sparked numerous debates about its implications for Intellectual property rights. In a landmark case, #Universal Music Group (UMG), #Concord Music Group, and ABKCO have taken a significant step forward in their #legal battle against AI company #Anthropic. Policymakers may need to consider new frameworks that balance #innovation with the protection of #creative rights. Although, Universal Music Group's (UMG) aggressive stance against AI-generated music is primarily driven by #business interests rather than a pure concern for #artists' #rights. In fact, UMG is collaborating with #Google to develop tools for creating AI tracks using artists' likenesses legally. 🤷🏻♂️ Read the full #Article by Vinyl Culture 📚🔗:
Today on IPWatchdog, Lewis Sorokin wrote: "The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in the music industry has brought about a complex and contentious landscape where innovation intersects with intellectual property rights. Recently, two leading text-to-music AI tools, Suno and Udio, have found themselves at the center of this debate, facing lawsuits for copyright infringement filed by the three major record labels, and led by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). The record labels allege that Suno and Udio used their recordings without a license to train Suno’s and Udio’s respective AI models. These claims bring to light broader issues regarding the ethical and legal implications of AI-generated content, the need for regulatory clarity, and the evolving relationship between technology and creativity."
Tristan Williams writes that a future where artists thrive alongside AI music will come from exploring a diversity of solutions, not from betting it all on fair use.
Product Manager | YouTube Copyright and Channel Manager | AI Business Manager (Certified) | Digital Marketing | Booking Agent
It's not much different than regulating sampled music. If Generative AI companies want to train their models with copyrighted songs, they must pay. Period. Solutions are already there. Companies like ProRata.ai and Musical AI are already tackling this issue. The "AI for Business" certificate I obtained provided me with solid legal knowledge on the matter and everyday passing by without governments implementing a simple regulation allows AI companies to breach copyright law. #AI #GenerativeAI #MusicAI #MusicTech #GenerativeMusic
Co-Founder and CEO at Emerging Tech Armoury, AI Consulting + Training Services | A.I. Strategist | Educator | Green Tech + Cyber Specialist | Forbes Technology Council Member
AI and the Music Industry An AI-generated Drake song has sparked a debate about copyright and the future of music. The song "Heart on My Sleeve" features the voice of Drake rapping over a beat by Metro Boomin. It was uploaded to TikTok by an unknown user, @ghostwriter977, and quickly went viral. The song's origins are shrouded in mystery. Some speculate that it is Drake's publicity stunt, while others believe it is the work of a crypto-adjacent startup. Universal Music Group, Drake's record label, denied involvement but sent takedown notices to streaming services. As AI technology develops, creating realistic forgeries of popular artists will become increasingly easy. This raises several copyright questions. - Who owns the rights to an AI-generated song? - Should artists be compensated for using their voice and likeness in AI creations? The legal battle over "Heart on My Sleeve" is just beginning, but it could have far-reaching implications for the future of music. https://lnkd.in/g8kbfYCY