Alexander Clemm’s Post

Compliance is not an end in itself. This is a fact, regardless of how you define "Compliance," for your organization, including Information Security, IT Security, Business Continuity, Ethical Compliance (Code of Conduct, etc.), and Legal Compliance. However, there is a trade-off for nearly every organization in how functions are perceived: 👉 Business: Primary objective is to be successful in the market, make money. 👉 Compliance: I need to make the business adhere to rules, report on deviations and punish all "heretics". Clearly, this is a very simplified and one-sided depiction of "Compliance" as a function in an organization. Yet, there are still many advocates for such a notion of Compliance - on both sides. "Compliance" has earned a negative connotation in organizations. Modern organizations understand that Compliance is an exceptional business enabler. To benefit from this, both sides need to approach the topic with the right mindset. The correct statement for the perception of Compliance above would be: 💡 Compliance: Primary objective is to provide transparency on risks, enable risk-driven decisions for the business. Be an internal think tank for all kinds of the organizations' capabilities. When the business is involving compliance in all relevant internal developments (organizational, product, tech - you name it) at an early stage, the following parts get an "X" in the RACI for Compliance: 👉 Make sure, the business understands all relevant requirements. 👉 Be a think tank for product development and organizational improvements to be in line with compliance requirements - in an efficient manner. 👉 Govern risk management to ensure complete transparency of the risk landscape. Balance the organization's risk appetite with a business-centric view of risks, avoiding a purely stringent compliance-driven approach. 👉 Provide *meaningful* reporting to stakeholders. 👉 Involve all relevant stakeholders in the implementation of compliance. Done correctly, this leads to multiple competitive advantages for the organization: 👉 Your organization's maturity is perceived as significantly higher. 👉 More time on business/ product questions in tender questionnaires. 👉 Have a better posture in contractual negotiations. 👉 External audits consume less resources. 👉 Way better on internal processes and flows. 👉 Be pushed on important initatives (e. g. asset management, accountability, standardization of processes). For sure, Compliance is an extra that companies need to pocket. But: The competition needs to deal with the same burden Make it your advantage to control your approach to be a meaningful, efficient one. Most of what is regulated, is regulated for a reason though. Accept and capitalize on it. Compliance is a business enabler. In today's blog post, I elaborate further on this topic in more detail. https://lnkd.in/ezBq9Wmw #Compliance #InformationSecurity #ComplianceManagenment

Two: Compliance is a Business Enabler and Catalyst - vucavoid

Two: Compliance is a Business Enabler and Catalyst - vucavoid

vucavoid.com

Christian Gilcher (Dr.-Ing.)

Experte für Agentic Process Automation | embraceableAI

8mo

well said, couldn't agree more Alexander Clemm

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics