Over the past 5 years, this unfortunately was almost inevitable in the contentious evolution of the #NASCAR business and their teams' revenue models: https://lnkd.in/eFsQfn7y
Full disclosure: before continuing my career in #transportation leading XPO Logistics and RXO's global air transport division, I had several inquiries about returning to racing. In 2018 I interviewed with the executive search firm hiring the executive director for the Race Team Alliance (RTA). Their objectives had merit, but I had reservations about methodology, alignment between the stakeholders, and thus this role. While the #RTA certainly gets credit for driving the introduction of the "charter system," many other initiatives (or lack thereof) perplexed me and others with management backgrounds in and outside racing.
Teams are "unified" on wanting more revenue and income from NASCAR (which today is primarily derived from media broadcast rights), but aren't necessarily well-aligned on other factors. Neither are the drivers. One key factor is 3 unique types of NASCAR team owners today.
(1) "legacy financial elites" (ex. - Hendrick, Penske) with tenure who are a small part of their owners' large-cap commercial empires. So even a $20-30M valuation as alleged for recent charter sales is just a blip on their financials. These teams rely heavily on B2B to outperform their rivals in sponsorship revenue and marketing their commercial businesses.
(2) "hustlers" (previously called drive-and-park or rent-a-ride teams) at the other end of the spectrum, mainly long-time racers, some with questionable financial/business resumes, that mastered the art of fielding a NASCAR team with minimal Capex and Opex, and then "hustling" for pay drivers and jigsaw sponsorships to meet budgets and generate personal income. This group benefited most from the charter system and has been most active selling/renting them.
(3) "rest of the field" - comprised of of new and legacy organizations who lack the wealth or b2b resources of Hendrick or Penske, but have a track record of commitment to the sport and fielding competitive Top 20 teams not based primarily on the "hustling" model.
Each group has different motivations - why teams haven't appeared unified or reached a consensus under the RTA despite "negotiating" for 2+ years. Reportedly by ultimatum, most teams finally signed NASCAR's new "charter agreement" because they were out of time, re-secured their guaranteed entries, and increased revenue. NASCAR leadership recognized these factors and that guided how far they would divide their revenues.
#MichaelJordan and 23XI were the most likely to challenge NASCAR for 3 reasons: (1) public/commercial clout, plus wealth (2) no long-term history with NASCAR (3) unique contract and legal perspective from other sports leagues. Court proceedings will be interesting; the defendant wants to avoid disclosing business and financial data, conversely, discovery is a key leverage factor for the plaintiffs. 🤔
Creative engineer who excels at architecting technology solutions within business processes and across ecosystems.
4moGiven how much gas vehicles pollute, contributing to poor health outcomes both directly through air pollution, accidents, etc as well as indirectly through climate change and related health issues from increased heat, I'm surprised and disappointed to see this kind of sponsorship from a health care company.