Anselmi & Carvelli, LLP’s Post

A recent High Court case has addressed the circumstance where a claimant in an arbitration returned to court to seek to resume the court proceedings they had originally commenced. The respondent in the arbitration had previously obtained an order to defer those court proceedings in favour of arbitration. However, they had not conducted the arbitration in a timely and efficient fashion. As a result, the Court was prepared to lift the deferral and allow the litigation proceed. We examine this decision. https://buff.ly/3VYcQlu Did you find this helpful? • 📣 Reshare to your network & follow Mason Hayes & Curran LLP • 🔔 Ring the bell for daily insights • 🕐 Short on time? Bookmark this post to read it later #MHCLaw #LegalUpdate #CommercialDisputes #DisputeResolution

Do you know this term? In arbitration, parties involved in a dispute agree to appoint a neutral third party, typically called an arbitrator, to hear their case and make a binding decision. The arbitrator listens to both sides, reviews evidence, and renders a decision that resolves the conflict. This process is often chosen as an alternative to litigation because it can be faster, more cost-effective, and offers more privacy to the parties involved. If you or your loved ones have been injured due to someone's negligence, call us today for a FREE consultation at +646-285-7115. Remember, NO WIN, NO FEE. #personalinjurylawyers #nycinjurylawyer #RedmondLawFirm #newyorklawyer #accidentlawyer

In a recent case, the High Court examined whether a company's liquidator is bound by an arbitration agreement after the company is wound up. The case raises questions about the enforceability of arbitration clauses in such situations and the potential impact on creditors' rights. To read more, click here: https://lnkd.in/gmJfRJ4e. This article was written by our associate, Ooi Ji Shan, from the Arbitration Practice Group. For more information, please reach out to your usual contact from our Arbitration Practice Group (https://lnkd.in/gp3hZ3pt). #shearndelamore #arbitrationlaw #legalupdates

The Court of Appeal for Ontario has provided recent guidance on the appropriate timing of motions to stay litigation in favour of arbitration – before seeking the court’s assistance in addressing the substance of a claim. Chloe Snider and Camila Maldi discuss the implications of the decision and offer key takeaways on how the order and timing of motions can impact litigation and arbitration outcomes. Read more: https://ow.ly/OwFg30sFJpp #Arbitration #Litigation #DisputeResolution #OntarioCourtOfAppeal

The Court of Appeal for Ontario has provided recent guidance on the appropriate timing of motions to stay litigation in favour of arbitration – before seeking the court’s assistance in addressing the substance of a claim. Chloe Snider and Camila Maldi discuss the implications of the decision and offer key takeaways on how the order and timing of motions can impact litigation and arbitration outcomes. Read more: https://ow.ly/ucfL30sFHAT #Arbitration #Litigation #DisputeResolution #OntarioCourtOfAppeal

Jackson Lewis attorney Tia Martarella spoke with Law360 about the steps employer-side attorneys are taking to adjust their strategies for constructing arbitration clauses in plan documents. Read more here: https://lnkd.in/etCy5PST #EmploymentLaw

The Court of Appeal for Ontario has provided recent guidance on the appropriate timing of motions to stay litigation in favour of arbitration – before seeking the court’s assistance in addressing the substance of a claim. Chloe Snider and Camila Maldi discuss the implications of the decision and offer key takeaways on how the order and timing of motions can impact litigation and arbitration outcomes. Read more: https://lnkd.in/enK8kQtP #Arbitration #Litigation #DisputeResolution #OntarioCourtOfAppeal 

The Court of Appeal for Ontario has provided recent guidance on the appropriate timing of motions to stay litigation in favour of arbitration – before seeking the court’s assistance in addressing the substance of a claim. Chloe Snider and Camila Maldi discuss the implications of the decision and offer key takeaways on how the order and timing of motions can impact litigation and arbitration outcomes. Read more: https://ow.ly/jjUz30sFHzB #Arbitration #Litigation #DisputeResolution #OntarioCourtOfAppeal

The Court of Appeal for Ontario has provided recent guidance on the appropriate timing of motions to stay litigation in favour of arbitration – before seeking the court’s assistance in addressing the substance of a claim. Chloe Snider and Camila Maldi discuss the implications of the decision and offer key takeaways on how the order and timing of motions can impact litigation and arbitration outcomes. Read more: https://ow.ly/XMFR30sGb5n #Arbitration #Litigation #DisputeResolution #OntarioCourtOfAppeal