Atomic Academia’s Post

Writing competition to win a free book! 🎊 The most popular Haiku every year will receive a free book. #freebook #giveaways #competitions #bookgiveaway #poetry  https://lnkd.in/ek-KahWi

Become a changemaker in education. Apply to the Atomic Academia Team today!

Atomic Academia Preprint Journal - 2024, Issue 1.

Like our content, you can help us without donating directly in the UK: https://lnkd.in/eKrxA_4w? #education #charity #fundraising through easyfundraising 🖤

We're delighted to have such a distinguished academic join our wonderful team. Thank you Nick for your commitment to sharing a love of science, learning and education.

Simulation on Atomic Academia - Present Clinical or Legal Cases to your students in an online environment. Allow students to respond independently or collectively based on your requirements. Enable students to demonstrate professional decision-making skills and provide invaluable feedback to instructors. https://lnkd.in/eRGRTP59

Why LLMs Excel in Processing But Aren't Capable of Thought: Understanding the Nature of Word Selection In the realm of artificial intelligence, Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 have revolutionised how we interact with technology. These models are exceptional at processing language, generating coherent text, and even mimicking human-like responses. However, it's crucial to understand the fundamental differences between processing language and true cognitive thought. Understanding the Process: LLMs operate based on a sophisticated mechanism of predicting the next word in a sequence. This process, driven by massive datasets and complex algorithms, allows them to create sentences that are grammatically correct and contextually relevant. The images shared illustrate the attention mechanism within these models. Each word in a sentence influences the selection of subsequent words through weighted connections, which are visualised in these attention maps. Why Word Selection Doesn't Equate to Thought: Predictive Patterns: LLMs rely on learned patterns from vast amounts of data. They don't understand meaning in the way humans do but predict what word comes next based on probabilities derived from their training data. Random Generation: Despite the appearance of intelligence, LLMs can produce outputs that are inconsistent or inaccurate. This randomness is a result of probabilistic word selection, which, while usually contextually appropriate, lacks the depth of true understanding and reasoning. No Conscious Intent: True thought involves consciousness, intent, and understanding, which are beyond the capabilities of any current AI. LLMs don't "think" or "understand" but follow algorithms to process and generate text. Implications: While LLMs are powerful tools for language processing, their outputs should be critically evaluated, especially in contexts requiring deep understanding and nuanced thought. The distinction between processing language and actual thinking is fundamental in setting realistic expectations and applications for AI. In essence, LLMs excel at mimicking the form of human language but lack the substance of human thought. Understanding this distinction helps us leverage AI effectively while recognising its limitations. #AI #MachineLearning #LanguageModels #ArtificialIntelligence #Technology #Innovation #LLMs #UnderstandingAI

Our founder nominated for Tech Entrepreneur of the Year 24! 🚀 💥 Wait til our inaugural publication drops, 10 December 2024. Like Whistledown 🔍 but for Research!

Atomic Academia - For #Research and #PhD #Student Excellence. #phdlife #postdoc