Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s Post

The five most famous laws in the world 1. Murphy law- The more you fear something happening, the more likely it is to occur 2. Kidlin law- If you write a problem down clearly and specifically, you have solved half of it 3. Gilbert law- When you take on a task, finding the best ways to achieve the desired result is always your responsibility 4. Wilson law- If you prioritize knowledge and intelligence money will continue to come 5. Falkland law- If you don’t have to make a decision about something, then don’t decide 

It's been a crazy week at the Supreme Court, hasn't it? Please join us for our upcoming webinar examining the broad implications of Loper Bright Enterprises and Jarkesy, followed by breakout sessions by industry group for deeper discussions. ‎ Schwabe

How can 1/4 of 1/8 equal 1/4 of 8/8? Short answer - the court determined that this was the parties' intent. Our new blog takes you through the intriguing case of Davis v. COG Operating, LLC. Discover how fractions, language, and the historical context can and does shape property rights interpretation! 🏛️🔍 #HELG #oilandgaslaw https://hubs.ly/Q02vRn_H0

Our latest insight article from the Construction team discusses the recent County Court case of Conway v Conway & Anor which has highlighted the increased emphasis that courts are placing on parties' use of alternative dispute resolution when considering cost orders. The article reviews the decision and examines what impact this will have on the use of alternative dispute resolution going forward. Read the full article 👇 https://gowlg.co/4dGoOpU

In the complex world of legal disputes, where truth is often obscured by the fog of conflicting narratives, one might overlook the humble yet formidable power of a document. In the recent High Court case of Goh Choo Hock v Goh Swee Meng, contemporaneous documents played a crucial role in determining the outcome of a land ownership dispute between two brothers.   This alert by our associate, Siew Hui Ling, discusses the facts of this case and also the principles enunciated by the High Court. Read more at: https://lnkd.in/g7TQbueG

The Supreme Court's decision to overturn the Chevron doctrine has the potential to create more uncertainty for regulated entities - and more opportunities to challenge rulemaking. Read our key takeaways below and join us on Monday for our webinar.

Channegowda & Anr. v. N.S. Vishwanath & Ors. (Neutral Citation: 2023:KHC:44651) A Single Bench of Justice Jyoti Mulimani observed, “An attempt is made on behalf of the plaintiffs to contend that the second plaintiff has sold the property as a General Power of Attorney Holder and not as a title holder. It is argued that the Power of attorney is not compulsorily registrable. The submission is noted with care. Suffice it to note that a deed of power of attorney is not one of the instruments specified under Section 17 of the Registration Act compulsorily registrable. However, if a power has been created empowering the attorney to sell the property i.e., if a document that gives a right to the attorney holder to sell the immovable property, then it would be a document creating an interest in immovable property, which would require compulsory registration.”

The latest article from my colleagues Michael O'Shea and Dominic Sinnott is a useful and quick summary of the decision of Conway v Conway & Anor providing further insight into the Court's approach to mediation and the increased emphasis on parties' use of alternative dispute resolution when considering cost orders #construction #mediation

On June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court issued a decision overturning doctrine established in a prior decision. Ellen Simmons Moskal explains the ramifications in our latest news update: "Loper Bright: What is Not Impacted by the Supreme Court’s Recent Ruling Overturning the Chevron Doctrine." #californiaenvironmentallawyers #californialawyers #californiawaterlawyers #californiawaterlawattorneys #coloradowaterlawattorneys #coloradoenvironmentallawyers #loperbright

LAW SOCIETY OF BC SUING GOVERNMENT Necessity to resort to litigation for government accountability Law Society of British Columbia (LSBC) in my two decades of membership, I've never felt more proud of or grateful for our LSBC than I do today. The decision to initiate litigation against the constitutionality of Bill 21—the Legal Professions Act, recently ratified on May 16, 2024—is a critical step in upholding our mandate to safeguard public interests by preserving fundamental rights and freedoms. This legal action serves as a crucial precedent. The encroachment of unnecessary government directives poses a direct threat to our civil liberties and undermines the foundational pillars of our province and nation. Despite resolute opposition from various stakeholders, and amidst concerns regarding the Act's potential erosion of professional autonomy, the BC Government curtailed debate, hastily enacting flawed legislation. As articulated by our LSBC President, Jeevyn Dhaliwal, KC, the government's failure to facilitate thorough consultation and their abrupt closure of debate suggest a disconcerting lack of intention to engage in comprehensive dialogue on matters with profound implications for public interest. The necessity to resort to litigation for governmental accountability is regrettable and indicative of concerning trends. Beyond the immediate legal implications, the government's actions are inflicting profound harm upon financial freedom, small business enterprises, and the intrinsic motivation to strive for success. These policies don't just impact the legal realm; they reverberate throughout our economic and societal landscape, stifling entrepreneurial endeavors and impeding prosperity. By imposing undue constraints and restraining opportunities, the government is fostering a hostile environment for small businesses and dampening the spirit of innovation. This legal challenge transcends mere courtroom proceedings; it represents a resolute defense of democratic principles and the preservation of individual liberties. It is incumbent upon us to unite in opposition to these detrimental policies and advocate for a government characterized by transparency, accountability, and a commitment to justice, equality, and economic freedom. This juncture is pivotal in our history, and it demands our unwavering resolve to safeguard the bedrock principles upon which our society is founded. #LegalRights #GovernmentAccountability #CivilLiberties #JusticeMatters #ProfessionalIndependence #PublicInterest #LegalChallenge #EconomicFreedom #SmallBusinessSupport #Transparency #RuleOfLaw #SafeguardingFreedom #ConstitutionalRights #LegalProfession #FairDebate #EntrepreneurialSpirit #DefendingDemocracy #RightsandFreedoms #LawSocietyBC #GettingAhead #TrueEquality #TimeForChange #DemandAccountability #HardWorkRewarded